French Health Authority Drops Covid Vaccines for the General Population, Yet Still Wants Pregnant Women to Get Boosters

This After 78% of Women Reported Menstrual Irregularities Following Covid Jabs

The French Health Authority has dropped Covid-19 vaccine recommendations for the general population. According to this article in le Monde, 'Almost all of the population not at risk of severe disease has already come into contact with the virus at least once,' said the French National Authority for Health.’ While this news might sound wonderful to those in the stop the shots crowd, they simultaneously expanded the list of those who are not considered in the general population for the fall booster campaign of Covid-19 along with the flu jabs. Now anyone over 65, along with anyone immunosuppressed, along with health care workers, are recommended to get the jabs yet again in the fall. It seems that the culling operation has achieved its objectives and now they want to quietly just add this to the vaccines schedule while fading this specific operation into the background.

The French Health Authority also recommends that pregnant women receive a booster shot. What percentage of women who have taken all of these jabs before are still alive and can get pregnant? What they’ve done to the potential fertility of the human population could qualify as the greatest Covid crime of all:

EVA Project Finds 78% of Women Report Menstrual Changes after COVID-19 Vaccination

As Dr. McCullough writes:

“One of the consequences of young healthy woman receiving an unnecessary COVID-19 vaccine is the dangerous transition from being previously well to a new state of discomfort and or altered reproductive physiology. This is exactly what has happened to the vast majority of women in the childbearing age range with mRNA and adenoviral vaccination. Both forms of the vaccine use lipid nanoparticles which for years have been known to be taken up by reproductive glands (ovaries and testis) and dump their payload of genetic code for the WIV BA4/BA5 Spike protein which starts producing the tissue damaging Spike within an hour. The mRNA is now known to circulate in the bloodstream for 28 days and continue to bombard the ovaries with more mRNA throughout the ovulatory cycle. Genetic vaccines loaded on lipid nanoparticles, are almost by design as depicted by Wang et al destined to influence ovulatory cycles, gametocyte production and viability, thus interfering with the complex and delicate reproductive cycle of human beings.”

Dr. Naomi Wolf has been on this one for a long time, and has been viciously cancelled for even suggesting that there could be a problem here. So 78% of women, in short almost four out of five, experienced disruptions in their menstrual cycles following Covid jabs. What the long term effects of these problem are is completely unknown. But in my personal experience they’ve been normalizing abnormal for a long time.

Note that in the following Storytime With Amy I am referring to pregnant people as Women. I am not aware of a single person that was born biologically male that has ever given birth, period. There might be extremely rare cases of XXY chromosome deformity in true hermaphrodites that have given birth (11 cases according to google and all had male babies) but these are not large enough numbers for me to care about. There likewise might be some handwaving arguments about scientific advancements and mechanical wombs but thus far these things are not beyond prototypes. I’m tired of nonsense of being identified as a person with a cervix or a person who has menstrual cycles. How far is that really from the old misogynistic joke “Never trust anything that bleeds for five days and doesn’t die.”?

How could you sever the connection with the most sacred giver of life? Women and especially Mother are words that not only shouldn’t be erased, but I think should be spoken with more reverence. I don’t care how bad your mother was if you are reading this you have her to thank.

Why Is the Date Hidden?

It felt like pulling teeth to determine when my younger daughter was actually conceived. On my first two ultrasounds she was listed as the pregnancy start date of the first day of my last period, which has been commonly done for the last few decades. I wanted to know what the date was. I think it is important to know when true conception happened for so many reasons. The dating of the pregnancy to the first day of a woman’s last menstrual cycle undercuts factions of both pro-choice and pro life consortiums.

First, a woman with normal cycles will be considered about two weeks pregnant before she has even conceived the baby. A seven week pregnancy on paper is often going to be a woman who conceived only five weeks ago. My experience is that a woman with relatively normal cycles who is not meticulously tracking things will seldom know that she is pregnant, usually by taking a home test after a late period, until she is already considered 5-7 weeks along. By the time she is able to schedule an OB-GYN appointment to confirm the pregnancy she may be 8 to 12 weeks along on paper. This is not a defense of abortion as much as it is an explanation that during early stages of pregnancy the dates can move around and are often moved to further along in the pregnancy than she actually is.

The dating of pregnancy to the first day of a woman’s last menstrual cycle equally undercuts the pro life movement, as the more hardline Christian factions tend to believe that life begins at conception. So why would the most sacred event that led to the creation of this life be systematically hidden? Would be parents would likely want to know what day their child was actually conceived, if only to tie the creation to a specific romantic story and sexual encounter. Some couples that have been trying to conceive for awhile would desperately want that information if only to backtrack to things they might have done that time that were different from other times or perhaps to pinpoint cycle irregularities. For some women knowing the date of conception allows her to accurately know paternity of the child.

This information should be pretty obvious on ultrasound. I asked one OB-GYN why they could not tell me the date of conception. She told me that it was backtracked to the first day of a woman’s last menstrual period because many women had uneven ovulation. She also said that many women found it easier to remember the date of their last period than of a conception event.

Neither answer made much sense to me. If a woman’s cycles and ovulation are extremely uneven then her menstrual cycles might also be wonky. So why would that date, a date in which almost none of the women actually got pregnant, be better? As an example a woman sometimes ovulates when her cycles return following a pregnancy but before she has her next period. If she were to become pregnant then, the conception would be in theory dated to the beginning of her last pregnancy. Talk about having twins born 16 months apart!

That women would be more likely to remember the date of their last menstrual cycle than they would the dates that they had intercourse was even more depressing to me. If the sex was so lousy that you don’t remember it as well as you do when your period started, then I think you need to find better lovers. All of it seemed tied to keeping people unconscious.

As the medical space increasingly muddied the waters as to when and how a woman actually became pregnant, they simultaneously blurred the lines on what a normal fertility cycle looked like. They also started handing out birth control pills like candy on the hypothetical basis of BUT YOU COULD get pregnant. I’ve heard of young teenage virgin girls that are prescribed birth control because something hypothetically might happen.

I was prescribed birth control pills during a time in college when I had no sexual partners to potentially help with my uneven cycles. Those seemed to cause my cycles to become even more crazy and looking back, in my case, it could have even started with vaccines. At first my OB GYNs seemed to think that a 28 day menstrual cycle was normal, then they extended it out to 23 to 33 days as a normal range. They also widened the number of days late or early before a menstrual cycle was considered uneven, presumably to accommodate the increasing numbers of women whose biological rhythms were becoming untethered.

All of this I suspect was done to hide a fertility collapse that predated Covid vaccines. It is probably multifactor and the result of electromagnetic pollution, pesticides, chemicals, poisons and industrial waste, along with vaccine damage. By muddying the waters on normal menstrual cycles while simultaneously pre emptively sterilizing women with pills the damage can be hidden and normalized over a period of time. Meanwhile in clown world everybody can now hypothetically become pregnant. Men can become pregnant, and 51 year old women who haven’t had a cycle in 2 years should be on birth control pills just in case. It’s all being done to manage the decline.

I was able to find out when both of my daughters were conceived. They stated forthrightly with my older daughter that it had happened on or around November 24. That coincided that year with a happy memory of a big Thanksgiving event in Centerline, Michigan. My younger girl was conceived on US Mother’s Day in Phuket, Thailand, after watching a movie called The 40 Year Old Virgin. It was important for me to know those specifics.

There was something romantic about knowing when life began. Here’s hoping some damage can be undone.

Buy me a ko-fi