Keeping an Eye on CDC All Cause Mortality
Sometimes I like stepping back and seeing the big picture data. This is the CDC dashboard of deaths from all causes in the USA going back to 2018, with excess deaths 5% or more above threshold marked with red plus signs. As one can quickly note, excess deaths have occured basically every week since the March 2020 lockdowns.
This is a disaster. See the thing this chart doesn't show is the cumulative excess this caused, which was close to 500,000 people above baseline in the 2021 year of the vaccine (2.9 million expected deaths versus 3.4 million actual deaths). Take 2018 for example. There was a really bad flu season and excess deaths for a time, but what this chart doesn't show is that afterwards the death rate dropped well below expected levels for a while, so the overall death rate wasn't elevated. This is because most viruses burn out the dry tinder of the old and frail, leaving a healthier and often immune population in their aftermath. Of course we couldn't allow that to happen this time, and this is the net result.
I've highlighted in the black collumn late January of 2021, when all cause mortality rose above 40% for all ages. This coincided with the first part of the USA vaccine rollout, when it was being offered to seniors first, i.e. those over 65, and healthcare and front line workers. I segmented this out to seniors at the time there was a pronounced mass death of older folks from all causes. Covid deaths were also extremely elevated in these age groups.
That probably explains why the big pharma companies don't measure immunity until 14 days after the second dose, and count all deaths before then as unvaccinated. Pretty clever, huh? It makes for great CDC talking points with all those single jabbed 84 year olds dying of a stroke (or Covid) 7 days later being labelled as a pandemic of the unvaccinated.
Does anyone have an idea where the end to all these excess deaths are?
"Does anyone have an idea where the end to all these excess deaths are?"
Amy, I was first going to do a Bill Clinton "depending on what your definition of "end" is".
But Brian and Zool are right. My first thought is there will never be an end left up to those who skew the data. I also could envision some possible scenarios which might alter the course or time line "for better or worse" for some kind of ending. Some people, lets Bourla are taken out by some grieving spouse or parent for the vaccine injury or death from these fraudulent medical killler products. The same could happen to anyone in the vaccine industrial-regulatory complex for the same reason. Once private knowledge becomes common knowledge well just look at what happened to Harvey Weinstein. The skewers of the data have to make sure common knowledge doesn't happen. Critical Mass when uncontrolled chain reactions take over.
Where the end is? Depends on what you think is happening.
Is it mRNA experimentation on a wide scale and the science isn't completely understood and/or the body is too complex to be managed at that level so the deaths are the result of the margin of ignorance?
Is it planned democide (death by govt)?
Is it population reduction?
Is quackcination actually population/fertility control? Reduce births & reduce lifespan?
All of the above?
The refusal to allow early treatment combined with tunnel vision on quackcines and continued boosters suggests some if not all of the above.
Then it becomes a matter of which groups truly believe in quackcines and those that know its reality and at what pace do they want to achieve their objectives.