My cousin felt coerced into the first two conjabs and got so sick that she doesn’t want any more of them. My very devout former Catholic nun mother heard there was aborted fetal tissue in the shots and didn’t want anything to do with it. She reads the Bible every night and puts her relationship with God above what any priest says.
Some people have cited having superior natural immunity, low death rates from Covid in their age group, guidance from a higher power, or following scientists with plausible concerns about the vaccine rollout. The more conspiracy minded like myself thought the whole plandemic thing stunk to high heaven from day one and following on from that were very distrusting of all conjabs. Some like Steve Kirsch heard stories of injury and death and decided to investigate. Dr. Robert Malone wrote about his own injury following the conjab.
The FDA approved the EUA for conjabs for babies as young as six months old. Many who fought against it mourn this horrific decision. Some have not reached the acceptance stage of realizing that science is dead and regulatory approval is a rubber stamp.
I take solace that only 18% of parents polled planned on getting conjabs for their young children as soon as it was approved. That’s less than one in five. Twice as many said they do not plan on getting Covid “vaccines” at all for their kids. I would guess that these people are at least as motivated to keep the conjabs away from their kids as the crying mothers desperate for the shot are.
Something like 6% of the US population is quadruple jabbed, like Anthony Fauci, who tested positive for the coof. The numbers who are falling for this ruse are dropping with each successive round. It’s becoming a joke anymore.
But I’m curious what redpilled you on the Covid “vaccine.” The vast majority of those turning away from conjabs now are not “antivaxxers.” I know that because most people got most vaccines. I’d estimate that 90% of parents who became critical of vaccines were, like me, people whose child was injured by a jab.
I read scientific papers and research every vaccine on a case by case basis. A jab has to meet a pretty high standard for me to consider it, though some still do. My younger daughter got the BCG shot, for instance, which I consider better than most because it is a one time vaccine to protect against a bacteria which causes tuberculosis, a lung infection that kills millions of people worldwide every year. Science is an evolving process and I always welcome new information.
With conjabs I would have been skeptical and near the back of the line anyways due to my age, good health and questions about the narrative. I know that a lot of bad science is based on measuring surrogate markers, which is why my gold standard is always all cause mortality. Does this intervention lead to less death or more death?
So once the Pfizer and Moderna jab was rolled out to the elderly in January of 2021, I immediately jumped on the CDC weekly mortality dashboard. There was a huge spike in Covid deaths and non Covid deaths especially in the elderly, which was the targeted group for the first part of the vaccine rollout. I was sure that this jab was unsafe and ineffective. It looked like the worst in history. That was my case closed, but I was already redpilled and didn’t have to go through any stages of denial, depression, bargaining or anger to get there. I just wanted this thing away from my family. I have to let everybody else find their own way.
So what turned you against the Covid “vaccines”?
I am not an early adopter. I don’t install the brand new OS on my machines until they’ve aged sufficiently. Don’t fix what ain’t broke.
I read labels. Things from certain countries — like to the north of you — do not enter my or my families bodies as much as I have say over it.
Decades ago I was diagnosed with COPD. I took drugs that had no measurable effect on the disease. I took pages of measurements and worked with the doctor to frustratingly determine devices intended to measure airflow don’t likely measure anything. I broke that dependency chain.
I am responsible for my health, not any doctor. They listen to me not I them. From that comes why we wait.
I watched baffled as my PhD colleagues chatted giddily over when was this shot available. When can they get in the door when can they get on the list.
I watched the Weinstein/Kirsch/Malone 3 hour discussion and followed up on their assertions. They held water.
I found data. It said hold it.
My government said Thou Shalt. I showed it a finger.
And its all downhill from there ;)
1. I just waited to see how the new tech would fare.
2. I understood natural immunity, which I should have had.
3. Geert explained why the whole mass vaxxing into the middle of an active outbreak was doomed.
4. Dr. Peter explained the adverse events and the relative risk bullshit of the trials
5. The whole CVS/Walgreens thing was huge. I knew for sure that these min. wage people were not observing safety standards. (Just working in restaurants will explain that.)
6. Relentless pressure. Too much pressure. Everywhere. Something was amiss.
7. Researching the injections was like reading propaganda mixed with lawyer briefs.
8. Not stopping infection and transmission, and yet it was still being marketed and pushed as though it did.
9. It was clear that Fauci et. al were lying and lying and lying.
10. It was clear that doctors were lying and playing ball and being pressured.
Everything about it was off. Wrong. Panicky.