How Did They Get so Many Jabs in So Many Peoples Arms?
The Stick-Carrot-Stick
Phuket, Thailand
To counter my lack of electricity I have been going with my husband to Wat Muang Mai to charge my phones and computer for the last few days. I’ve been engaging in interesting conversations with a German monk and it seems that in my temporary situation the Buddhist temple has become my new Starbucks. When I first moved in with my parents in Las Vegas in 2011 they had no Internet, so I found someplace nearby where the people inside expressed clearly that I was welcome there to work. That was usually Starbucks number 2722. It was a good experience.
They have had a funeral and wake going on for the last few days at the Buddhist Temple. The picture in front of the casket was a selfie of a young Thai woman on the beach. The style of the photograph clearly indicated that the photo was recent and the person was young. I was able to confirm from the monk that she was 32.
I have no idea what this person died of, but I suspect a died suddenly situation. I also have no idea if this individual took any Covid-19 vaccines or not. But I suspect that it is likely.
Here’s a chart from our world in data of what percentage of the population took any Covid-19 vaccines in Thailand. They stopped the chart last September when it stood at around 80% of the total Thai population:
The died suddenly phenomena in young people seems to be worldwide wherever these jabs were widely employed. While I can’t say in individual cases the trend of rising excess mortality and declining birth rates is ongoing and persistent. But this brings back a relevant question. How did they get jabs in so many arms in country after country?
Igor Chudov had this thought provoking piece:
In it he writes:
The UK government was reluctant to press on with lockdowns but was always pushed into lockdowns by powerful outside forces.
Those forces were paid and coordinated by aptly named (by eugyppius) “creepy conspiratorial globalists,” such as Bill Gates, his foundation, and the World Economic Forum.
The Purpose of Lockdowns Was to Keep People Miserable Until They Got Vaccinated.
The plan was quite simple:
Lock down every state (and every country)
Develop the COVID vaccine
Only after the vaccine is given can people get back to work
The plan was broadly in place before the official beginning of the pandemic. Event 201, held on Oct 18, 2019, and sponsored by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum, issued recommendations with similar suggestions.
Event 201’s recommendations mention (1) political decisions to slow or stop the movement of people and goods, a.k.a lockdowns, (2) vaccines, and (3) public-private cooperation.
Holding Governments Hostage Through “Public-Private Cooperation”
Underlined in blue in the picture (3) above is public-private cooperation. It is a relatively new concept.
In the past, sovereign governments were elected by voters and decided on policies to please domestic voters or, at most, domestic businesses.
In the last few decades, a new concept of global stakeholders has evolved. Those are large international businesses or private forums, not selected via any electoral process but possessing outsized influence on previously sovereign governments. Examples of “global business leaders” mentioned in the quote (3) are Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Economic Forum, Google, Facebook, and other large extraterritorial entities.
These unelected stakeholders played a large role during the pandemic, steering governments into adopting lockdowns.
He is absolutely correct. The puppet politicians had little to do with it. But behind the scenes a gigantic advertising campaign was playing out. The goal was the sell the vaccine into as many arms as possible by any means available.
That reminded me of something by Lex Weiser that laid out the psychology of the advertising campaign in excellent understandable terms
Lex Weiser explains the advertising campaign thusly:
“By the turn of the twenty-first century, researchers studying influence and persuasion had concluded that “six basic tendencies of human behavior come into play in generating a positive response: reciprocation, consistency, social validation, liking, authority, and scarcity.” These six methods provide a useful high-level framework for categorizing attempts at persuasion in the COVID vaccination campaign.
Reciprocation. It is a social norm that gifts should be repaid in kind (“I owe you a favor”). Therefore, even if subconsciously, the acceptance of an unsolicited present creates a sense of obligation. In the case of COVID, it could be argued that the $850 billion in direct payments made to US taxpayers stimulated the impulse to reciprocate this largesse by cooperating with the government’s vaccination effort.
Consistency. As recommended by HHS in 2020, the COVID vaccination campaign has used several messages (e.g., “safe and effective”) with extreme consistency. This repetition helps to anchor these concepts in the minds of the public, so that when they think of the vaccines, these positive phrases will be associated with them.
Social Validation. In times of uncertainty, people instinctively look to see what others are doing. This is why the perception of consensus is so persuasive. By classifying dissenting opinions by doctors and scientists as misinformation, public officials and news outlets did maintain a public consensus in favor of vaccination, but whether this backfired by undermining trust in media and authorities is yet to be determines.
Liking. Individuals are more likely to conform to expectations if they have affinity for the people telling them what to do. This persuasive method was used largely by the entertainment industry, with vaccine-positive messaging being promoted through celebrity endorsements, social media communications, and on programs hosted by popular entertainers such as Steve Colbert.
Authority. As demonstrated so compellingly by Stanley Milgram’s experiments, authority figures are highly influential. During the COVID pandemic, officials such as Dr. Fauci were key assets in the effort to overcome vaccine hesitancy.
Scarcity. The message that “supplies are limited” is often used in retail advertisements, and with good reason. Psychologists have concluded that the perception of scarcity is highly persuasive (Nicholson, 2018). The messaging that COVID vaccines were in short supply was repeated often, especially during the first few months that they were available.”
There was stick, carrot, stick, in my opinion. First came the psychological terror associated with every covid countermeasure which was employed globally. Not a single one of them from masks to social distancing to travel bans to shutting down schools and social events did a darned thing to control the virus threat. But they all did a fantastic job of controlling people and making their lives miserable.
I’d say a fair number of people would have done anything to get back to normal after the psychological trauma campaign of 2020 “Covid countermeasures.” Whether normal for them was visiting their elderly grandmother, playing in school sports, opening their restaurant without capacity restrictions, not wearing a facemask or going on a cruise is irrelevant. The advertising campaign of getting out of government induced Covid hell by getting the jabs worked wonders.
Then came the psychological advertising, which was the carrot end of the deal as mentioned explained in Lex Weiser’s post. Many people wanted to be good people and bought in.
For those still skeptical of operation Warp Speed injections, the stick was brought out at the end via mandates. At the same time evidence of jab injury and death was violently suppressed, not because it was untrue, but because it undermined getting everybody vaxxed.
Vaccinated with what? For what end purpose? It clearly didn’t stop Covid!
Did the government officials tell people to supplement with vitamin D or to exercise more and try to become a healthy weight? Did they admonish them not to panic and to fear not, as the Bible says 365 times, one for each day of the year? Did they ask them to hug their children and tell them that they loved them?
They did the exact opposite on every count, in country after country. It seems a little sinister.
Sadly it worked on many people. The ultimate price is still unknown. But can we start by making sure this never happens again?
Fear. The one thing we all underestimate in our own selves...Fear. Once you are afraid, your critical thinking part of your brain switches off...and it takes an absence of fear to swtich it back on...you can't force it to switch the fear off......you have to wait until something makes your brain not fear anymore.
We underestimate that to our peril.
I doubt there are statistics to validate my theory that many of the "anti- vaxxers" are people who would have been classified as "rebellious" types . You know, those who are/were called anti-authority.
Distrustful of people who have power and tell them "you have to do it" .
The refusal to be "persuaded" to go along with the crowd was never more rewarded than in this plandemic atrocity . Indeed, we who have refused may just be the last one's standing !
The thing I fear is that the Main Powers that Be ... the Monsters... ...... knew all along NOT to take the poison themselves. And they will now continue on with their evil to control all.