I didn’t watch President Trump’s speech though I read many hot takes on it.
Some are claiming that Trump played a brilliant 5D chess game forcing Democrats to defend the indefensible, time and time again. This appears to be true
Then again both sides seem to be run under the same nefarious anti human agenda while pretending to be in opposition on minor issues that do not bother those in power. This is my cheat sheet:
They’ve moved the Overton window so many times and so quickly that nobody even knows where it is anymore:
Behind the scenes Trump and team’s continued support for jabs, all things Israel, the banning of any opposition to ethnic cleansing in Gaza, the AI in charge of everything subcontext, the Epstein list no show et cetera paints a murkier picture. I think some of this is public ritual humiliation, just as it was in 2020, of forcing people in power to say things which betray their fan base as a signal to who is “really” in charge. I still think Trump was chosen to be at the helm during an economic crisis because the people would better tolerate it under him. I’m watching the money markets movement behind the scenes.
And this is just the relatively few jab deaths that were reported, seeing as how there is no diagnostic code for a vaccine death
Consider the string of logical fallacies put together in this comment (I presume by a mother) and how much constant propaganda it takes to maintain this position: her jabbed kids are always sick, the doctors refuse to test for diseases the vaccines supposedly prevented, then when the child tests positive on PCR for whooping cough, she blames the unvaccinated. Safe and effective!
Then again the education system is not that great…
I think Johnny Cash would approve of this. That’s a good aim!
Know them by their fruits. A few years ago I had a small flock of chickens in Thailand. During the summer of 2022, which is the rainy season here, several of the birds became ill. The older chickens recovered from it but many of the chicks died. It passed within 1-2 months and subsequent hatchlings seemed “immune.”
I have no idea what caused it. Perhaps a passing flock of wild birds gave them bird flu or perhaps they installed a 5G tower nearby as strong EMF is known to cause bird die offs. Perhaps the rainy weather left the chicks with no safe dry areas to sleep at night. Perhaps the chicks saw other chicks dying which caused stress and promoted a die off.
Whatever it might have been blamed on the least scientific response I could have had to it is what is the official policy in many places including the USA. That would be to mass PCR test all of the birds, looking for some preprogrammed genetic fragments of something, and then if it was found mass killing off all of the surviving chickens. Would you not want to study the birds that survived it and were thus “immune”? Wouldn’t these immune chickens make for a healthier more robust flock in the future?
The fruits of this mass culling madness is food shortages. I worry about that with tariffs and the migrant crackdown as well, which perfectly fits with the 2030 agenda. The mass firing of government workers and replacement with AI also fits in with then necessary programmable UBI, all just a cascading market collapse away.
Time will tell.
My headaches have been getting slowly better. Swimming in the Adaman Sea seems to help. I still have no Internet signal myself. Thanks to some generous Substack subscribers and ko-fi donations I was able to buy a second SIM card, which also has …no Internet. But me and my husband have also been able to eat, so thank you.
I’ll post pictures of the construction in the restaurant once I get my phone working. It’s been busy here!
What did you think of Trump’s speech?
We don't often see cartoons as seriously graphic as the NATO on a blood transfusion one. I'm among those who hope, if not formally, that this cartoon represents the reality we'll soon see. I remember as a young person that many cartoons would have this kind of edgy quality where your senses are almost assaulted as the cartoon represents a bitter reality.
You summed up my take: "Behind the scenes Trump and team’s continued support for jabs, all things Israel, the banning of any opposition to ethnic cleansing in Gaza, the AI in charge of everything subcontext, the Epstein list no show et cetera paints a murkier picture." I am also among those extremely happy about any dismantling of this horrible government-censorship apparatus we can affect. I realize illegal immigrants who reside among the criminal element remain top priority for deportation, but I would love to see massive deportations begin with plane loads leaving the U.S. daily. The Darien Gap NGOs need to be shut down asap. Michael Yon indicates some are still operating.
I was delighted to read at ZeroHedge tonight that Rand Paul offered a solution to over-ride Biden-Democratic appointed judges standing in the way of cuts. "Musk Fired-Up About Paul's Rescission Idea For Slashing Spending Up To $500 Billion." I think Musk needs some encouragement.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/musk-said-be-elated-over-pauls-rescission-idea-slashing-budget-500-billion
I value and understand Whitney's stance on pointing toward AI-digital control coming in through a backdoor. However, one scenario I seldomly see either Whitney or Catherine address is abstinence from AI. I don't think people need to be Luddites, but I do think people need to eschew AI usage which I plainly see younger generations are not.
Yes, AI chat bots can give clear and/or good research results. Yet, the dependence and acceptance of AI to determine our background research is what paves the way to ready acceptance of AI in society which then precedes the acceptance of AI in other spheres (law, execution of justice, medical diagnoses, medical prescriptions, medical treatment, insurance questions, etc.) as well as acceptance of digital financial transactions. The mind is already set to accept these modes if people accustom themselves to using AI. Moreover, studies have shown on many occasions how the human mind shuts down when humans begin relying on AI. It's a slippery slope.
Grok evidently, according to one report, now ends their "chat" with people by asking a question which is a human trait indicating interest in the questioner as a person. In fact, this individual reported how caring and concerned AI appeared to be about his physical condition which was a stark contrast to the behavior his medical professionals exhibited toward him. Is AI "caring and concerned" for humans? Of course not. How did AI "learn" these techniques? By humans previously interacting which trained the AI system. Training, as I understand the concept, is aggregating the data by system engineers and constructing algorithms to effect more interaction with humans.
good to hear your improving, Amy.