Could They Have Been Routing More Harmful Covid Vaccine Lots to Republican Areas?

A Theory About Theories

One of the things that I have absolutely loved about substack is that the debates seem to have moved far far far past “Is the Covid vaccine safe and effective?” and firmly into the journalistic territory of who, what, when, where and how of the higher deaths and lower births that have followed on from it. I love smoking gun proof but I also enjoy the open minded speculation about who is doing it, why they are doing it, what the mechanism of harm is from the jabs, and how they are trying to control it. I don’t know everything, so I feel it is best to keep open minded. Some areas of contention have merged around:

1. Is there a virus or not?

2. Is the thing labelled as the Covid virus any more deadly than the flu?

3. Is the spike protein in the “vaccines” the deadly mechanism of action? Were other things added that could be causing the blood clots, say, and what were they?

4. Are some vaccine lots intentionally more dangerous than others, or is this just a side effect of manufacturing, storage, and uptake?

5. Did the people in power just botch stuff and now they are trying to cover it up like common criminals, or is there an active depopulation agenda at work?

6. Why do most of the jabbed seem so unwilling to confront the reality that safe and effective is not safe and effective? Is it fear for their own mortality? Ego that makes them unwilling to admit that they’ve been had? Or is it something else?

Regarding point number 5 Sage Hana just posted this very thought provoking article:

Catherine Austin Fitts:"The only thing...that would explain this is a quota system being enforced...every country or state is given a quota of how much they have to reduce their population"

To which I posted my own exchange in the comments:

Writes Amy’s Newsletter5 hr agoLiked by Sage Hana

Great detective work Sage. Now I agree with Catherine Austin Fitts I think there has to be a follow the money type of thing on these credit contracts. I suspect the experiments with vaccines go way back before the Covid jabs, so yes, formulations are intentionally varied. The early jab rollout in January 2021 can be looked at as nothing less than a cull of the oldest and most vulnerable if you check the USA all cause mortality numbers on the oldest age groups who were getting these jabs. It was all blamed hilariously on a Covid outbreak, which made no sense unless the jabs gave the old folks Covid (probably--and then they'd be added to the unvaxxed death stats since they just got the jab AND all the hospitals/medical centers could collect Covid bonus bucks. Profiting off the cull AND blaming it on the unvaccinated! Brilliant!). I often think back to my husband Oh's medical check--he was sure they gave him three vaccines, one in which he claimed the syringe was huge, like eight inches long and the circumferance of your thumb. We had barely made the income threshold for the immigrant visa, meaning we were poor and Oh was expendable. A system of classification of that type could be automated to a degree that even the vaccinators don't know what's in that crap. The computer screen just says this is what we do, this is the batch that gets sent here, this is the lot that gets sent there. There also could be a two factor system in place, combining this with something like 5G. All speculation on my part but always follow the money

5 hr agoAuthor

Brilliant insights.

AMD has covered how different batches have been tested before.

I think they just kept going and going and sorted out some ways to harm with plausible deniability AND I'm not gonna lie, I sorting out how they send in the Ops to derail the discoveries.

Writes Amy’s Newsletter5 hr agoLiked by Sage Hana

I've been on deep personal musings regarding guilt in death. I did not feel guilty when Oh died: you just couldn't seem to save him. From a heroic point of view he may well have done something akin to what Clint Eastwood's character did in the movie Gran Torino. He was in a lot of pain he'd been warned that drinking would blow out his pancreas and didn't want to be stuck in that prison. He considered America as akin to him being in jail. But I did feel a great deal of guilt when Mar (my mother in law) died. I had laid into her too hard about how perhaps giving Oh up for adoption when he was a boy had screwed him up and I think she internalized that guilt after her son died. That might not seem related to anything but I'll tie it back: in checking on BFF number 2 on facebook yesterday, I noticed she's steered herself right back on full Covidcon narrative. She posted a link to a study finding that excess mortality widened to 10% between Democrat and Republican areas of the country, which was blamed of course on Republicans being less willing to take safe and effective. She lamented how long misinformation spreaders (like me, apparently) would be allowed to not embrace safe and effective. Now the original study was paywalled, so I could gather very little about the methods used, but it was obviously clickbait for bluechecks AND completely retained the safe and effective narrative. That got me thinking to how three of her close relatives (her father, her aunt, and one whom she did not name) died unexpectedly in late 2021. BFF 2 is black, from a working class family in Toledo. I have a few deep choices there: on one extreme, perhaps her relatives didn't trust whitey and never got safe and effective like she did, so maybe their deaths were really unrelated (I have intense personal knowledge of death in threes, needless to say). But on the other extreme, let's say that she, the most successful person in the family with her big Silicon Valley corporate VP credentials, pushed her perhaps hesitant family members to get the jabs and they died suddenly shortly afterwards. Would she ever personally be able to reconcile the guilt? Or would she have to double down on her delusions? The crack between the one side's narrative and the others has widened to the point where it's split in two like the Titanic.

4 hr agoAuthor

This Democrat vs. Republican conflation of vials and consequences continues to baffle me.

I give up.

I give up on that one.

People are not savvy. Show Toledo chick the top story in this post and watch her melt into a puddle.

Detonate the Stack Wednesday: "It is a Gene Therapy"

Writes Amy’s Newsletter4 hr agoLiked by Sage Hana

From a cynical herd the cullers perspective, perhaps they are targeting Republican areas with badder batches. And then blaming it on the unjabbed! They like those brilliant kill two or three birds with one stone things.

4 hr agoAuthor

Sure! Thought of that too.

And this was the roots of Lipid's question on Utah on this thread as well, it would seem to be an anomaly.

But the point I'm making and admittedly it makes me mentally ill with frustration is the Toledo Chicks of the world, (and she is not unique, I dealt with a doc/sci last summer the same) just make the fucking bullshit up as they go (Trumpers do this too) to suit their more primal ID needs.

Identity "trumps" what is in the vials.

I give up. It makes me furious. It makes me want to jump off a bridge.

That's unique to me. That to some extent fuels much of what I do.

Singing about dancing. That's what I call it.

Writes Amy’s Newsletter4 hr agoLiked by Sage Hana

It's calming to get to the root of the matter. In much the same way that the argument between a married couple is almost never the REAL argument. Just hiding behind a flag

4 hr agoAuthor

The root of the matter. Yes.

I want to get to that part.

I think there are like seven of us.

I hope sage include me in the seven. Or am I number eight?

For reasons related to my personal experiences, I am not going to try to show my friend Sage Hana’s substack. Yet another area of fierce debate in the long time antivaxxer space is “Do you have a moral obligation to show people the harms associated with vaccines?” After great consideration of this issue, I have personally come to a lead a horse to water way of doing things. I’ve posted links on my substack on facebook several times, even though I get virtually zero traffic from there. If there is a single subscriber on my substack who has known me in real life prior to my writing on substack, they haven’t identified themselves to me.

Part of this is because I think belief plays a massive and understated role in healing, living and death. If I was jabbed I would quite frankly be terrified to look at videos of blood clots being pulled out of cadavers in the movie “Died Suddenly.” I would start freaking out on whether that was going to happen to me. Similarly I found that some mothers could not accept the guilt of realizing that all those jabs they gave their babies had actually harmed them. The realization was too painful. Perhaps in these cases ignorance is a protective mechanism. Leave them to their talismans.

The study BFF linked is this one, entitled Since Vaccines were Introduced More Republicans Died than Democrats. Now I tried to click on the original study to see the methods section but it was paywalled. Obviously this is a population wide study so we don’t know the jab status of individuals who died, or their individual party affiliation, for that matter. The left wing media likes to portray Republicans as a lot of things that lead to poorer health outcomes: they are less educated, rural, whiter, married and older. Republicans are not actually fatter or lower income than Democrats. But needless to say there’s a lot of potential confounding variables in this study. It’s clickbait for the left and a comfort blanket for all the Fauci ouchies to boot.

New research from Yale SOM points to another factor that puts people at greater risk of dying from COVID-19: party affiliation. The study finds that excess deaths during the pandemic were 76% higher among Republicans than Democrats in two states, Ohio and Florida. What’s more, the partisan gap in death rates increased significantly after vaccines were introduced.

The research was conducted by Yale SOM’s Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham and Jacob Wallace and Jason L. Schwartz of the Yale School of Public Health.

To Goldsmith-Pinkham, the sharp divergence in excess death rates that emerged in the post-vaccine period “is pretty striking…and the magnitudes are quite large.” While the research doesn’t definitively prove that low vaccine uptake among Republicans explains the mortality gap, “it points to this as a potential mechanism.”

Another potential mechanism is that they sent all the really bad jabs to Republican areas! Can I retitle the study with that?

Buy me a ko-fi