Could the Disappearing "Enrollees" from the Pfizer Trial Explain Differences in Death Numbers?

Would This Be Smoking Gun Enough? It Sounds Like Hiding the Bodies

Among the divides I’ve seen among the folks who are onto the Covid con and the recognize the futility and danger of the jabs is one in which some very excellent researchers are arriving at disparate points in how ineffective, dangerous or deadly these shots are. There are some like RFK Jr. who tend to pour through Pfizer, VAERS and CDC data. Even using their own statistics and tables, he and his team at Children’s Health Defense can often find smoking guns, just as you can in VAERS data, even if you assume no underreporting factor. But the numbers from some of this excellent and overly thorough analysis are just not that scary to move the needle. Some CDC report that finds three cases of myocarditis per 10,000 doses of jabs in 18 to 30 year old males, which authorities insist is transient and minor, doesn’t sound that frightening to potential vaccinees. I agree with many of his articles and know he’s chipping away using Pfizer’s own submitted data. I think even a 1 in 100,000 death rate in the jabbed is premeditated genocide. Is their own data honest enough to prove fraud, though?

On the other side are the fear mongers who claim that the jabbed could all be dead in two years. It’s hypothetically possible, but I know a lot of injected people who are very much alive and I hope they stay that way. I’d say some of these Pfizer and Moderna trial participants should be followed up on though.

Somewhere on a more middle ground are some data crunchers like life insurance actuary Edward Dowd, who reported a 40% rise in working age mortality in Q3 2021. He’s looking at big number statistics and has no idea of the personal jab status of those with mortality or disability claims. But if this didn’t happen in 2020 and the dataset is so large that there’s strong statistical power to his results, then one can surmise that the Covid “vaccines” was the one thing that changed between those two years. Steve Kirsch also chips away at the underreporting factor in various ways with compelling results.

Data and anecdotes continue pouring in from everywhere. My BFF that I mentioned in Collage of Compliance Part 3 is apparently in shock over the “hit me like a ton of bricks” death of a close friend of hers in St. Louis. The wording sounds a lot like a sudden death. I went to her friends facebook page, curious if this person had been jabbed. She didn’t leave me hanging on this question, as a recent profile picture of her said “I Still Don’t Trust Authority…And I’m Vaccinated.” I’m not sure what that even means.

All of those things can be brushed off and safely ignored by health authorities. All they have to say is it’s the Covid pandemic and that the jab had no relation to the personal death and it goes away. This probably soothes the nerves of some very nervous people who got these “vaccines.” They seem willing to tolerate the zero efficacy profile, as a lot of shoddy medicines stay on the market for years for those who swear by them. But dying a horrific death of prion disease might get their attention to stop playing Russian Roulette. Perhaps they haven’t buried enough of their dead yet.

For me the best way for the liability shield to get withdrawn is if you can prove trial fraud. I have no doubt that Pfizer, Moderna et al went to great length hiding smoking guns with a baffling degree of tables, charts and tabulations that never let you see the forest from the trees. But I think this brilliant piece didn’t get the attention it deserved:

Pfizer Data

To summarize what Joy is saying here is that she found over 10,000 people who “disappeared” from the original Pfizer trial. They were considered “enrollees” and not participants, but if they received any jabs or a placebo, they obviously should have been included on some participant list. So what happened to them, this stunning 11% of the total trial numbers? Did they move to Samoa? Refuse to answer the phone? Were they so badly affected by the first jab, perhaps either injured or dead, that they could not take a second one? Nobody knows, apparently. They were just thrown out.

Of course another question is was there a difference of protocol variations between the placebo and the “vaccinated?” Joy implies that all of these lost participants were jabbed with at least one dose, which is stunning if true. Even in the final results there were problems there, as articulated by this biomedical researcher on reading the preliminary Pfizer results: "The first real red flag can be found in Table 2, page 18. There were 311 cases excluded for protocol deviations. only 60 placebos were excluded. Fives times as many cases had been excluded. Those two numbers should have been the same. Why were five times as many cases excluded as controls for protocol deviation? I recall thinking at the time ‘What was the protocol deviation? Did they die?”.

If these clinical trials are so fraud riddled that they can even throw out the injured or dead before analyzing anything, then we have a huge problem. The can literally hide the bodies. On the other side, I don’t think you get much more fraudulent than that.

Perhaps things are changing for the better. My brother and his family are travelling to Vermont today, on my father’s birthday, to meet our other brother and his family for the very first time. It’s an auspiscious moment. Perhaps Covidcon is really over, but the question remains, will the jabs be rescinded? And will the perpetrators ever be held accountable?

Buy me a ko-fi...