20 Million Dead and 2.2 Billion Vaccine Injured Since Covid Jab Rollout

Is There a Difference Between mRNA and "Traditional" Jabs?

20 million saved or 20 million killed

A recent article by Peter Halligan estimated 20 million dead and 2.2 billion injured from Covid “vaccines worldwide. His article is partially a response to a Lancet estimate that the miracle jabs saved 20 million people worldwide, which is laughable on its face. If it had wouldn’t we be seeing decreased all cause mortality and less Covid, instead of the opposite? The Lancet estimate of lives saved was based on some real generous assumptions: that the jabs are perfectly safe and near 100% effective, for example, and that this efficacy does not wane over time. It is a garbage inputs, garbage outputs sham study on the same order of magnitude as Neil Fergusan’s Covid deaths estimates early in the pandemic.

I hopped over to see how Peter Halligan came up with his 20 million dead and 2.2 billion injured after Covid injections figures.

“A reminder of the logic that the injections have killed 20 million people.

Add the EUDRA and VAERS adverse event data on deaths and “events” together, multiply by an under-reporting factor of 40, globalize the EU+US one eighth share of 12.5 billion global doses.

VAERS (take only the US data) 13,972 deaths and 854,084 adverse reactions to 5 August 2022

VAERS Summary for COVID-19 Vaccines through 8/5/2022 – VAERS Analysis

EUDRA (ignore the headline and scoot to the first image on the landing page) 46,999 deaths and 4,731,833 injuries

76,789 Deaths 6,089,773 Injuries Reported in U.S. and European Databases Following COVID-19 Vaccines - Vaccine Impact

Number of US injections = around 600m (increased to 608 million in the last few weeks)

CDC COVID Data Tracker: Vaccinations in the US

Number of EU injections = around 900m (increased to 915 million in the last few weeks)

Number of global injections = around 12 billion (increased to 12.5 billion in the last few weeks)

Coronavirus (COVID-19) Vaccinations - Our World in Data

The Lazarus Report showing less than one in 100 vaccination injuries are reported - see page 6 of 7 here that states “..fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. Low reporting rates preclude or slow the identification of “problem” drugs and vaccines that endanger public health.”

Electronic Support for Public Health–Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (ESP:VAERS) (ahrq.gov)

Using a one in 100 under-reporting factor (URF) would make the injections horribly deadly and injurious (1.4 million deaths and 85 million injuries for the 600 million doses administered).

A more recent attempt at estimating the URF is around 40, here:

Determining the VAERS Under-Reporting Multiplier (healthimpactnews.com)

So, EU+US deaths = 13,972 + 46,999 = 60,971 deaths

and EU+US injuries = 854,084 + 6,089,773 = 6,943,857 (multiple per person, half of which are “serious”).

Multiply by 40 for URF and then by 8 to “globalize”

Global deaths are around 19.5 million SO FAR and global injuries are around 2.2 billion.”

So Halligan used the basic logic of extrapolating death and injury numbers from VAERS and Eudravigilance and then multiplying them out by the underreporting factor and the worldwide total doses given. The URF of 41 has been cited by Steve Kirsch and many others, though I think it is a bit low and there is variation in underreporting, i.e. miscarriage is more likely to not be reported than anaphylactic shock, and near term deaths are much much more likely to be reported than those that occur months or years later. By my estimates this would work out to 1 dead per 5,818 doses given.

The CDC has tried to assail VAERS based on two contradictory claims. The first is that “Anyone can file a VAERS report,” implying that some antivaxxers with axes to grind might be randomly inflating numbers with “I saw on the Internet that somebody died and I think he was vaccinated” type of things. They never mention that it is a crime to file a false VAERS report or that 80% are done by healthcare professionals.

Regarding VAERS reports done by medical professionals the CDC likes to say that “correlation does not equal causation” and imply that these people must report everything even if they know the death could not possibly be related to the vaccine. They never mention the uncompensated time that would be lost by doctors and nurses filing these reports or the fact that there is no penalty for not reporting even an obvious safety signal. Instead mainstream media runs ground cover propaganda on this: we are supposed to imagine an overworked medical professional, hands tied by stupid laws, who writes up “this patient was struck by lightning 10 days after a Covid vaccine.” She rolls her eyes on camera, knowing full well that these two events could not possibly be related. In this episode some shady journalist antivaxxer runs with her report and engages in a witch hunt. I’ve just written the latest episode plotline of Fill-in-the-Blank medical drama series. Where’s my paycheck from the Department of Defense?

A lot of Internet trolls have run with this straw man argument for years, implying that people getting hit by a bus, say, are filling up vaccine adverse event reports. There’s relatively few causes of death, e.g. homicide or getting struck by lightning, that are absolutely positively unrelated to the jabs. On camera compilations of people dying suddenly after collapsing has borne this out. This could be marked as a drowning death if they were swimming or as a car accident if they were driving a car at the time of the seizure. But what caused the seizure?

Then the CDC also states that this is the most intensely monitored vaccine campaign in history, implying that they are combing through reports. Many health care professionals do not know about it, many patients do not know about it, and it takes a lot of time to file a report. The system crashes and the CDC might be throttling reports that do make it through. As I noted a few days ago, Brian Shillavy found 119,000 adverse events to Covid vaccines PRIOR to 2020.

The second part of Peter Halligan’s estimate is based on the assumption that all of the many different forms of Covid “vaccines” deployed around the world are leading to roughly the same number of adverse events and deaths. This is more contentious as one can see a pivot from Covid mRNA jabs by Pfizer and Moderna bad but “traditional vaccines” like China’s Sinovac and Russia’s Sputnik V still “good.” Yesterday I perused the twitter thread for Pfizer (listed in S&P 500—wonder how their share price is doing) and the overwhelming majority of comments were regarding jab injuries and deaths. The same was true on the thread regarding Moderna. The worm has turned to very negative reviews of their “safe and effective” products.

This was not the case for Novovax, which uses insect fragments to hypothetically stimulate immune response. People on that thread, many of whom seemed genuine, spoke of this new Covid jab in positive terms. They wanted this to be their booster or had no side effects after their jab of it. Whether this is a pharma backed bot operation is irrelevant. Globalcorp is trying to salvage the reputation of some “vaccines” by sacrificing others. This allows a slow walk back by the rabidly pro jab, who might eventually sheepishly admit that the mRNA shots were too warp speeded but the good old fashioned vaccine technology is still the bees knees. The collapse in trust threatens the entire vaccine paradigm otherwise. Dr. Robert Malone, already smeared as a misinformation spreader, might get to be a whipping boy twice over his invention of mRNA technology.

Being on the ground in Thailand where Chinese made Sinovac was mostly deployed at first along with some Astra Zeneca I do not believe that ANY of these jabs are safe. Ambulance sirens spiked after their first jab rollout, I have a friend who took two Sinovac jabs and now has Parkinson’s like tremors, and deaths are rising and births are dropping in Thailand. I covered that here myself.

So what do all of these Covid “vaccines” have in common? The spike protein is always the targeted part of the virus. This Nature article cites the spike protein, noting thusly:

“mRNA, adenoviral vector as well as inactivated whole-virus vaccines are now in widespread use, and a subunit vaccine is in a final stage of authorization. They all rely on the native viral spike protein (S) of SARS-CoV-2 for inducing potently neutralizing antibodies, but the presentation of this key antigen to the immune system differs substantially between the different categories of vaccines.”

Could something to do with the spike protein be why they really needed jabs in everyone’s arms around the world, regardless of the delivery method of it? Dr. Mike Yeadon has noted that there were several better candidate molecules in the SARS-CoV-2 virus for vaccine development. So why was this one chosen by every jab manufacturer around the world? Wasn’t that also the specific thing about Covid that supposedly made it so dangerous and also the same part that might have been cut and pasted in a bioweapons lab?

Some people are getting into a contrarian hero ball that I find laughable. They seem to be rooting for China’s Sinovac or Russia’s Sputnik V jabs as though those are superior to American mRNA technology. This is a limited hangout psyop. Somehow we are supposed to believe that Russia and China, two countries with a recent 20th Century history of mass genocide, really, really care about their citizens so much that they would only use the safest technology. I’m guessing that reporting is near nonexistent instead. Dispatches from Russia guy Edward Slavsquat covered this well:

Sputnik V: It's what "alt media" craves!

So basically there is no reporting from Russia of jab injuries or deaths. They don’t track it. I’m not going to be lining up for a Sputnik V jab anytime soon, or Sinovac, Novavax, Moderna, AZ or Pfizer. Pick your poison indeed.

Do you think there is any meaningful difference among all of these jabs? That’s going to be the next pivot…

Buy me a ko-fi