I think the FDA is a wholly corrupt entity and for them to even make this lukewarm half measures statement is a pretty good indication that the data is overwhelming.
They paused if for a year per the medpage link.
"Use of Johnson and Johnson's (J&J) COVID-19 vaccine should only be limited to certain adults, the FDA said on Thursday.
Due to an updated analysis of the rare cases of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS), which typically occur 1 to 2 weeks after vaccination, use of the J&J vaccine should be restricted to those for whom mRNA vaccines are "not accessible or clinically appropriate," or who would not get vaccinated if not for the J&J vaccine, the agency said."
Let's remember that the period within 1 to 2 weeks post "vaccination" has been dumped into the "unvaccinated" pile in the public health record keeping needed to continue the narrative of pandemic of the unvaccinated.
Even the best that they can finesse it, they see that this deal is going to come unraveled.
I agree. The J&J shot was suspended a year ago but for only 15 days at the time. I think they had to keep it on the table as a more attractive option to those facing mandates who did not want to take anything. Now that operation is done. The classification of recently jabbed as anti-vaxxers was really sinister and evil: it hid a lot of jab injuries and blamed the antivax people for hospitalization numbers in one fell swoop.
As if the Murderna and the Pfizer euthanizer jabs caused no injuries and death. Pure fantasy. J&J went to market for two reasons: to be the whipping boy and to make the FDA appear to be focused on safety. J&J got out of the gate late, had much lower published efficacy rates, got temporarily suspended by the FDA, never got an EUA for kids and J&J jab recipients got treated like the dreaded unjabbed in some countries. And the whole time, the FDA knew the 'one and done' would never be enough.
Now it looks like J&J is having a hard time pawning off their excess jabs to the folks in poor countries. So the FDA decides to collect a few more safety gold stars and issue a meaningless restriction on their favorite pharma stooge. But never mind all that, we've got Novavax warming up in the bullpen....it could be the next whipping boy.
I agree there too. These tiny numbers of adverse reactions are supposed to make the FDA look good, like out of an abundance of caution we suspended a a shot with a 1 in 2 million chance of death look how safety focussed we are. Oddly my writing of Collage of Compliance Part 4: Tales From Thailand has been put on a little hold for a funeral. Off to Wat Muang Mai. I don't know if this friend was jabbed but I might ask his brother Ron
I think the FDA is a wholly corrupt entity and for them to even make this lukewarm half measures statement is a pretty good indication that the data is overwhelming.
They paused if for a year per the medpage link.
"Use of Johnson and Johnson's (J&J) COVID-19 vaccine should only be limited to certain adults, the FDA said on Thursday.
Due to an updated analysis of the rare cases of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS), which typically occur 1 to 2 weeks after vaccination, use of the J&J vaccine should be restricted to those for whom mRNA vaccines are "not accessible or clinically appropriate," or who would not get vaccinated if not for the J&J vaccine, the agency said."
Let's remember that the period within 1 to 2 weeks post "vaccination" has been dumped into the "unvaccinated" pile in the public health record keeping needed to continue the narrative of pandemic of the unvaccinated.
Even the best that they can finesse it, they see that this deal is going to come unraveled.
I agree. The J&J shot was suspended a year ago but for only 15 days at the time. I think they had to keep it on the table as a more attractive option to those facing mandates who did not want to take anything. Now that operation is done. The classification of recently jabbed as anti-vaxxers was really sinister and evil: it hid a lot of jab injuries and blamed the antivax people for hospitalization numbers in one fell swoop.
Isn’t this the one Alex Berenson said he’d take? 😂
As if the Murderna and the Pfizer euthanizer jabs caused no injuries and death. Pure fantasy. J&J went to market for two reasons: to be the whipping boy and to make the FDA appear to be focused on safety. J&J got out of the gate late, had much lower published efficacy rates, got temporarily suspended by the FDA, never got an EUA for kids and J&J jab recipients got treated like the dreaded unjabbed in some countries. And the whole time, the FDA knew the 'one and done' would never be enough.
Now it looks like J&J is having a hard time pawning off their excess jabs to the folks in poor countries. So the FDA decides to collect a few more safety gold stars and issue a meaningless restriction on their favorite pharma stooge. But never mind all that, we've got Novavax warming up in the bullpen....it could be the next whipping boy.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/johnson-johnson-suspends-sales-forecast-102842696.html
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/04/29/fda-panel-to-discuss-novavax-covid-vaccine-pfizer-and-moderna-kids-shots-in-june.html
I agree there too. These tiny numbers of adverse reactions are supposed to make the FDA look good, like out of an abundance of caution we suspended a a shot with a 1 in 2 million chance of death look how safety focussed we are. Oddly my writing of Collage of Compliance Part 4: Tales From Thailand has been put on a little hold for a funeral. Off to Wat Muang Mai. I don't know if this friend was jabbed but I might ask his brother Ron
Aww I'm sorry to hear that. Hope it wasn't the jab roulette.