Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Benjamin Bartee's avatar

Medical boards are the new inquisition committees. Doctors are the new priests.

Expand full comment
Dr. Flurm Googlybean's avatar

We’re going through this here somewhat — B.C. (Before Covid) we followed the schedule, as its the thing you’re apparently supposed to do. There are the from newborn to toddler regular checkups that usually involve a round of jabs for the kids. Our kids have as far as we know tolerated them fine, never had an immediate reaction. There are then the school entrance milestones where our state enforces some demonstration of having this or that injection. Kindergarten, middle school, high school, coming into a new school involves presenting medical forms.

This year a middle school threshold hit us (https://drflurmgooglybean.substack.com/p/prepping-for-the-school-checkup?r=r6d2x&s=w&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web). I probably need to do a follow up post, though some things are still in flight maybe.

Upshot (puns always intended) is this week we put in a religious exception for the first time. And this is not because we have a scriptural doctrine based prohibition against some of these — indeed we’ve done the full shebang for our oldest and most for the other kids. But it is interesting though in our state there is actually ONLY the religious option (medical too, but that I know is not happening given my kids had most of the sequence already). They infact in documentation seem to imply scrutiny is to prevent any other kind of argument. So we’re trying religious, even though I believe I can make a pretty strong scientific case that in the US most of the shots are likely unnecessary, and risk/benefit is at best a wash.

I think I also learned a bit from my experience trying to do this with my employer, where I laid out a pretty strong ‘informed consent is literally impossible’ case against. FULLY referenced. I was way too specific, and my exception I think therefore remains in some kind of limbo. The few others where I work that essentially put “none of your f’ing business” were approved (doubt that was literally what they put, but some I know could have).

I was tempted to list that we are devout Jedi (something the middle schooler would be completely onboard with, albeit dark side), and that injections interfere with our midichlorian levels, inhibiting religious practice. But I left it vague. Did not even name a religion, just stated although we have had these in the past we find due to sincerely held religious beliefs (that phrase I think important, and lifted direct from American Disabilities Act) we are unable to do them. Less info is more I think. They want to bait you into something they can argue against. We see what happens, like I said still in flight.

All this said, its not unlikely we do later on go ahead with TDaP — but it will take me time to read the literature, look at data and make an actual risk assessment. To first order the form is a shot across the bow that we’re not taking anybody’s word for this ever again. If there is trouble I will be loaded for bear.

Expand full comment
16 more comments...

No posts