Actually, Aneka Lucas does have one child, a daughter, and she was married at least once. I thought she was defensive in that interview because the guy was pressuring her to name names and she could be killed for doing that. Survivors must be very careful about that. She kept trying to turn the interview around to focus on her healing and her program to help other victims to heal.
You would love her memoir: "Quest For Love: Memoir of a Child Sex Slave." She is an amazing example of how humans can recover and forgive and go on to help others.
I joked once that Scorpio is not a sign but a personality disorder 🤣
I think the detriment and fall of planets in western astrology is not a binary thing, but a scale of different values. In the case of the Moon, whose element is Water, she is not as afflicted as Mars in Cancer or Venus in Virgo.
There is also the argument that the Moon is a luminary, not a planet, so she is never in a wrong place.
LOL on the personality disorder! As someone who had relations with five Scorpio men in a row I know those vindictive bastards quite well. My moon sign is in Scorpio and I was told the placement of which reveals the sun sign which is the fatal attraction and I’m a grand water trine Sun in Pisces type to boot. I get the personality but oh the hidden turmoil…
The animal is amazing. They are born ready for war and they seek the dark places to hide from their predators, the birds. Something as simple and harmless as a chicken can destroy a scorpion in a second.
I’m stuck trying to remember if it’s le machine or la machina. My schoolboy French, blue-collar Spanish, and Middle-English Latin keep me confused.
Hasnaa’s observation and the Golden Girls meme remind me of a statement I thought was attributed to Betty White. Maybe not so, but it’s a sweet thought: Charisma is knowing you are charming and so is everyone else. Lately, people who have no interest in being charming depress me. If it's possible to be charming and realistic, you're a good example. I like your balance.
We are being trained in a lot of movies that - when you are being robbed - you must not look at the perpetrator. You must not be able to memorize or recognize any feature that could lead to identifying the perpetrator in the future. If you catch one glimpse, you won’t survive. Simple logic.
How come there are survivors who are 100% capable of identifying their handlers from scenarios far more consequential than a simple street attack?
Movies are not good training for real life. Oddly when I was taking some self defense training I was taught to do the exact opposite of what you said and to memorize every detail and quirk of any hypothetical attacker.
With childhood sexual abuse that usually stretches into multiple very intimate liaisons that can stretch our for days, weeks, months, years and in a few cases even decades I would find it more odd if the victims didn't remember anything about the person who did this. Usually that indicates a repressed memory which they won't allow to surface because it is too painful...
Agree completely with both points. My question is about why such powerful people let those survivors survive. Totally irrational. Then come interviews, books, TV dramas, podcasts, so much career opportunities for the survivor - another irrationality. To appear in the public, one needs to have certain "guts" and skills. To mass transmit the message of abuse, fully knowing that the alleged perpetrator is somewhere out there and can target me again 24/7 - simply absurd and incredible. The questions asked by those interviewing gently avoid such issues and never vet the survivor, probably because "you know, she/he is a victim, do not undermine this role". Again, we are watching these survivors second-hand, in a post-edited material, skillfully crafted to deliver a message of fear and horror. In short, I see these stories as a deeper level of fiction, kind of "War of the worlds" for households, in particular targeting the women audience.
This repressed memory is not a problem for an average psychiatrist, not to mention professionals in the field (detectives, police, researchers). In other words, the survivor will pose maximum threat for the perpetrators for ever. Why do they let them survive? Why one or two select persons over years? How come they are so composed when they relate their experience? Nothing there adds up. But we are keen to believe all this.
After pondering your question of why are some childhood sexual abuse victims allowed to survive the first thing that pops in my mind is what I was talking to about my daughter regarding it last night: you seem to be assuming that there is a unified front with an exact protocol and I doubt that. These people are going to have different kinks which will be deployed in these blackmail rings: some might just be into the Barely Not Legal teenage girl who looks like she's a young woman. Some will get raped and become victims themselves during humiliation rituals. Some will become attached to the victims. Some are gay, some like real young children perhaps in part due to their interest in molding them which in some cases such as what Anneke Lucas is saying with David Rockerfeller, also protects that child. Some are masochists and some are sadists and some will claim to be scientists.
On the darker side some will be snuff film sadists and some will be Satanists. There's organ harvesting rings and things that go down the darkest holes of women who sell their own babies into it and those families that put their own children in the ring. Not all of the victims are going to live, but when you consider the massive scale and scope, not all of them are going to die either. Some might escape, as happened with me. In my case it was thankfully so early that I have no names to name and just a lot of speculation regarding whether the plan was Satanic ritual or just an organized trafficking ring. The only thing I'm sure of is that it was organized.
Not all of these survivors are striking big book and speaking deals: I am always aware of how relatively few come forward considering the global scale of these operations: virtually all of the rich, famous and powerful are in one way or another drawn in. It takes an incredible amount of spiritual fortitude to heal from such a thing, but it does and can, by the Grace of God, happen...
You’ve gone into it far deeper than I thought. My thinking stopped at the question of the threat posed by publicly speaking persons who (considering their knowledge) should be silent for ever. The three key whistleblowers of the recent 20 years are out there, “free”, but they have never been allowed into the public lens. No interviews, no books, no podcasts - even though these productions would probably dwarf the most grossing Hollywood sources of proceeds. In this view, these public voices appear to me to be incredible, staged or scripted from line one. I don’t know anything about it first-hand, so that’s only speculation.
The second thing is “why”. Why would a journalist be allowed to spend time and money on a matter that will not be allowed to run along? It doesn’t make sense. Crop circles or Egyptian pyramids are given more attention and screen time, repeatedly. Business-wise, a bad idea, waste of air time on a hit-level material and stopping it in the bud.
Those who speak out are not accidental survivors of accidental, one-off situations. They paint the complete landscape of a large scheme. No interest on part of other (competitive) journalists and media companies - in a subject that is a goldmine of attention and cashflow in itself - may suggest sort of copyright lock on the story and its slow leaking out to the public, simply to make it appear true.
These are my subjective outsider’s views. The public is so keen to call tons of conspiracy theories everywhere, except this one we believe no questions asked. Strange.
As you see, I’m not into whether these particular stories are true or not. I have no way to check it, which is why I take them as modern “Wars of the Worlds”.
Actually, Aneka Lucas does have one child, a daughter, and she was married at least once. I thought she was defensive in that interview because the guy was pressuring her to name names and she could be killed for doing that. Survivors must be very careful about that. She kept trying to turn the interview around to focus on her healing and her program to help other victims to heal.
You would love her memoir: "Quest For Love: Memoir of a Child Sex Slave." She is an amazing example of how humans can recover and forgive and go on to help others.
I am considering buying that memoir…thnks for the correction!
https://rumble.com/v555bar-e104-memoirs-of-a-child-sex-slave-quest-for-love-featuring-anneke-lucas.html
Here's an interview. Trauma trigger warning.
Midweek memes take the hump out of Hump day Wednesday's
Nice!
thank you
thank you
I looked into Kate Perry's birth chart. She's a triple Scorpio. That means, Sun+Moon+Ascendant in Scorpio.
Another way of saying this is that she was born at sunrise during the new moon. Well, to be more precise, the day after new moon.
She's truly a Martian.
Triple Scorpio explains Katie Perry's intensity. Supposedly the moon is in detriment in Scorpio as that rules over emotions...
I joked once that Scorpio is not a sign but a personality disorder 🤣
I think the detriment and fall of planets in western astrology is not a binary thing, but a scale of different values. In the case of the Moon, whose element is Water, she is not as afflicted as Mars in Cancer or Venus in Virgo.
There is also the argument that the Moon is a luminary, not a planet, so she is never in a wrong place.
LOL on the personality disorder! As someone who had relations with five Scorpio men in a row I know those vindictive bastards quite well. My moon sign is in Scorpio and I was told the placement of which reveals the sun sign which is the fatal attraction and I’m a grand water trine Sun in Pisces type to boot. I get the personality but oh the hidden turmoil…
The animal is amazing. They are born ready for war and they seek the dark places to hide from their predators, the birds. Something as simple and harmless as a chicken can destroy a scorpion in a second.
Sad to hear this about SRF.
I’m stuck trying to remember if it’s le machine or la machina. My schoolboy French, blue-collar Spanish, and Middle-English Latin keep me confused.
Hasnaa’s observation and the Golden Girls meme remind me of a statement I thought was attributed to Betty White. Maybe not so, but it’s a sweet thought: Charisma is knowing you are charming and so is everyone else. Lately, people who have no interest in being charming depress me. If it's possible to be charming and realistic, you're a good example. I like your balance.
We are being trained in a lot of movies that - when you are being robbed - you must not look at the perpetrator. You must not be able to memorize or recognize any feature that could lead to identifying the perpetrator in the future. If you catch one glimpse, you won’t survive. Simple logic.
How come there are survivors who are 100% capable of identifying their handlers from scenarios far more consequential than a simple street attack?
Movies are not good training for real life. Oddly when I was taking some self defense training I was taught to do the exact opposite of what you said and to memorize every detail and quirk of any hypothetical attacker.
With childhood sexual abuse that usually stretches into multiple very intimate liaisons that can stretch our for days, weeks, months, years and in a few cases even decades I would find it more odd if the victims didn't remember anything about the person who did this. Usually that indicates a repressed memory which they won't allow to surface because it is too painful...
Agree completely with both points. My question is about why such powerful people let those survivors survive. Totally irrational. Then come interviews, books, TV dramas, podcasts, so much career opportunities for the survivor - another irrationality. To appear in the public, one needs to have certain "guts" and skills. To mass transmit the message of abuse, fully knowing that the alleged perpetrator is somewhere out there and can target me again 24/7 - simply absurd and incredible. The questions asked by those interviewing gently avoid such issues and never vet the survivor, probably because "you know, she/he is a victim, do not undermine this role". Again, we are watching these survivors second-hand, in a post-edited material, skillfully crafted to deliver a message of fear and horror. In short, I see these stories as a deeper level of fiction, kind of "War of the worlds" for households, in particular targeting the women audience.
This repressed memory is not a problem for an average psychiatrist, not to mention professionals in the field (detectives, police, researchers). In other words, the survivor will pose maximum threat for the perpetrators for ever. Why do they let them survive? Why one or two select persons over years? How come they are so composed when they relate their experience? Nothing there adds up. But we are keen to believe all this.
After pondering your question of why are some childhood sexual abuse victims allowed to survive the first thing that pops in my mind is what I was talking to about my daughter regarding it last night: you seem to be assuming that there is a unified front with an exact protocol and I doubt that. These people are going to have different kinks which will be deployed in these blackmail rings: some might just be into the Barely Not Legal teenage girl who looks like she's a young woman. Some will get raped and become victims themselves during humiliation rituals. Some will become attached to the victims. Some are gay, some like real young children perhaps in part due to their interest in molding them which in some cases such as what Anneke Lucas is saying with David Rockerfeller, also protects that child. Some are masochists and some are sadists and some will claim to be scientists.
On the darker side some will be snuff film sadists and some will be Satanists. There's organ harvesting rings and things that go down the darkest holes of women who sell their own babies into it and those families that put their own children in the ring. Not all of the victims are going to live, but when you consider the massive scale and scope, not all of them are going to die either. Some might escape, as happened with me. In my case it was thankfully so early that I have no names to name and just a lot of speculation regarding whether the plan was Satanic ritual or just an organized trafficking ring. The only thing I'm sure of is that it was organized.
Not all of these survivors are striking big book and speaking deals: I am always aware of how relatively few come forward considering the global scale of these operations: virtually all of the rich, famous and powerful are in one way or another drawn in. It takes an incredible amount of spiritual fortitude to heal from such a thing, but it does and can, by the Grace of God, happen...
You’ve gone into it far deeper than I thought. My thinking stopped at the question of the threat posed by publicly speaking persons who (considering their knowledge) should be silent for ever. The three key whistleblowers of the recent 20 years are out there, “free”, but they have never been allowed into the public lens. No interviews, no books, no podcasts - even though these productions would probably dwarf the most grossing Hollywood sources of proceeds. In this view, these public voices appear to me to be incredible, staged or scripted from line one. I don’t know anything about it first-hand, so that’s only speculation.
The second thing is “why”. Why would a journalist be allowed to spend time and money on a matter that will not be allowed to run along? It doesn’t make sense. Crop circles or Egyptian pyramids are given more attention and screen time, repeatedly. Business-wise, a bad idea, waste of air time on a hit-level material and stopping it in the bud.
Those who speak out are not accidental survivors of accidental, one-off situations. They paint the complete landscape of a large scheme. No interest on part of other (competitive) journalists and media companies - in a subject that is a goldmine of attention and cashflow in itself - may suggest sort of copyright lock on the story and its slow leaking out to the public, simply to make it appear true.
These are my subjective outsider’s views. The public is so keen to call tons of conspiracy theories everywhere, except this one we believe no questions asked. Strange.
As you see, I’m not into whether these particular stories are true or not. I have no way to check it, which is why I take them as modern “Wars of the Worlds”.
This comment is so deep I need to sleep on it and then some. Stand bye…
To the credit of that inflation meme at least the house got bigger too.
Yeah, but the 1975 appliances literally still work just fine, but you'll need to replace the present day ones in about five years.
https://substack.com/@atrahim/note/c-135377774