8 Comments
Mar 7, 2022·edited Mar 7, 2022Liked by Amy Sukwan

I think you've figured it out. Wow!

Okay, next question then, how are they going to rig the results that are scheduled to come out in April? Create a new "starting point", after this death (so after Nov. 18), and then call it a new trial, and hope that no one else dies?

Expand full comment
author

That's a great question! Will they burn it all trash can fire and start over, or just massage the data they have? I'm going to have to think about it. The more leaks they have to plug the greater the odds of whistleblowers coming forward, so just wholesale fraud make it up as they go type of things might get harder and will certainly get a lot more expensive. On the other side they could just statistically massage the existing trial results, which is safer for them as it provides a fig leaf of integrity/plausible deniability. In either case close scrutiny is not good for them...

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

I’m looking for the studies on RFK’s site now.

Expand full comment

Would love a follow up here, if anyone has it, pls.

Expand full comment

What a savage way for a 2 yr old to die. Unspeakably horrid. Straight up poisoning.

Expand full comment
author

I couldn't agree more. To sweep it under the rug is despicable

Expand full comment

Ghastly - beyond ghastly. They must be stopped.

Expand full comment