Will There Ever Be Accountability?
Mainstream doctors are still arguing over who should get Covid Boosters
The six times Covid jabbed Las Vegas roommate Paul is still, quite curiously, alive. The 71 year old has also been jabbed for the flu and pneumonia and God knows what else in the last three years. I don’t think his continued survival is a great advertisement for Big Pharma though: he had a heart attack (95% aortic occlusion) last December, his hands shake and he sometimes involuntarily loses control of his movements, and he’s spent a few months in rehabilitation facilities. From my vantage point his health is poor and he has been on a steady decline, probably at least partially due to poisoning from the jabs and all of the prescriptions that he takes daily.
I have warned many conspiracy theory types to stay away from absolute statements such as “Everybody who received the Covid vaccine will be dead in two years” or “Every woman who got the jab will be rendered permanently infertile.” It easily discredits the movement because such an absolute statement takes ONLY ONE PERSON to buck the trend and everything else that is said can be thrown out wholesale. A lot of people were jabbed more than two years ago and are alive and a lot of women who took one or more of these jabs have gone on to have successful pregnancies and give birth to seemingly healthy children. A 15% decline in births in a given country (which is catastrophic), say, still indicates that 85% of total expected births happened. Almost certainly some of those babies were born to jabbed and boosted women. A 15% increase over expected mortality (which is also catastrophic) still means that most people lived.
This is a nefariously clever way by Big Pharma to undermine the not a movement. By giving free range to the most vocal doomsayers a criminal amount of death and destruction can be swept under the rug. Because the vaccine didn’t kill or injure everyone, it didn’t kill or injure anyone. Murdering the world is hard, and perhaps their poison did not work out as well as they had hoped. But take these individual cases as individual cases.
From Paul’s vantage point, steeped as he is in constant television advertisements, these little health problems he has are just a fact of life while aging. He knows that I am an antivaxxer who is especially opposed to the Covid jabs. He has answers that not only absolve Big Pharma of any blame for his medical conditions, but which heap praise on the brave doctors who he feels have saved his life. One doctor apparently told him that the only reason he had lived through his heart attack was because he already was on blood thinners. The roommate mentioned that both his father and one of his brothers died of heart attacks before they had reached his age. In his eyes none of his health problems have anything to do with the Covid jabs, and how could I prove otherwise? He will go to the grave praising safe and effective and in the the afterlife he will likely thank the Covid jabs and other pharma concoctions for giving him extra years over some of his relatives.
What appears so blatantly to me to be a mass poisoning of the people for profit motives is in Paul’s eyes life saving interventions. The jabs, it seems, will continue. Yep, they’re still doing it:
I found it ridiculous that the Covid boosters are still debated by actual doctors, but if Paul was your patient and he dutifully pressed about wanting it, what would you do? Adam Cifu decided to analyze a recently published booster study. I don’t think you need a pHD to see how laughably bad this is:
“A Critical Appraisal
Undervaccination and severe COVID-19 outcomes: meta-analysis of national cohort studies in England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales was published in The Lancet on 1/15/2024. It is a well done, observational study of (almost) the entire population of The United Kingdom. Unfortunately, it doesn’t answer the question of whether to support COVID boosters in the winter of 2024 as it compared severe COVID outcomes (hospitalization and death) between 6/1/22 and 9/30/22 in people who were “fully vaccinated” vs. those who were “undervaccinated” as of June 1, 2022.”
I have no idea why they are relying on data that is almost two years old except as a means to muddy the waters. That’s hardly the only thing wrong with this blatant GIGO (garbage inputs, garbage outputs) analysis. They’ve apparently lumped “undervaccinated” with “fully vaccinated.” Based on all cause mortality data, those who recieved one dose of the Covid jab had the highest death rates in England. Perhaps they were too injured or dead to take a second dose. And what were they measuring? This seems like the best way to do it:
“Exposure was measured as doses of vaccine recorded in the medical record. Outcomes were as follows:
A severe COVID-19 outcome was defined as COVID-19 hospitalisation or death. COVID-19 hospitalisation was defined as hospitalisation with … codes for COVID-19 recorded as the first cause of admission and the admission recorded as an emergency in the secondary care records. COVID-19 death was defined as death with … COVID-19 recorded as the underlying cause of death.
(I would have preferred overall hospitalization and overall mortality, but you get you get what you get…).”
Dr. Cifu seems to be treating this propaganda pharma piece as though it is worthy of a genuine analysis. They didn’t measure all cause mortality, just whether someone was coded as a Covid hospitalization or death. This was conveniently used as another way to hide the bodies for a time in late 2021 and early 2022. Those who were unvaccinated or undervaccinated were treated very poorly and some were iatrogenocided away due to hospital procedures. And why did one dose increase the odds of catching Covid, again?
I guess my point is that actual mainstream medical doctors are still plowing ahead with these things. Do you have any suggestions on how to make them stop?
I know some people who will never change their minds on the current path. The only hope is healing them, methinks…
I do, indeed, have some thoughts on how to make the actual medical doctors who are plowing ahead with the COVID bioweapons stop.
For reference, I am an actual medical doctor (licensed in 2 US States).
Blanket liability exemption fuels practices dangerous to patients but beneficial to doctors. For example, routine vaccination can credibly be seen (per Andrew Moulden and many others) as harming every single recipient to one degree or another).
There is no question in my mind that the liability exemption shield has been pierced by willful negligence. Criminal charges must be brought against not only the pharma lynchpins and government enablers, but also against doctors whose own records show an increase in POTENTIALLY jab-related harms since these doctors either knew, or should have known, that they were engaging in a practice which was harming their patients, or was likely to harm them.
Forget about meaningless oaths sworn at graduation (if you want to see just how meaningless, check out the nauseating University of Pittsburg Medical Oath). Doctors have legal responsibilities to refrain from harm and to report harm when they see it being done.
Mr/Mrs/Ms Prosecutiing Attorney, Attorney General, when the harms became obvious to a licensed practitioner, did they report the harms to VAERS, AS REQUIRED BY LAW, did they cease the practice, AS REQUIRED BY LAW, did they report the suspected cause of harm, AS REQUIRED BY LAW, did they file a report with the manufacturer, their State Board, their specialty board, their hospital, WITH ANYONE?????
And did they inform the patient, in writing, that the procedure being recommended was, in the clinical judgement of the physician, risky, and tell them why, in detail, and obtain fully informed consent, AS REQUIRED BY LAW?
Prosecute these doctors for both crimes under their State statutes, but also for crimes against humanity, which is covered under the Federal legislation secondary to our ratification of the Convention on Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity.
How about this: In the US, at least, pediatricians not only use vaccine administration as a profit center, they are also commonly rewarded by Merck, for example, with enormous per patient bonuses if their entire practice is jabbed beyond a certain percentage (65%, I believe).
This is a kickback. Kickbacks are illegal. Some prosecuting attorney with both balls and a personal commitment to this topic needs to prosecute a group of very high profile pediatricians in his state.
Since the hospitals were being induced to include diagnoses pursuant to selective remuneration for those diagnoses, this is also criminal behavior.
Just a couple of good prosecutions, and we will see a MAJOR change in behavior.
Re: I guess my point is that actual mainstream medical doctors are still plowing ahead with these things. Do you have any suggestions on how to make them stop?
There is no way stopping them. This one product has paved the way for a completely new paradigm of developing, funding, distributing and administering any substances called “drugs”. The immunity to all participants in the distribution chain reinforced the imagined superiority of healthcare workers above everybody else. It is the circle which needs only one small point to be complete: “trust” of lay people to do whatever they are told no questions asked. This is why this aspect has been no. 1 project for years.
Even if people stop visiting them and stop needing any drugs, they will push on. The new medical clan fight to split the new cake. After 4 years of causing huge health injuries and a lot of deaths, with practically no-one pursuing compensation directly from them, they now feel to be above the law and beyond the reach of their victims. They cannot stop. They only need about 8 years more of continued pushing to reprogram social perception, let lots of adults die, and leave the young generations (who are more or less oblivious to the covidgate) completely helpless and defenseless. This period, now, is only a prelude.