Murder Mysteries

A Best Things I've read on Substack Compilation

One thing that Sage Hana is right on with the conspiracy theorists out there is that there’s some people trying to kill us. I don’t think they try too hard to hide it anymore. They talk about equity and sustainability and about how if we don’t reduce the number of humans/CO2 output we’ll all die, and then they proceed to invent crisis that we need them to solve.

Just keep your head down and keep eating the Doritos.

But at the end of the day at the top you are usually just looking at good old fashioned killers, who have intent to kill and know what they are doing. So here’s a look at some of the wackier and more plausible conspiracy theories I’ve read in the past week. I’ve been in awe of some of the great substack writers that are able to move the dialogue forward.

Example one: The Titanic did not sink as a result of hitting an iceberg:

The Deadly Cost of Opposing the Federal Reserve System

This is great investigative work by A Lily Bit because for one thing I have never once before this heard of any alternative theory of the infamous Titanic sinking in 1912. The “Unsinkable” ship, as many of you probably know, sank on it’s maiden voyage in April of 1912, supposedly after hitting an iceberg did irreparable damage to the hull. The tragedy was compounded by there being not enough life rafts on board, leading to 1500 people dying in the near freezing seas that night. Of course the ship didn’t have enough life rafts because it was unsinkable anyways and yada yada yada. I’m sure a fair number of you have seen the movie and stuff.

Or was it? Could those people who met on Jekyl Island the year before to form the Federal Reserve have been trying to assassinate enemies and kill many birds with one stone? It seems surprisingly plausible. They had multiple motives and the means to do it.

A Lily Bit writes:

However, even worse news was on the way for J.P. Morgan and the White Star Line. The Olympic's devastation was far worse than anyone had anticipated. It didn't help things when the Olympic was engaged in another accident, this time with a partly submerged wreck. Although the damage caused by the Hawke incident had been repaired as good as possible, there were rumors circulating among the Harland and Wolfe workforce and White Star Line crews that not all was well with the Olympic. This appeared to be confirmed when it lost a propeller blade in the second incident, causing further severe vibrational damage to the already crippled ship. It is thought that the ship's keel was twisted and thus damaged beyond economical repair, essentially condemning her to the scrapyard. If this had been the case, the White Star Line would almost certainly have gone insolvent, given its current precarious financial position.

“…it took a fortnight of emergency patching to Olympic’s hull before she was in any fit state to attempt the journey from Southampton to Belfast for more complete repairs. Able to use only one main engine, the crippled liner made the voyage at an average speed of 10 knots, wasting the exhaust steam from the one usable engine. This steam would normally have driven the central turbine engine, which shows that this engine, its mountings or shafting had been damaged in the collision. As this engine sat on the centreline of the vessel, immediately above the keel, which the propeller shaft ran through, we can reasonably assume that the keel was damaged” — Robin Gardiner, “Titanic, the Ship that Never Sank?”

If Gardiner's theory is right, the roots were sown for a truly extraordinary event: the covert switching of the names of the two ships, Olympic and Titanic. Gardiner provides a lengthy list of credible sources in his well-researched writing. Testimonies, undeniable facts, and photographic evidence that would appear to point to the fact that the two ships were switched with the intention of staging an iceberg collision or other unknown fatal event, with the Titanic (originally the Olympic) and many of its passengers and crew being sacrificed in an audacious insurance scam that would save the White Star Line from financial ruin.

“Almost two months after the Hawke/Olympic collision, the reconverted Titanic, now superficially identical to her sister except for the C deck portholes, quietly left Belfast for Southampton to begin a very successful 25 year career as the Olympic. Back in the builders’ yard, work progressed steadily on the battered hulk of Olympic. The decision to dispose of the damaged vessel would already have been taken. It must have been obvious from quite early on that the vessel was beyond economical repair, so these repairs need not have been quite as thorough as they otherwise might have been. Instead of replacing the damaged section of keel, longitudinal bulkheads were installed to brace it”. — Robin Gardiner

In light of this statement, it is significant that when the Titanic's wreckage was first explored by Robert Ballard and his crew after its discovery in 1986, the first explorations of the wreckage revealed (completely undocumented in the ship's original blueprints) iron support structures in place that appeared to be supporting and bracing the keel. This was never satisfactorily explained, neither at the time nor later, but it would certainly be significant if correct, and there is no reason to believe it is not correct, as it was reported by the perplexed Ballard himself, who, of course, knew nothing (and probably still does not even now) about the alleged switching of the two ships' identities.

Meanwhile, in the United States, several influential individuals opposed the planned Federal Reserve Banking System. Among those who resisted the creation of this abomination were Benjamin Guggenheim, Isidor Strauss, and John Jacob Astor. These men were among the world's wealthiest, but their fortunes had been amassed through industrial, retail, and leisure interests rather than the financial sector, and they stood solidly in the way of the bankers' fraud scheme. In my opinion, if Morgan and the other collaborators came up with a really clever “kill two birds with one stone” answer, not only would White Star Line have handled the Olympic issue and thus its own financial problems, but J.P. Morgan would also have fulfilled his desire to see his proposal to create the Federal Reserve implemented.

All three of the aforementioned men (along with many other notable individuals at the time) were enticed to board the Titanic's now-hyped-to-be, highly prestigious maiden voyage in order to end their opposition to the Federal Reserve plans, and thus another reason for the ship's destruction was a stand-off between the mega-rich in which Guggenheim, Strauss, and Astor could be eliminated. They had to be destroyed in such a manner that no one would suspect homicide and that the real cause of their demise would be completely obscured. Simply arranging for all three men to have separate 'accidents' would have looked far too suspicious, so they had to be lured to the same place at the same time, and Titanic's pre-planned, ill-fated inaugural voyage provided the solution. Could this have been the real cause for the Titanic's pompous inaugural voyage, although the Olympic was given a much less recognized or flamboyant “send-off” on June 14, 1911, despite being the first one off the production line?

Morgan was supposed to be on the ship, but as was always planned, he had a “last-minute change of plan” due to a “bout of ill health’” and significantly failed to show up at Southampton at the appointed time, so his personal stateroom remained empty as the giant vessel pulled away from Southampton docks on the afternoon of the 10th April 1912, to the delight of the cheering multitudes on the quayside.

As a side note the song from Titanic “My Heart Will Go On” was the song that I was most requested to sing in Thailand. I match voices with probably vaccine injured Celine Dion very well. But I stopped singing it some years ago, because Oh loved it so much he sometimes even referred to himself as Jack Dawson and me as Rose from the movie.

I have a spoiler alert for anyone who hasn’t seen that 25 year old Titanic movie: Jack Dawson dies at the end of it. So after my husband Oh died I didn’t want that to be the love song anymore. I retired the song.

In another one from much more recent history was about how easy it would be to potentially change oxygen machines to only generate nitrogen, mimicking symptoms of Covid-19 and perhaps killing expectant mothers in order to get others coerced into the jab:

The War on Love: Were expectant mothers murdered in US hospitals to promote the Covid-19 agenda?

The article is extremely long with detailed research, so much so that Super Sally posted a cliffnotes version of it. But the gist is that pregnant unvaccinated women might have been targeted to die of “Covid” after being put on oxygen machines that delivered nitrogen in late 2021. These stories could then be fed into the media machine to ramp up the fear machine and promote getting vaccinated. It just goes with an added list of ways hospitals can kill you. As an added bonus in this case even staff and pregnant patients and their families would be none the wiser to what had happened.

I have been on the fence on the East Palestine, Ohio train derailment in February being any type of planned event. I have been much more curious about the response to it. The subsequent obvious cover up and dismissal of health concerns is just par for the course. But this article posted by Celia Farber and written by Eric Coppolino about the inconsistencies caught my attention:

Something Is VERY Wrong With The East Palestine Narrative—By Eric Coppolino

In it he writes:

The question I am seeking to answer is, re dump and burn, why was this decision made? Here are my story notes-in-progress, which I would summarize as, “Good morning, it's Opposite Day."

— There has never been a dump and burn in railroad history, even in the decade prior to its being banned by 1980 regulations. There is always dump and remove, or decant (into tankers) and remove. Spills happen every two weeks — the burn part is unprecedented and there is rarely a need to dump. The typical approach is to take the contaminated dirt to a hazardous waste landfill.

— A 2022 EPA guidance, which says how to interpret laws and regs, repeats the ban on dump and burn except only after careful consideration when there is absolutely no other alternative (which has never happened in civilian society; it happens in the military).

— Fully enclosed hazmat tanker truck driver recovery operation (entirely routine procedure when there are damaged tanker cars) was initiated the night of Friday Feb. 3 — and then called off within 24 hours (on Friday night or Saturday). Who called it off and why? 

— Fire lines pulled from keeping tankers cool.

— No samples of soot or wipe samples from inside the tanker cars — missing crucial data that would reveal the true nature of the incident.

— Point source soot samples are also missing. These would also be tell-all.

— Decision to breach, dump and burn was totally irrational and nobody understands it. The more experience people have, the less they understand it. EPA was involved; it cannot merely be a bystander.

— No state or federal emergencies were declared, depriving governments of emergency powers and agencies of certain kinds of authority (we now from “covid” how much power a state of emergency grants; in this case, that was never done).

— Analysis of samples from PTRMS lab (a high-end mobile chemistry analysis lab) are bogged at Carnegie Mellon, in custody of Albert Presto, who is not releasing them.

— Pressure release valves (PRVs) were working fine, per NTSB report; the tanker cars were not in jeopardy. Other reports say the VCM was not in jeopardy of exploding and besides, they can easily decanter it into tanker trucks as is done regularly.

— Five dead CTEH guys in airplane crash (eyewitnesses to point source sampling), who were at the East Palestine scene taking samples on behalf of the railroad and took samples…they died en route to the next mission.

— People are still sick in Palestine a way they should not be based on every other incident my source has worked on for 30 years. The other explanations are not very plausible, such as offgassing from stream aeration.

— Chemicals that are currently banned from production by federal law are DDT, PCBs, PBDEs, some CFCs, all chemical warfare agents and chemicals banned from production by voluntary agreement with chemical industry are PFOS and PFOA.

So what really happened? Apparently the only good investigative journalists are on substack.

Have you seen any good articles lately?

Buy me a ko-fi