I agree none of the elixirs are safe. I recall many conversations with friends in Thailand, whereby they'd say "but Sinovac seems alright, then I'll be able to travel..." Managed to 'save' a few and talked them out of it.
Friends and I in Bangkok have all noticed a significant spike in ambulances tearing up and down sukhumvit day and night. Anecdotally, friends tell me horror stories of their colleagues & students with ADR such as compressed nerves, can't move their left arm, cancer diagnoses / tumours for young twenty-somethings, the list goes on.
Dr. Luc Montagnier, Nobel Prize winning virologist, said that all the animals in the trials died, and that was enough for me to be convinced two years ago.
20 million may end up being an underestimate, with all the downstream effects. It may end up being in Brother Bugnolo territory.
Nevertheless, life goes on. The perpetrators will get what they deserve.
There are 2 main problems with mRNA-based vaccines -- the lipid nanoparticles and the spike protein. LNPs are clearly toxic (Moderna never got any of their LNPs through animal toxicity trials). The spike protein, in my opinion, is pathogenic on several fronts (clotting, autoimmunity, neurodegenerative, and epigenetic=cancer). Spike protein is a bad target because it changes quickly, hence the ongoing rabbit hole game of boosters for new variants. mRNA-based vaccines also seem to provide fleeting protection in the order of weeks. And with each injection...dose-related illness and death.
The US went with mRNA-based vaccines because NIH holds the patent for stabilized spike protein which causes a "better" antibody response, along with greater chance for adverse effects.
China and Russia likely went with "old technology" because they do not have appropriate infrastructure to make mRNA-based vaccines. These vaccines are also much cheaper to produce and distribute. The may "last longer", but they carry the same risk as other vaccines because the spike protein is itself pathogenic.
Well written and a good point. They are all, pretty much every government, on the pandemic technology ride to the global panopticon, enthusiastically. They think it is the key to their eternal rule and riches.
Oct 13, 2022·edited Oct 13, 2022Liked by Amy Sukwan
It is odd that they all chose the spike protein. Perhaps there is some electrochemical or electomagnetic technology in play that exploits unique or unusual characteristic of the spike protein. The public record of scientific articles on spike protein (s) is huge, yet seems to also contain a large hidden component of unpublished classified papers. One can deduce from the pattern of published papers that there's hidden funding and information on s. Presumably DARPA or BARDA or some other child-agency of DARPA. In that world DARPA scientists typically work on dual-use projects yet only publish papers only in the civilian sector. The most important advances in certain fields are only documented in classified papers that we don't generally have access to.
I'm unaware of any really distinctive & unique characteristic of s that merits this obsession with it in the DARPA clones. Is anyone reading this familiar enough with this scientific literature to know why? E.g. Is s the payload or it a vector for another heretofore unknown payload? Is it just a marketing gimic? E.g. Does s have e-m vibration characteristics suitable for two way data exchange with graphene (hydro)oxide structures? E.g. Perhaps s isn't really important and the real payload is something not yet publicly known. Theories abound.
Second question, and a weird one, for anyone who has read this far: Is anyone aware of a tie-in between spike protein and Two Dimensional Electron Gas (2DEG)? DARPA seems to have a mature (since the mid-1990s) communication protocol that operates via topological solitons (c.f. FQHE) interacting in a 2DEG. 2DEG's occur in nature (e.g. the Earth's magnetopause) and have been built in labs since 1968. Graphene is known to demonstrate 2DEG characteristics at room temperature, including support for the topological form of the Fractional Quantum Hall Effect (FQHE). Might the presence of s, or specific structures therein, provide an e-m resonance useful for data interchange between two communication protocols, specifically between DARPA's 'dancing soliton' protocol and standard spread spectrum RF? [I know this is a highly specialized question and don't seriously expect an answer. On first and second attempts I was unable to perform the correct calculations - it seems a difficult but not intractable Physics problem. ]
Interesting numbers there, the death toll will continue to mount. The Telegraph thinks us so stupid that we'll fall for this: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/10/11/video-games-could-trigger-heart-attacks-children/?s=08
I agree none of the elixirs are safe. I recall many conversations with friends in Thailand, whereby they'd say "but Sinovac seems alright, then I'll be able to travel..." Managed to 'save' a few and talked them out of it.
Friends and I in Bangkok have all noticed a significant spike in ambulances tearing up and down sukhumvit day and night. Anecdotally, friends tell me horror stories of their colleagues & students with ADR such as compressed nerves, can't move their left arm, cancer diagnoses / tumours for young twenty-somethings, the list goes on.
Dr. Luc Montagnier, Nobel Prize winning virologist, said that all the animals in the trials died, and that was enough for me to be convinced two years ago.
20 million may end up being an underestimate, with all the downstream effects. It may end up being in Brother Bugnolo territory.
Nevertheless, life goes on. The perpetrators will get what they deserve.
There are 2 main problems with mRNA-based vaccines -- the lipid nanoparticles and the spike protein. LNPs are clearly toxic (Moderna never got any of their LNPs through animal toxicity trials). The spike protein, in my opinion, is pathogenic on several fronts (clotting, autoimmunity, neurodegenerative, and epigenetic=cancer). Spike protein is a bad target because it changes quickly, hence the ongoing rabbit hole game of boosters for new variants. mRNA-based vaccines also seem to provide fleeting protection in the order of weeks. And with each injection...dose-related illness and death.
The US went with mRNA-based vaccines because NIH holds the patent for stabilized spike protein which causes a "better" antibody response, along with greater chance for adverse effects.
China and Russia likely went with "old technology" because they do not have appropriate infrastructure to make mRNA-based vaccines. These vaccines are also much cheaper to produce and distribute. The may "last longer", but they carry the same risk as other vaccines because the spike protein is itself pathogenic.
"It might choke Artie but it's not going to choke Stymie."
Well written and a good point. They are all, pretty much every government, on the pandemic technology ride to the global panopticon, enthusiastically. They think it is the key to their eternal rule and riches.
It is odd that they all chose the spike protein. Perhaps there is some electrochemical or electomagnetic technology in play that exploits unique or unusual characteristic of the spike protein. The public record of scientific articles on spike protein (s) is huge, yet seems to also contain a large hidden component of unpublished classified papers. One can deduce from the pattern of published papers that there's hidden funding and information on s. Presumably DARPA or BARDA or some other child-agency of DARPA. In that world DARPA scientists typically work on dual-use projects yet only publish papers only in the civilian sector. The most important advances in certain fields are only documented in classified papers that we don't generally have access to.
I'm unaware of any really distinctive & unique characteristic of s that merits this obsession with it in the DARPA clones. Is anyone reading this familiar enough with this scientific literature to know why? E.g. Is s the payload or it a vector for another heretofore unknown payload? Is it just a marketing gimic? E.g. Does s have e-m vibration characteristics suitable for two way data exchange with graphene (hydro)oxide structures? E.g. Perhaps s isn't really important and the real payload is something not yet publicly known. Theories abound.
Second question, and a weird one, for anyone who has read this far: Is anyone aware of a tie-in between spike protein and Two Dimensional Electron Gas (2DEG)? DARPA seems to have a mature (since the mid-1990s) communication protocol that operates via topological solitons (c.f. FQHE) interacting in a 2DEG. 2DEG's occur in nature (e.g. the Earth's magnetopause) and have been built in labs since 1968. Graphene is known to demonstrate 2DEG characteristics at room temperature, including support for the topological form of the Fractional Quantum Hall Effect (FQHE). Might the presence of s, or specific structures therein, provide an e-m resonance useful for data interchange between two communication protocols, specifically between DARPA's 'dancing soliton' protocol and standard spread spectrum RF? [I know this is a highly specialized question and don't seriously expect an answer. On first and second attempts I was unable to perform the correct calculations - it seems a difficult but not intractable Physics problem. ]