Why Do Only 10% to 35% of Household Members Get Covid?

If Germ Theory Works Like the Movies Always Taught Us it Did, Shouldn't We All be Sitting Ducks?

In the 1800's two prominent schools of thought emerged as to why people experienced disease and ill health. One was the germ theory promoted by Louis Pastuer. This was the idea that small particles in the air, food and water spread disease from person to person. Most of the premises of modern medicine are based on it, as are every well known Covid control measure.

The second theory, called the terrain theory, was promoted by Antoine Bechamp. This was the idea that unhealthy conditions both inside and outside of the body allowed diseases to proliferate in some people but not others, regardless of exposure. Most alternative health practices from taking vitamins to avoiding pesticides in food to blocking EMF are based on this theory.

I'm thinking we might have reached peak germ theory. There's too many plot holes to easily cover up. This Yahoo news article, which inadvertantly reveals that perhaps as few as 10% of household members get Covid, said it all:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/why-people-covid-others-house-233745929.html

The author got Covid over Christmas-despite being fully jabbed, yet did not spread it to her husband and children. The experts in the article of course advise isolating in a room, wearing a tight fitting N95 mask at all times (what about when you're eating or taking a shower or sleeping?) disinfecting shared surfaces and perhaps installing an air filter, since it spreads through the air. There is not a single thing in this article that remotely addresses mental health, strengthening your immune system, or taking any prophylactics to either manage Covid or to avoid getting it from a household members. 

Let's hop on the germ theory crazy train here:

The author believes in the PCR test, noting that she had seven positives. Presumably that means her children and husband's negative tests and lack of symptoms mean they don't have COVID. She then claims that perhaps her children had asymptomatic infection previously, but that antibody tests are unreliable. This is contradictory. Either you believe in the tests, or you don't.

She says she is both vaccinated and boosted, and got it anyways. Yet her kids, one of whom is too young to be vaccinated, did not get it. I love the cognitive dissonance.

If Covid is spread through the air then no mask will work in a household setting, unless you plan to not take it off for any reason whatsoever. That's assuming that masks work, which they don't.

Here's some things the article doesn't say or even think. 

1. Could the children have higher innate immunity due to their younger age or not triple jabbed status?

2. What other differences were there in personal health habits of household members? Were some taking vitamins or engaging in physical activity or going outdoors more often? Were there mental health differences that might have forced a healing response in the author but not others?

3. Could COVID be manifesting from a process inside the body and not be the result of transmission at all? This could happen because of spike proteins resonating from the jabs or even frequencies emitted over a type of interlocked grid. 

Germ theory was favored by medicine a few centuries ago because it was better for corporations. They could hide their pollution of the food, water and air under the guise of disease outbreaks. The cure for these thus labelled diseases could then be marketed under the guise of treating specific symptoms in isolation from everything else. The logical endpoint of this theory is to tape a plastic bag over your head so you don't exhale your disease on others. Of course, this will kill you.

But the elephant in the room has always been that even in conditions of 100% exposure, the germ doesn't spread to others in many cases. The theory doesn't fit the evidence and never has. 

I wonder if people will ever start paying attention…