One side of the ship is tipping rapidly and starting to dump people into frigid waters and the other side of the ship is staring out the deck of the other side crying, "Safe and effective! Get boosted!"
That was a mixed metaphor. I do mixed metaphors sometimes.
There is a bizarre subset of true believers who say the stupidest things sometimes. They talk about getting maybe a fifth booster because apparently they got Covid-19 again, they blame the facemask free for their latest bout with the coof, and they don't have the slightest introspection about it. Those true believers seem to be declining in numbers slowly but surely. I suppose we can write "it would have been so much worse without the jabs" on their tombstones...
Blaming the non compliant is an extension of their world view that their health is subject to outside forces and they depend on other outside forces to protect them from threats with quackcination. It is a strange form of protection as it has a weakness when not everyone partakes and if the first few rounds of quackcines don't work, keep going as it's all we've got. This is a poisoned world view which leads them to accept poison as a solution to their supposed threats on their health. It leads them deeper and deeper into an abyss.
They've all become victims incapable of taking responsibility. But I sometimes wonder how quickly they could turn on a dime from being victims of a scary virus to being victims of big pharma...
Believing in a scary virus leads into being a victim of big pHARMa. It's within the same context of a poisoned world view. Or did you mean something else?
The fear of contagion, the fear of not being protected and the desire to compel others to accept their poisoned world view or at least force action upon them (as in quackcination) seems to surpass all other concerns.
As we see the world today, a poisoned world view that is challenging to deal with as it does not respond to logic, math or common sense. It is like telling a child not to touch a hot stove, they don't get it and are compelled to do so. It is a matter of maturing through experience and who knows when that will take place.
What comes to mind for me is a misplaced trust in pHARMa for immune system support, the corollary of which is lack of trust in the body, an overblown fear of nature (i.e. microbes) and a lack of rational inquiry into the story we have been told. If this is a viral pandemic, why do the numbers instead tell us it is not viral, but rather a rise in chronic illness, compounded by quackcination?
I think so as well. I had heard that Phizer had recently done a SEC filing that might affect their existance as a company, possibly in prep for their dissolution, so they can disappear....it was a Dr Robert Malone posting awhile back...
I read about that one too. It's a double edged sword corporations being treated as human: it means the entity Pfizer is suable and liable for fraud. But if it's just this multi shell Borg where you have to go after individuals it's a lot tougher...
It's sad. The 5 year chart still has Pfizer close to all time highs. Then again they can manipulate those prices anyways they want to, so they might be beating down short sellers...
They have enough cash flow, some could be used to support the stock to keep the optics in place. If the market were to turn on them though, with 5B shares outstanding, maybe Bill or George would have to step in to help, otherwise it could crash hard.
I would ask (the universe) how it can possibly be right to treat them as people when they have no moral compass except to create profit? And also, how can they be of one mind, if they are a person they are a person with multiple personalities, which is not usually a good thing as I have experienced. I really know little about it or why it happened they were declared such.
Be very careful about those things. I saw one a while back about prepping for Pfizer dissolution, posted by several people including Jessica Rose. Then I came across a comment by somebody with expertise in SEC filings who showed that it was a Nothing Burger.
The other day Mathew Crawford, who has worked on Wall Street, argued convincingly that following Edward Dowd's lead regarding investing could be disastrous. No way can I do his column justice, but the pithy take-home message is that the market can stay irrational a lot longer than you can stay solvent.
You are in my wheelhouse on this. I used to run weekly market analysis for financialwire along with a year review. I was correct in my predictions about 60-65% of the time. I did it by looking for herd trends in a given week and Consistently running against it. I figured it was more like a Vegas table where they want all the chips down to clear them out. They've got all the money in the world why not manipulate it? Only in 2009 did I hear real cracks...though I am hearing them again
re your comment ' I did it by looking for herd trends in a given week and Consistently running against it. ' golden advice, only dead fish go with the flow....best
Charles- luckily for me I have nothing to invest in any market, and if I did I wouldn't anyway. I would invest it directly in people, carefully. Dowd didn't give much if any investment advice anyway, my takaway from listening to him multiple times is that he is just trying to help expose the sham primarily. It does make sense that Phizeer would try to disappear, with some others, will bet you a $1. It would be something to try to see who IS investing in caskets, which is a gruesome idea but probably lucrative like many gruesome ideas. I would invest in a mushroom casket company, perhaps, because I would like to try and biodegrade properly. One issue I heard yesterday re deaths is that even dead bodies are still emmitting electronic addresses, which is why the cabal wants all the 'covid (whackscene) dead' to be cremated. Now, when that happens, the smoke out the chimney can probs go on to further infect us with nanos...and on it goes...I guess the only real answer is to start pulling down the 5g towers, 'Georgia guidestone' style. Best
16? I'm jealous! I have 2 one of whom wants to talk on WhatsApp about all the kinky things she can do because she's in Thailand too. She either didn't notice or doesn't care that I'm a female. ;) Hi friend!
Whomever is in charge in Uruguay had best avoid small planes, small bodies of water and food that has not been tested. Things didn't end well for others who defied Pfizer.
I believe that this is a potential Achille's heel. It needs to be attacked, relentlessly.
Make the defenders of the "safe and effective" narrative -- be they genius epidemiologists or moronic politicians -- defend not the "safe and effective" narrative but Pfizer's extensive efforts to keep all this stuff hidden.
I say this almost daily, and have followed up to some extent. If we all post the myriad of of, “Oops! That wasn’t as safe & effective as we supposed. Recall!”, post all the recalls and all the lawsuits against ALL pHARMa it may eventually crumble the complete & utter pedestal of confidence and trust upon which the masses have placed Big pHARMa. The 5 BILLION dollar VIOXX debacle always springs to mind. Start there.
One side of the ship is tipping rapidly and starting to dump people into frigid waters and the other side of the ship is staring out the deck of the other side crying, "Safe and effective! Get boosted!"
That was a mixed metaphor. I do mixed metaphors sometimes.
There is a bizarre subset of true believers who say the stupidest things sometimes. They talk about getting maybe a fifth booster because apparently they got Covid-19 again, they blame the facemask free for their latest bout with the coof, and they don't have the slightest introspection about it. Those true believers seem to be declining in numbers slowly but surely. I suppose we can write "it would have been so much worse without the jabs" on their tombstones...
Blaming the non compliant is an extension of their world view that their health is subject to outside forces and they depend on other outside forces to protect them from threats with quackcination. It is a strange form of protection as it has a weakness when not everyone partakes and if the first few rounds of quackcines don't work, keep going as it's all we've got. This is a poisoned world view which leads them to accept poison as a solution to their supposed threats on their health. It leads them deeper and deeper into an abyss.
They've all become victims incapable of taking responsibility. But I sometimes wonder how quickly they could turn on a dime from being victims of a scary virus to being victims of big pharma...
Believing in a scary virus leads into being a victim of big pHARMa. It's within the same context of a poisoned world view. Or did you mean something else?
I agree but what I mean is will any of these true believers ever do a dollars and cents calculation of what they've lost?
The fear of contagion, the fear of not being protected and the desire to compel others to accept their poisoned world view or at least force action upon them (as in quackcination) seems to surpass all other concerns.
As we see the world today, a poisoned world view that is challenging to deal with as it does not respond to logic, math or common sense. It is like telling a child not to touch a hot stove, they don't get it and are compelled to do so. It is a matter of maturing through experience and who knows when that will take place.
The Darwin awards come to mind.
What comes to mind for me is a misplaced trust in pHARMa for immune system support, the corollary of which is lack of trust in the body, an overblown fear of nature (i.e. microbes) and a lack of rational inquiry into the story we have been told. If this is a viral pandemic, why do the numbers instead tell us it is not viral, but rather a rise in chronic illness, compounded by quackcination?
You need someone like a Salvadore Dali to paint that 2 sided ship...
turner https://sites.google.com/site/adairarthistory/_/rsrc/1491312192298/iv-later-europe-and-americas/111-slave-ship-slavers-throwing-overboard-the-dead-and-dying-typhoon-coming-on-joseph-mallord-william-turner/Turner-Slave-Ship-e1304457227658.jpg
I think so as well. I had heard that Phizer had recently done a SEC filing that might affect their existance as a company, possibly in prep for their dissolution, so they can disappear....it was a Dr Robert Malone posting awhile back...
I read about that one too. It's a double edged sword corporations being treated as human: it means the entity Pfizer is suable and liable for fraud. But if it's just this multi shell Borg where you have to go after individuals it's a lot tougher...
How is Pfizer stock still in the $50s? (6 July 2022)
I don't get it.
It's sad. The 5 year chart still has Pfizer close to all time highs. Then again they can manipulate those prices anyways they want to, so they might be beating down short sellers...
They have enough cash flow, some could be used to support the stock to keep the optics in place. If the market were to turn on them though, with 5B shares outstanding, maybe Bill or George would have to step in to help, otherwise it could crash hard.
They keep signing deals for new quackcination formulations. Last I read the new formulation is based on Omicron (moronic).
The US government shoveled another $3 billion at them recently. It looks like a Ukraine style money laundering operation.
I thought declaring corporations as people made it harder to sue them. Wasnt that during Reagans presidency?
I know Citizens United allowed Corps to fund political campaigns as private donors. I think corporate liability gets double edged if fraud is proven
i am just looking at this
https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2019/01/30/corporations-are-people-too-and-they-should-act-like-it/
I would ask (the universe) how it can possibly be right to treat them as people when they have no moral compass except to create profit? And also, how can they be of one mind, if they are a person they are a person with multiple personalities, which is not usually a good thing as I have experienced. I really know little about it or why it happened they were declared such.
Be very careful about those things. I saw one a while back about prepping for Pfizer dissolution, posted by several people including Jessica Rose. Then I came across a comment by somebody with expertise in SEC filings who showed that it was a Nothing Burger.
The other day Mathew Crawford, who has worked on Wall Street, argued convincingly that following Edward Dowd's lead regarding investing could be disastrous. No way can I do his column justice, but the pithy take-home message is that the market can stay irrational a lot longer than you can stay solvent.
You are in my wheelhouse on this. I used to run weekly market analysis for financialwire along with a year review. I was correct in my predictions about 60-65% of the time. I did it by looking for herd trends in a given week and Consistently running against it. I figured it was more like a Vegas table where they want all the chips down to clear them out. They've got all the money in the world why not manipulate it? Only in 2009 did I hear real cracks...though I am hearing them again
re your comment ' I did it by looking for herd trends in a given week and Consistently running against it. ' golden advice, only dead fish go with the flow....best
Charles- luckily for me I have nothing to invest in any market, and if I did I wouldn't anyway. I would invest it directly in people, carefully. Dowd didn't give much if any investment advice anyway, my takaway from listening to him multiple times is that he is just trying to help expose the sham primarily. It does make sense that Phizeer would try to disappear, with some others, will bet you a $1. It would be something to try to see who IS investing in caskets, which is a gruesome idea but probably lucrative like many gruesome ideas. I would invest in a mushroom casket company, perhaps, because I would like to try and biodegrade properly. One issue I heard yesterday re deaths is that even dead bodies are still emmitting electronic addresses, which is why the cabal wants all the 'covid (whackscene) dead' to be cremated. Now, when that happens, the smoke out the chimney can probs go on to further infect us with nanos...and on it goes...I guess the only real answer is to start pulling down the 5g towers, 'Georgia guidestone' style. Best
ps i heard the dead bodies emmitting nanos here -this is part 2 of a recent chat, mindblowing what we are up against....https://rumble.com/v1b6p2b-dr.-astrid-stuckelberger-who-pandemic-treaty-important-update-part-2.html
https://www.hashtags.org/analytics/Pfizer/
May be better plots, but this is what I’ve been using. ~1/2 Hz.
Surprised they didn’t try the 75 years trick.
Thanks for that. I've never really analyzed hashtags I'm pretty new to twitter in the sense that I have no followers and don't really care...
Same here — signed up to watch the Elon show. I’m up to 16 followers now! Lost my CCP spy follower with a Taiwan tweet I think though.
16? I'm jealous! I have 2 one of whom wants to talk on WhatsApp about all the kinky things she can do because she's in Thailand too. She either didn't notice or doesn't care that I'm a female. ;) Hi friend!
OK there — add one more! At least until I succeed in my quest to make Twitter ban me.
Whomever is in charge in Uruguay had best avoid small planes, small bodies of water and food that has not been tested. Things didn't end well for others who defied Pfizer.
I believe that this is a potential Achille's heel. It needs to be attacked, relentlessly.
Make the defenders of the "safe and effective" narrative -- be they genius epidemiologists or moronic politicians -- defend not the "safe and effective" narrative but Pfizer's extensive efforts to keep all this stuff hidden.
Nobody wants to defend that.
Shift the paradigm.
I say this almost daily, and have followed up to some extent. If we all post the myriad of of, “Oops! That wasn’t as safe & effective as we supposed. Recall!”, post all the recalls and all the lawsuits against ALL pHARMa it may eventually crumble the complete & utter pedestal of confidence and trust upon which the masses have placed Big pHARMa. The 5 BILLION dollar VIOXX debacle always springs to mind. Start there.
Yet our own country doesn't ask such question on behalf of the people.