Amy that staging and reusing footage is something that SHOULD be a smoking gun that breaks the spell for those remotely on the fence that this was a giant psy op.
It should, but unfortunately most of them refuse to consider anything that does not come from an "approved" source. Offer to show them the Vax Genocide Rumble channel (the content of which nobody can deny) and the response is systematically "but Reuters said Rumble is a conspiracy theory and misinformation website, so no thanks". I have yet to find a way to circumvent this issue.
The truth is that most people don't have the means to break free of their chains, they have to be broken for them.
Right, most people reject any info which makes them uncomfortable. And knowing that the toxxine is dangerous and ineffective, and that they themselves were telling friends and relatives to inject that poison makes them _very_ uncomfortable. So they simply refuse to even consider that bad feeling.
I understand to a degree on all counts. Sometimes a super blue pilled person would post some super mainstream ultimate refutation of conspiracy theorist types of thing: you know, the whole "Vaccines saved 20 million lives" or CDC Study Shows Facemasks work" or "This Study Shows the Increases in Mortality Could not be Due to the Vaccines." depending on how much time I have, sometimes I roll my eyes, recognize this as disinformation and don't even open it. If I have time I take it onbut if I use something my expert said they usually come back with the same "That person was discredited." The only thing that seems to have a little traction is if I work the data myself but they almost always ignore it. I'm sure it is fear on their part: of having that juice circulating in their body, of convincing others to get the juice. For the press there's the loss of status and income and prestige that comes from lying to get people to get the jab...
Exactly! They can literally make up any reason or no reason at all. They can have ChatGPT write the debunking article for them. Nine out of 10 will literally not read past the headline and will dig no deeper. It is just "oh so and so was discredited" or "such and such a story was debunked."
Amy that staging and reusing footage is something that SHOULD be a smoking gun that breaks the spell for those remotely on the fence that this was a giant psy op.
It should, but unfortunately most of them refuse to consider anything that does not come from an "approved" source. Offer to show them the Vax Genocide Rumble channel (the content of which nobody can deny) and the response is systematically "but Reuters said Rumble is a conspiracy theory and misinformation website, so no thanks". I have yet to find a way to circumvent this issue.
The truth is that most people don't have the means to break free of their chains, they have to be broken for them.
Right, most people reject any info which makes them uncomfortable. And knowing that the toxxine is dangerous and ineffective, and that they themselves were telling friends and relatives to inject that poison makes them _very_ uncomfortable. So they simply refuse to even consider that bad feeling.
I understand to a degree on all counts. Sometimes a super blue pilled person would post some super mainstream ultimate refutation of conspiracy theorist types of thing: you know, the whole "Vaccines saved 20 million lives" or CDC Study Shows Facemasks work" or "This Study Shows the Increases in Mortality Could not be Due to the Vaccines." depending on how much time I have, sometimes I roll my eyes, recognize this as disinformation and don't even open it. If I have time I take it onbut if I use something my expert said they usually come back with the same "That person was discredited." The only thing that seems to have a little traction is if I work the data myself but they almost always ignore it. I'm sure it is fear on their part: of having that juice circulating in their body, of convincing others to get the juice. For the press there's the loss of status and income and prestige that comes from lying to get people to get the jab...
I've run across that myself. Whatever you bring up, the answer is frequently "Oh that was debunked."
You ask how it was debunked exactly and get a blank stare and change of subject.
Exactly! They can literally make up any reason or no reason at all. They can have ChatGPT write the debunking article for them. Nine out of 10 will literally not read past the headline and will dig no deeper. It is just "oh so and so was discredited" or "such and such a story was debunked."
So I think what they need is a reason to feel good about themselves for opening their eyes.
What would make them feel good instead of bad? Or even feel angry at having been deceived? That would be an improvement.
The whole problem is psychological, not factual.
I guess they need to know you're on their side and it's not that you personally don't like them.
I have more belief in what I read in public bathrooms than I do in the news.
“Stephanie wuz here!”
Yes, Stephanie, I believe you wuz.
Watch POD PEOPLE BARBECUE. Origin of mask-wearing zombies revealed in song!
https://turfseer.substack.com/p/pod-people-barbecue
Shakespeare meets Vaccine Injury Denial. Listen to Turfseer’s PERCHANCE TO DREAM. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/perchance-to-dream
The people graduate “with honors” from this institution of “higher learning.” Watch SHEEPLE UNIVERSITY. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/sheeple-university
“Country” stands up to Medical Tyranny. Watch Turfseer’s “They Tried to Kill Country (But Country Fought Back).” https://turfseer.substack.com/p/they-tried-to-kill-country-but-country
BONUS: Free Download. THE ALTERNATIVE COVID-19 NARRATIVE HANDBOOK. A Collection of useful links. Get it here: https://turfseer.substack.com/p/the-alternative-covid-narrative-handbook
Subscribe to Turfseer's Newsletter. Songs, music videos and much more.
🎯📎💯…
OK probably for the best.
They didn’t have a stapler emoji either
LOL!
Just let me staple the vicar...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDTjrNrcLvs&ab_channel=madmatymatman
The goats and the deer are smart.
They did what their Messiah asked them to do.
And they survived.
Humans, on the other hand, you show them a better path, and they will shine you off.
And continue on their merry way, and to their detriment.
Critters are way more intelligent. IMHO.