8 Comments
User's avatar
Toby Rogers's avatar

I think you've figured it out. Wow!

Okay, next question then, how are they going to rig the results that are scheduled to come out in April? Create a new "starting point", after this death (so after Nov. 18), and then call it a new trial, and hope that no one else dies?

Expand full comment
Amy Sukwan's avatar

That's a great question! Will they burn it all trash can fire and start over, or just massage the data they have? I'm going to have to think about it. The more leaks they have to plug the greater the odds of whistleblowers coming forward, so just wholesale fraud make it up as they go type of things might get harder and will certainly get a lot more expensive. On the other side they could just statistically massage the existing trial results, which is safer for them as it provides a fig leaf of integrity/plausible deniability. In either case close scrutiny is not good for them...

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Mar 7, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
KC & the Sunshine's avatar

I’m looking for the studies on RFK’s site now.

Expand full comment
KC & the Sunshine's avatar

Would love a follow up here, if anyone has it, pls.

Expand full comment
jacquelyn sauriol's avatar

What a savage way for a 2 yr old to die. Unspeakably horrid. Straight up poisoning.

Expand full comment
Amy Sukwan's avatar

I couldn't agree more. To sweep it under the rug is despicable

Expand full comment
KW NORTON's avatar

Ghastly - beyond ghastly. They must be stopped.

Expand full comment