Pfizer Documents Record 21% Miscarriage Rate, 2 Fetal Deaths, Rochelle Walensky Urges Every Pregnant Person to Get Vaccine Anyways

How Many Deaths Were Caused by This?

Sometimes the best defense is a good offense:

Crime Scene: ‘Mass Murderer’ Walensky’s Resignation Came Days After Incriminating Report Emerged

I still wonder if there will be any justice, or if it will just be another slink through the revolving door. Will the same old musical chairs will quietly open in another area?

As the Vigilant Fox writes:

“Dr. Walensky’s departure, we are told by the mainstream media, comes “at a good time” because of the WHO’s decision to end the COVID emergency. But what is not being reported is that Dr. Walensky’s resignation announcement also came just five days after a damning report revealed what she knew before she urged all women of childbearing age to get injected.”

“Of all the 69 reports we now have, this is the most disturbing,” expressed DailyClout CEO Dr. Naomi Wolf in a live stream Sunday, April 30.

In this report, which went viral last week (April 30), Pfizer Documents Analysis Project Director Amy Kelly detailed the “horrible damage to fetuses and babies,” as sourced from Pfizer’s Pregnancy and Lactation Cumulative Review:

• There were adverse events in over 54% of cases of “maternal exposure” to the vaccine (248 out of 458).

• There were “53 reports [or 21% – 53/248] of spontaneous abortion (51)/ abortion (1)/ abortion missed (1) following BNT162b2 (Pfizer mRNA) vaccination.”

• In this Review, six premature labor and delivery cases resulting in two newborn deaths were noted.

• 19% (41/215) of babies in Pfizer’s records exposed to the company’s COVID mRNA vaccine via their mothers’ breast milk were recorded as suffering from 48 different categories of adverse events.

Pfizer employee, Robert T. Maroko, rubberstamped the Review with these horrific findings on April 20, 2021.

And three days later, on April 23, 2021, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, “who ha[d] this report in hand,” emphasized Dr. Wolf on her Sunday live stream, held a press conference, which kicked off an aggressive campaign to get pregnant women vaccinated.

Here’s what she said:

“No safety concerns were observed for people vaccinated in the third trimester or safety concerns for their babies. As such, CDC recommends that pregnant people receive the COVID-19 vaccine.”

Here is Dr. Walensky again in September 2021, saying, “there is no bad time” for women to get vaccinated.

“Is it safe to get vaccinated while you’re breastfeeding?” asked Heidi Murkoff. “It absolutely is safe to get vaccinated,” answered CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky.

“So I would say if you are thinking about getting vaccinated, there is no bad time to get vaccinated. Get vaccinated while you’re thinking about having a baby, before you’re thinking about having a baby, while you’re pregnant with your baby, or after you’ve delivered your baby. There is no bad time!”

With a 54% rate of adverse events, at least two dead babies out of 248 cases, and an extremely high 21% miscarriage rate in Pfizer’s own document, urging pregnant “persons” to get the jab equates to premeditated murder to me. I’ve long urged people who are researching the not safety and not effectiveness of the so called Covid “vaccines” to stay away from blanket, absolutist statements such as “every woman who takes the jab will lose her baby or become infertile.” I understand that such alarmist headlines do provide clickbait. I also understand that the long term consequences of exposure to the vaccines is unknown and some experts have speculated that it is intended for widespread depopulation. I agree. But I think it is missing the forest from the trees because:

1. An absolutist statement can be refuted with ONE anecdote that bucks the trend. I know people who said that everybody who took the jabs would be dead in two years, yet I know many people who are alive and well 2+ years later. All a jabbed person needs to know in this case is one woman who got jabbed and gave birth to a perfectly healthy baby to discredit the entire not a movement.

2. In statistical terms, the actual harms and deaths that should have been anticipated from urging and in some cases mandating the vaccines will already number in the thousands, hundreds of thousands, and possibly millions for long term fertility damage. If Pfizer did a study for example where there is 1 excess death per 1000 people jabbed, that should be extrapolated out to the whole intended treatment population. So in my hypothetical example (assuming 1 billion people jabbed) that would equal 1 million excess deaths! Does that sound like mass murder? It should.

3. I think causing excess worry and even panic in loved ones who took the jabs undermines the cause and creates faultlines. It’s better to talk about it as a risk factor and look for ways to reduce risk from the prior exposure. Get everyone on the same side here.

I also think lawsuits have to begin on the basis of the people knowingly lying. You can go for the dumb plausible deniability spokesperson or media talking head paid to say whatever is put in front of them.

I noticed this one on Dr. McCullough’s substack:

State of California Found Guilty of Gross Human Rights Violations

In it John Leake writes:

“As I noted in my last post, the California state Reparations Task Force recently convened and published a document titled Meeting Materials. Chapter 16 of this document addresses California’s notorious eugenics program. As is noted on page 2 of the Chapter:

In 2003, the Legislature, Governor Gray Davis, and Attorney General Bill Lockyer all issued formal apologies for the 1909-1979 eugenics sterilization program that forcibly sterilized patients in state hospitals and homes without true consent.

On page three, the Task Force states that the State of California is responsible “for the perpetration of gross human rights violations” by performing thousands of forced sterilizations. A key element of the State’s culpability is, according to the Task Force, the lack of informed consent of the victims of the eugenics program.

It seems to me that the Task Force’s findings provide a precedent for a civil action against the State of California for mandating that health care workers receive the COVID-19 injections in order to retain their jobs.

Plaintiffs attorneys practicing in California should also investigate the likelihood that thousands of California residents were pressured to get the injections without informed consent.”

A sterilization and eugenics program, huh? Can we put these two things together?

Buy me a ko-fi