Interesting dialogue regarding the Aschen depopulation plan very thought provoking. I'm not a television watcher so I never heard of it that way...but predictive programming is a huge thing for better and worse...
What about other quackcines and their effect on fertility? Has anyone looked into that? I also think that the accelerating incidence of autism will also have an effect on birth rates.
On the other side of this topic is the life insurance and funeral homes. Should be hearing from them in the next few days. With quackcine hesitancy increasing, will Q1 be a high point? Will deaths continue to rise or fall back to baseline?
From the SCI International (funeral services) call:
"I would tell you that so far, we're continuing to see, unfortunately, excess deaths. There's no doubt about it. We're still 17% above the first quarter of 2020, which tells us something’s going on in the market."
They have noticed an uptick, but nothing earth shattering. No mention of the quackcines.
"The short answer is deaths are occurring for a lot of different reasons, lack of access to medical care, screenings. We're seeing every statistic you possibly could that's driving this."
This week I've been on a ton in the healthcare space in some way: AmerisourceBergen (they distribute vaccines and therapeutics-- I could make a few comments there), Penumbra (all about the blood clots and strokes, and curiously the first time it's been tier 1 call), Ceridian (not a ton they said that I recall) and Tandem Diabetes, which was all about the staff shortage and difficulties but rocked their call anyways. Let's just say none mentioned the V word.
So far the hysteria over the alleged virus and the deaths it would cause was akin to the preachers of the coming armageddon. Then the quackcine doomsayers predicted the shot would depopulate the world. So far, both have missed the mark. With increasing quackcine hesitancy, the quackcine as method of depopulation is in question.
Will be interesting to see how many will take the next flu shot.
It may boomerang back into a better world, one in which trust in the "authorities" is not a given. Perhaps a place that uses real data to build a better world. I'd say it's too early to tell.
"Just 34% of Iowa adults now say all children should be required to receive standard shots unless they have a doctor-signed statement showing they have a medical reason not to be vaccinated, the poll shows. That’s down from 59% who supported such a requirement in 2015, when the Iowa Poll asked a similar question about childhood vaccinations."
My guess is that the Schwabby types are trying to lower fertility rates primarily by extending menstrual cycles, preventing cycles, increasing spontaneous abortions and causing premature ovarian failure. If cycles are extended by 3 days in half of the child bearing women, that's about a 5% drop in fertility alone.
The premature ovarian failure is a possible side effect for some offspring of the jabbed as noted by a Moderna worker.
I would consider myself a "true" feminist. I sometimes think the most destructive thing feminists did beginning in the 1980's was focusing on how women could be just as good at "male" ventures like making money, risk taking, fighting et cetera while minimizing and downplaying the true feminine mystique that derives from being closer to the source of life (including but not at all limited to motherhood). And now we live in a clown world where men can apparently be better women and we're denoted as people with a uterus or something...not insulting at all!
Wow. This doesn't surprise me at all, sadly. I haven't been keeping up with the recent data, but I read something similar about Finland recently.
Here was the state of the knowledge a couple of months ago. I suppose I need to update this at some point:
https://themariachiyears.substack.com/p/covid-vaccines-as-the-aschen-agenda?s=w
Interesting dialogue regarding the Aschen depopulation plan very thought provoking. I'm not a television watcher so I never heard of it that way...but predictive programming is a huge thing for better and worse...
What about other quackcines and their effect on fertility? Has anyone looked into that? I also think that the accelerating incidence of autism will also have an effect on birth rates.
I don't think any are good for pregnancy and most prior can do cumulative damage, but I suspect this one has clear anti fertility mechanisms
On the other side of this topic is the life insurance and funeral homes. Should be hearing from them in the next few days. With quackcine hesitancy increasing, will Q1 be a high point? Will deaths continue to rise or fall back to baseline?
I'm very curious on that too!
From the SCI International (funeral services) call:
"I would tell you that so far, we're continuing to see, unfortunately, excess deaths. There's no doubt about it. We're still 17% above the first quarter of 2020, which tells us something’s going on in the market."
They have noticed an uptick, but nothing earth shattering. No mention of the quackcines.
"The short answer is deaths are occurring for a lot of different reasons, lack of access to medical care, screenings. We're seeing every statistic you possibly could that's driving this."
This week I've been on a ton in the healthcare space in some way: AmerisourceBergen (they distribute vaccines and therapeutics-- I could make a few comments there), Penumbra (all about the blood clots and strokes, and curiously the first time it's been tier 1 call), Ceridian (not a ton they said that I recall) and Tandem Diabetes, which was all about the staff shortage and difficulties but rocked their call anyways. Let's just say none mentioned the V word.
So far the hysteria over the alleged virus and the deaths it would cause was akin to the preachers of the coming armageddon. Then the quackcine doomsayers predicted the shot would depopulate the world. So far, both have missed the mark. With increasing quackcine hesitancy, the quackcine as method of depopulation is in question.
Will be interesting to see how many will take the next flu shot.
It may boomerang back into a better world, one in which trust in the "authorities" is not a given. Perhaps a place that uses real data to build a better world. I'd say it's too early to tell.
It's already happening.
"Just 34% of Iowa adults now say all children should be required to receive standard shots unless they have a doctor-signed statement showing they have a medical reason not to be vaccinated, the poll shows. That’s down from 59% who supported such a requirement in 2015, when the Iowa Poll asked a similar question about childhood vaccinations."
https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/politics/iowa-poll/2022/03/13/iowa-school-mandatory-vaccine-requirements-non-covid-support-drops-poll/9442227002/
Yes, on the optimistic side, the hole they are digging with the current quackcine may be enough to bury them all. At the very least if:
1. the quackcines are optional
2. the quackcines are held to the same testing and regulatory standards as other drugs
3. the quackcine manufactures are liable for injury and death
I would call that a win.
My guess is that the Schwabby types are trying to lower fertility rates primarily by extending menstrual cycles, preventing cycles, increasing spontaneous abortions and causing premature ovarian failure. If cycles are extended by 3 days in half of the child bearing women, that's about a 5% drop in fertility alone.
The premature ovarian failure is a possible side effect for some offspring of the jabbed as noted by a Moderna worker.
"Schwabby types". I love this place. :)
Great, great work, Amy.
Horrifying. This topic has Naomi Wolf shrieking like a banshee, as it should ALL true feminists.
I would consider myself a "true" feminist. I sometimes think the most destructive thing feminists did beginning in the 1980's was focusing on how women could be just as good at "male" ventures like making money, risk taking, fighting et cetera while minimizing and downplaying the true feminine mystique that derives from being closer to the source of life (including but not at all limited to motherhood). And now we live in a clown world where men can apparently be better women and we're denoted as people with a uterus or something...not insulting at all!