Perhaps the most heated debate I’ve seen in the substack space recently, with terrorist events, bridge collapses, threats of impending WWIII, ongoing elevated deaths, continued genocide and general unaccountability, has been over the recent spate of royal and elite deaths and disabilities. Theories have emerged that Kate Middleton, for example, has simply become the new Damar Hamlin or Tiffany Dover: mysteriously disappeared and presumed dead, with some photoshopped pictures or CGI enhanced videos making it appear otherwise. Others adamantly insist that no elite would take the real thing which cannot be named and thus the Priness of Wales is, where exactly? Maybe she took it and died, or has the likely fatal cancer they say she has. Maybe she didn’t take the jabs and died anyways. Regardless of the cause a lot of these people seem to be exiting stage left lately.
This is a possible theory on the Baltimore bridge collapse. In viewing the shocking footage of it, however, I was more taken aback by how quickly it crumpled and fell. It makes me wonder why we don’t see more of this type of thing.
Brownstone institute covered some of the wreckage of this era well. This entire article by Jeffrey Tucker is well worth the read:
“Has the dust settled?
Far from it. It is everywhere. We are choking on it. The storm cloud comes in many forms: inflation, learning losses, ill-health, high crime, non-functioning government services, broken supply chains, shoddy work, displaced workers, substance abuse, mass loneliness, discredited authority, a growing real estate crisis, censored technology, and overweening state power.
For that matter, consider that Easter, the day to celebrate the Son of God’s triumph of life over death, itself was canceled for public worship just four years ago. That actually happened. Not even at the height of World War II was there a consideration of such a thing, or even canceling baseball. When the idea was suggested in a famous movie script, Spencer Tracy asked “Why would you abolish the thing you are trying to preserve?” (Woman of the Year 1942).
Good question. What precisely was the point of the hell we went through? Who did it and why? Why did it last so long? Why has there been no official accounting?
The lack of any real accountability or even so much as an apology is a foreshadowing: they will keep their newfound powers and try it all again.
Meanwhile, the world is on fire with war, mass killings, crime, hunger, and revolution.
All of this traces to lockdowns that began March 2020, the subject about which no one in polite society speaks. It was a painful period, to be sure. The people who did this to us are hoping that we are too traumatized to pursue accountability, much less justice. To the extent we feel that way, we are playing right into their hands.
Even now, there are hundreds and even thousands of questions.
Why were there no widespread seroprevalence tests of the population before locking down? This would have been a great way to measure the level of pre-existing exposure and assess whether Deborah Birx’s stated objective to bring about Zero Covid had any chance of success.
Where did the World Health Organization get the completely bogus 3.4% infection fatality rate number and why did they push it out?
For that matter, why did the lockdown architects not bother with the vast literature already extant, accepted as definitive in the public-health world, that lockdowns achieve only destruction and there was no form of physical intervention that had any hope of stopping a virus destined to spread to the whole population?
We still don’t know:
how they talked Trump into reversing his anti-lockdown stance on or around March 10, 2020;
to what extent the sudden spread of the virus was fueled by testing or even how accurate the tests were;
whether the sudden wave of early death was panic-based or iatrogenic or actually the virus;
how it is that previously obscure agencies gained the power to manage the US workforce and censor media;
who precisely gave the order to lock down US hospital care and why;
how it came to be that the government tried to drive conventional antivirals out of the marketplace;
who had pre-written the thousand-page bills that authorized $2 trillion in spending that broke the budget and unleashed an experiment of universal basic income.
Strangely, much of this can be explained by the crazed ambition to preserve population-wide immunological naivete while waiting for the vaccine to arrive in mid-November eight months later. Was that always the idea, in which case the “15 Days to Flatten Curve” was known to be complete gibberish? If that is actually true, the arrogance and sadism of the policy goal here boggles the mind.
And if that is true, why? Was it to deploy a new platform technology called mRNA that otherwise would obtain no chance for a generalized trial through normal paths? Is that the reason that Anthony Fauci went after the J&J vaccine early on, as a tactic to drive it out of the market and prepare a clean slate for Pfizer and Moderna?
There are many theories, all with plausibility but none with the capacity to explain the whole.
We might say that pharma was behind the whole thing. That seems credible. The goal of testing mRNA on the global population explains a lot, especially given the trumped-up emergency situation. But the very notion that hundreds of governments around the world became surreptitiously captured stretches plausibility.
We might observe that digital tech manipulated policy to give itself a boost. The first big and viral article on the whole lockdown idea was by Thomas “Hammer-and-Dance” Pueyo, a CEO of an online learning hub that became a huge winner. Streaming platforms benefited and so did Amazon as a grocery and goods source, as did Uber Eats and DoorDash and others such as Zoom.
But are we really supposed to believe that human liberties the world over were wrecked to boost profits of this one industry? Again, that’s a stretch. And the same could be said of the theory that media was the driving force. Yes, they won big time, deploying censorship as an industrial tactic against new media startups. But how in the world would they have gained so much power the world over?
Then there is the view that the whole monstrous scheme was concocted to drive Trump out of office by creating chaos and greenlighting mail-in ballots that are difficult if not impossible to check for validity. That seems to check many empirical boxes. No question that there was some major effort to confuse the public as if the presence of the virus was a metaphor for the Trump administration itself that needed to be strangled.
There is surely truth here but how does that account for the hundreds of other governments around the world following the same path? That the response was not just national but global raises real questions.
The (clown) world seems to be on fire lately. Perhaps, however, there’s hope in all of this:
It doesn’t seem to take very long to see through the charade anymore
Going back to the question of whether or not the elites took the Covid vaccine, could they have genuinely believed themselves to be taking something which would greatly extend their lives? It’s possible. Those at the supposed top of the visible pyramid dislike sharing a common humanity with the rest of us:
Moriarity had some interesting musings. My note to my not a virus readers is that I believe that somebody was looking at something and somebody was tinkering with something. I just don’t believe that what is called a virus works in the manner we’ve been taught it does in school.
“I once knew a unique expert in electromagnetism and magnetic resonance (I would say world-leading at this specific usage but that person would disagree), the expertise relied on one singular field. Cellular manipulation and cellular regeneration. That person was so gifted, that they went to teach the people who made the machines how to properly modulate very specific frequencies so they could more efficiently heal clients. One of our main worries was always Spike's persistence (vaccinated and unvaccinated alike).
Frequency is everything. In mathematics, physics, in biology, with the right frequency you can manipulate biological organisms, you can rebuild tissue, or destroy a hard-to-dissolve protein. Here is what nobody knew and it took me years to properly understand. Someone had the foresight of building grooves in the virus, that would pick different types of biological substances that affect how frequencies could potentially affect the viral structure.
This is not a simple feat. You need an absurd level of mathematical knowledge and deep insight into biology and virology to design a structure that is protected from frequency modulation at a molecular level. Add this to the long list of unusual features this virus possesses (all covered in this Substack) and I vehemently believe someone, somehow tinkered with the virus unknown to all parties involved.
If you recall I classified this virus and the Spike Protein as both “The Everything Disease”, and “The Great Accelerator”. AI and Machine Learning tools are great, in fact, they are fantastic and can leap us forward by decades, but two big weaknesses. First, the more capable they are, the more computing power (data centers, hardware) they need), and second, data. They need absurd amounts of data. Data is everything and everything is data. But with the right amount of data, even inefficient architectures can turn dust into gold, from the outside, it may as well look like you are achieving miracles.
So if your plan is to solve longevity, and attempt to achieve immortality, what better way to gather data than a pandemic, with a synthetic virus and vaccine that causes every disease known to science ?”
Could this all represent an attempt to keep the bulk of humanity from evolving to a higher consciousness, something which was perhaps even foretold thousands of years ago by astronomers, say? If you were going to try to prevent the bulk of humanity from doing that (while also keeping any obtained knowledge for yourself), what would you do? Brainstorm with me here!
I’ve noticed recently that every time an elite person dies the official story is considered highly suspect.Some weeks ago I noticed several memes related to the mysterious drowning death of Senate Minority leader Mitch McConnell’s sister in law Angela Chao. Some people believed that the Tesla car she was driving might have been remote controlled into the lake, for example. In a remarkable breath of fresh air in this death a detailed report as covered on Zerohedge was recently provided.
To begin with, does a car like this look easy to get out of if you accidentally drove it into a pond? Especially if you had a blood alcohol concentration of .233, three times the legal limit to drive? So you were basically hammered drunk?
Now I suppose technically Ms. Chao, if she was staying at her private ranch, was not breaking any laws in driving in that condition. It still is a collosally stupid thing to do and only drunk logic could compell her to drive when she apparently had a guest house she could have slept at next door (if you can’t walk you’re better off driving?). So she accidentally put the car in reverse, backed into the pond, then stayed on the phone for a remarkable eight minutes explaining her situation. And said good bye and that she loved everyone as the car filled up with water.
My condolences to Ms. Chao’s family, but the timeline, the details and the multiple witnesses in this case lead me to believe that there was no foul play involved. It sounds like a terrible and tragic accident. It’s also one where the jokes practically write themselves.
Matthew 24:36
No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, but only My Father.
Romans 11:33
33 Oh, the depth of the riches and wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments and how inscrutable his ways! 33 Oh, how great are God's riches and wisdom and knowledge!
It seems to me thaat we are all in uncharted territory…
But perhaps we all are waking up…
I think many elites took it. Even someone like Bob Malone who knew the risks took it. Lots of people with much to lose panicked, especially if they are older. And panic and brainwashing leads to bad decisions. Con men sometimes believe their own con. Dealers can get high on their own supply.
I don't think these people took the jab. Elon says he was injured. In my opinion it is, just tyying to get sympathy. Now that people are really angry. So it's pretend.