I agree none of the elixirs are safe. I recall many conversations with friends in Thailand, whereby they'd say "but Sinovac seems alright, then I'll be able to travel..." Managed to 'save' a few and talked them out of it.
Friends and I in Bangkok have all noticed a significant spike in ambulances tearing up and down sukhumvit day and night. Anecdotally, friends tell me horror stories of their colleagues & students with ADR such as compressed nerves, can't move their left arm, cancer diagnoses / tumours for young twenty-somethings, the list goes on.
Read and commented on :-) The telegraph piece was drawn to my attention yesterday when off-guardian.org telegram group pinned it and wrote "Because THIS is the amount of stupid our betters now think they can feed us."
The ambulances running up and down Thepkrassatri never went back down to baseline pre Covid numbers. Now they just upgraded to a new quieter ambulance instead. Are people still getting jabs and boosters? The folks I know in Phuket got off that bandwagon...
A friend shared an infographic that was sent around his office a few weeks ago encouraging everyone to go for their 6th injection (4th booster after the initial two stabs). Apparently there was great enthusiasm from all except my friend.
Sad. Perhaps it's a big city thing. Phuket went all in at first but now the more laid back beachy vibes are coming through. A lot more Thais are even taking their facemasks off!
Dr. Luc Montagnier, Nobel Prize winning virologist, said that all the animals in the trials died, and that was enough for me to be convinced two years ago.
20 million may end up being an underestimate, with all the downstream effects. It may end up being in Brother Bugnolo territory.
Nevertheless, life goes on. The perpetrators will get what they deserve.
There are 2 main problems with mRNA-based vaccines -- the lipid nanoparticles and the spike protein. LNPs are clearly toxic (Moderna never got any of their LNPs through animal toxicity trials). The spike protein, in my opinion, is pathogenic on several fronts (clotting, autoimmunity, neurodegenerative, and epigenetic=cancer). Spike protein is a bad target because it changes quickly, hence the ongoing rabbit hole game of boosters for new variants. mRNA-based vaccines also seem to provide fleeting protection in the order of weeks. And with each injection...dose-related illness and death.
The US went with mRNA-based vaccines because NIH holds the patent for stabilized spike protein which causes a "better" antibody response, along with greater chance for adverse effects.
China and Russia likely went with "old technology" because they do not have appropriate infrastructure to make mRNA-based vaccines. These vaccines are also much cheaper to produce and distribute. The may "last longer", but they carry the same risk as other vaccines because the spike protein is itself pathogenic.
Well written and a good point. They are all, pretty much every government, on the pandemic technology ride to the global panopticon, enthusiastically. They think it is the key to their eternal rule and riches.
It is odd that they all chose the spike protein. Perhaps there is some electrochemical or electomagnetic technology in play that exploits unique or unusual characteristic of the spike protein. The public record of scientific articles on spike protein (s) is huge, yet seems to also contain a large hidden component of unpublished classified papers. One can deduce from the pattern of published papers that there's hidden funding and information on s. Presumably DARPA or BARDA or some other child-agency of DARPA. In that world DARPA scientists typically work on dual-use projects yet only publish papers only in the civilian sector. The most important advances in certain fields are only documented in classified papers that we don't generally have access to.
I'm unaware of any really distinctive & unique characteristic of s that merits this obsession with it in the DARPA clones. Is anyone reading this familiar enough with this scientific literature to know why? E.g. Is s the payload or it a vector for another heretofore unknown payload? Is it just a marketing gimic? E.g. Does s have e-m vibration characteristics suitable for two way data exchange with graphene (hydro)oxide structures? E.g. Perhaps s isn't really important and the real payload is something not yet publicly known. Theories abound.
Second question, and a weird one, for anyone who has read this far: Is anyone aware of a tie-in between spike protein and Two Dimensional Electron Gas (2DEG)? DARPA seems to have a mature (since the mid-1990s) communication protocol that operates via topological solitons (c.f. FQHE) interacting in a 2DEG. 2DEG's occur in nature (e.g. the Earth's magnetopause) and have been built in labs since 1968. Graphene is known to demonstrate 2DEG characteristics at room temperature, including support for the topological form of the Fractional Quantum Hall Effect (FQHE). Might the presence of s, or specific structures therein, provide an e-m resonance useful for data interchange between two communication protocols, specifically between DARPA's 'dancing soliton' protocol and standard spread spectrum RF? [I know this is a highly specialized question and don't seriously expect an answer. On first and second attempts I was unable to perform the correct calculations - it seems a difficult but not intractable Physics problem. ]
Wow! Those are great questions that I don't have answers to. I did know that graphene behaves differently at room or body temperature than in ultra cold storage. Has anyone independently analyzed jab vials from all the different formulations?
We have quite a few 'pirate analysts' who claim to have performed various analyses of various formulations. I've seen info that claimed to be A-Z, J-J, and Pfizer. I've not seen any original data so it's all hearsay that's heavily and aggressively censored. Pretty much all of them claimed to find assorted nanostructures, with considerable commonalities in findings. Quite possibly there's some sort of graphene oxide and/or graphene hydroxide strctures that form, given time, in the presence of the proper temperature and elecrochemical field.
Given the known timeline of advances involving graphene, combined with known or strongly-supsected DARPA capabilities, such a technology probably became viable for a baby-DARPA project circa 2013. Typically it would have been an exploratory project with a team of 4 - 6 cross-disciplinary subject matter experts connected by a solid budget and a travel agency, operating over an 18-24 month timeline. If it was successful and spawned follow up projects then a given technology could have been ready for prime time circa 2018. I have no personal knowledge of whether such a project was attempted, nor whether it might have succeeded. But it could have started circa 2013 and probably not much before ...
The (unreliable and questionable) analyses I've seen suggest these possibilities:
* Perhaps there's no nanotech in that stuff. I don't know.
* One possibility is G-O based nanotech that forms a neural link with read-write interface to the animal host's neural system. This theory is consistent with self-assembling nanostructures reported by multiple investigators most of whom were censored and several of whom seem to have been killed. This is a theoretical wifi remote-control and surveillance system injected into the host animal's body via self-assembling nanotech that intersects the central nervous system. Such technology was well within the capacity of i.e. DARPA to attempt ten years ago. I've no idea if this has actually been done.
* Another possibility is an installed mechanical 'kill switch' based on G-HO (graphene hydroxide). This might coagulate in the form of sheets of electrically-sensitive graphene roughly 10 x 50 nanometers and one atom thick. Once millions of these are in a host body nothing much happens UNLESS just the correct spread spectrum RF pattern is applied in which case these graphene sheets become tiny rotating razor blades. I've not been able to determine the RF power required to cause this theoretical effect but back-of-napkin guestimating puts it well within the capacity of widely deployed off-the-shelf gear.
* Another variant of kill switch receives a specific per-host RF pattern that causes a subtle change that activates prion factories. This might have a mean 100 day delayed effect, which might be fine. Accidental actuation and/or tests of such a theoretical mechanism of action might explain the increased, yet still quite low, observed rate of prion disease in the experimental group. Or not. I've no evidence such a mechanism exists.
* There's no reason not to adopt a 'kitchen sink' approach. Include a (beta stage!) CNS-control system, a generic mechanical fast kill switch actuated by specific strong resonant spread spectrum RF, and a slow biochemical kill switch activated by an organism-unique RF pattern.
What other deviltry can people think up that is consistent with reported (unverified) results, theoretically possible via existing DARPA tech, and of interest to our wannabe lords and masters? All theoretically, of course ...
The capacity exists and what can be done probably has been tried. Of course the theoretical becomes a different animal when dealing with a live conscious human being, which is what I am fascinated by. I'm in short amazed by the living: sure there were probably experiments within experiments with varying formulations and whatnot. Yes you bring up graphene, kill switches, and nanotech perhaps triggered by perhaps wifi remote or such. But why do some people live? How do some who clearly got the worst batches, say, survive? To put it another way let's imagine a hypothetical sports team where the team doctor jabbed all with the same horrible batch on the same day. They now go into a stadium and a wifi kill switch is triggered. I've seen sports stars dropping but I haven't seen that one yet...I hope I don't!
Interesting numbers there, the death toll will continue to mount. The Telegraph thinks us so stupid that we'll fall for this: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/10/11/video-games-could-trigger-heart-attacks-children/?s=08
I agree none of the elixirs are safe. I recall many conversations with friends in Thailand, whereby they'd say "but Sinovac seems alright, then I'll be able to travel..." Managed to 'save' a few and talked them out of it.
Friends and I in Bangkok have all noticed a significant spike in ambulances tearing up and down sukhumvit day and night. Anecdotally, friends tell me horror stories of their colleagues & students with ADR such as compressed nerves, can't move their left arm, cancer diagnoses / tumours for young twenty-somethings, the list goes on.
Just ran a post on this, you want a credit, NIcholas?
Read and commented on :-) The telegraph piece was drawn to my attention yesterday when off-guardian.org telegram group pinned it and wrote "Because THIS is the amount of stupid our betters now think they can feed us."
The ambulances running up and down Thepkrassatri never went back down to baseline pre Covid numbers. Now they just upgraded to a new quieter ambulance instead. Are people still getting jabs and boosters? The folks I know in Phuket got off that bandwagon...
A friend shared an infographic that was sent around his office a few weeks ago encouraging everyone to go for their 6th injection (4th booster after the initial two stabs). Apparently there was great enthusiasm from all except my friend.
Sad. Perhaps it's a big city thing. Phuket went all in at first but now the more laid back beachy vibes are coming through. A lot more Thais are even taking their facemasks off!
Dr. Luc Montagnier, Nobel Prize winning virologist, said that all the animals in the trials died, and that was enough for me to be convinced two years ago.
20 million may end up being an underestimate, with all the downstream effects. It may end up being in Brother Bugnolo territory.
Nevertheless, life goes on. The perpetrators will get what they deserve.
There are 2 main problems with mRNA-based vaccines -- the lipid nanoparticles and the spike protein. LNPs are clearly toxic (Moderna never got any of their LNPs through animal toxicity trials). The spike protein, in my opinion, is pathogenic on several fronts (clotting, autoimmunity, neurodegenerative, and epigenetic=cancer). Spike protein is a bad target because it changes quickly, hence the ongoing rabbit hole game of boosters for new variants. mRNA-based vaccines also seem to provide fleeting protection in the order of weeks. And with each injection...dose-related illness and death.
The US went with mRNA-based vaccines because NIH holds the patent for stabilized spike protein which causes a "better" antibody response, along with greater chance for adverse effects.
China and Russia likely went with "old technology" because they do not have appropriate infrastructure to make mRNA-based vaccines. These vaccines are also much cheaper to produce and distribute. The may "last longer", but they carry the same risk as other vaccines because the spike protein is itself pathogenic.
"It might choke Artie but it's not going to choke Stymie."
Well written and a good point. They are all, pretty much every government, on the pandemic technology ride to the global panopticon, enthusiastically. They think it is the key to their eternal rule and riches.
It is odd that they all chose the spike protein. Perhaps there is some electrochemical or electomagnetic technology in play that exploits unique or unusual characteristic of the spike protein. The public record of scientific articles on spike protein (s) is huge, yet seems to also contain a large hidden component of unpublished classified papers. One can deduce from the pattern of published papers that there's hidden funding and information on s. Presumably DARPA or BARDA or some other child-agency of DARPA. In that world DARPA scientists typically work on dual-use projects yet only publish papers only in the civilian sector. The most important advances in certain fields are only documented in classified papers that we don't generally have access to.
I'm unaware of any really distinctive & unique characteristic of s that merits this obsession with it in the DARPA clones. Is anyone reading this familiar enough with this scientific literature to know why? E.g. Is s the payload or it a vector for another heretofore unknown payload? Is it just a marketing gimic? E.g. Does s have e-m vibration characteristics suitable for two way data exchange with graphene (hydro)oxide structures? E.g. Perhaps s isn't really important and the real payload is something not yet publicly known. Theories abound.
Second question, and a weird one, for anyone who has read this far: Is anyone aware of a tie-in between spike protein and Two Dimensional Electron Gas (2DEG)? DARPA seems to have a mature (since the mid-1990s) communication protocol that operates via topological solitons (c.f. FQHE) interacting in a 2DEG. 2DEG's occur in nature (e.g. the Earth's magnetopause) and have been built in labs since 1968. Graphene is known to demonstrate 2DEG characteristics at room temperature, including support for the topological form of the Fractional Quantum Hall Effect (FQHE). Might the presence of s, or specific structures therein, provide an e-m resonance useful for data interchange between two communication protocols, specifically between DARPA's 'dancing soliton' protocol and standard spread spectrum RF? [I know this is a highly specialized question and don't seriously expect an answer. On first and second attempts I was unable to perform the correct calculations - it seems a difficult but not intractable Physics problem. ]
Wow! Those are great questions that I don't have answers to. I did know that graphene behaves differently at room or body temperature than in ultra cold storage. Has anyone independently analyzed jab vials from all the different formulations?
We have quite a few 'pirate analysts' who claim to have performed various analyses of various formulations. I've seen info that claimed to be A-Z, J-J, and Pfizer. I've not seen any original data so it's all hearsay that's heavily and aggressively censored. Pretty much all of them claimed to find assorted nanostructures, with considerable commonalities in findings. Quite possibly there's some sort of graphene oxide and/or graphene hydroxide strctures that form, given time, in the presence of the proper temperature and elecrochemical field.
Given the known timeline of advances involving graphene, combined with known or strongly-supsected DARPA capabilities, such a technology probably became viable for a baby-DARPA project circa 2013. Typically it would have been an exploratory project with a team of 4 - 6 cross-disciplinary subject matter experts connected by a solid budget and a travel agency, operating over an 18-24 month timeline. If it was successful and spawned follow up projects then a given technology could have been ready for prime time circa 2018. I have no personal knowledge of whether such a project was attempted, nor whether it might have succeeded. But it could have started circa 2013 and probably not much before ...
The (unreliable and questionable) analyses I've seen suggest these possibilities:
* Perhaps there's no nanotech in that stuff. I don't know.
* One possibility is G-O based nanotech that forms a neural link with read-write interface to the animal host's neural system. This theory is consistent with self-assembling nanostructures reported by multiple investigators most of whom were censored and several of whom seem to have been killed. This is a theoretical wifi remote-control and surveillance system injected into the host animal's body via self-assembling nanotech that intersects the central nervous system. Such technology was well within the capacity of i.e. DARPA to attempt ten years ago. I've no idea if this has actually been done.
* Another possibility is an installed mechanical 'kill switch' based on G-HO (graphene hydroxide). This might coagulate in the form of sheets of electrically-sensitive graphene roughly 10 x 50 nanometers and one atom thick. Once millions of these are in a host body nothing much happens UNLESS just the correct spread spectrum RF pattern is applied in which case these graphene sheets become tiny rotating razor blades. I've not been able to determine the RF power required to cause this theoretical effect but back-of-napkin guestimating puts it well within the capacity of widely deployed off-the-shelf gear.
* Another variant of kill switch receives a specific per-host RF pattern that causes a subtle change that activates prion factories. This might have a mean 100 day delayed effect, which might be fine. Accidental actuation and/or tests of such a theoretical mechanism of action might explain the increased, yet still quite low, observed rate of prion disease in the experimental group. Or not. I've no evidence such a mechanism exists.
* There's no reason not to adopt a 'kitchen sink' approach. Include a (beta stage!) CNS-control system, a generic mechanical fast kill switch actuated by specific strong resonant spread spectrum RF, and a slow biochemical kill switch activated by an organism-unique RF pattern.
What other deviltry can people think up that is consistent with reported (unverified) results, theoretically possible via existing DARPA tech, and of interest to our wannabe lords and masters? All theoretically, of course ...
The capacity exists and what can be done probably has been tried. Of course the theoretical becomes a different animal when dealing with a live conscious human being, which is what I am fascinated by. I'm in short amazed by the living: sure there were probably experiments within experiments with varying formulations and whatnot. Yes you bring up graphene, kill switches, and nanotech perhaps triggered by perhaps wifi remote or such. But why do some people live? How do some who clearly got the worst batches, say, survive? To put it another way let's imagine a hypothetical sports team where the team doctor jabbed all with the same horrible batch on the same day. They now go into a stadium and a wifi kill switch is triggered. I've seen sports stars dropping but I haven't seen that one yet...I hope I don't!