I think pride because these eugenic globalists think they are the only ones worth while to live in comfort or at all. Remember that it was Pride that brought about the fall of Lucifer!
It could also be about stressing something to the breaking point. Allopathic medicine has clearly overpromised and underdelivered in terms of treating chronic health issues. The more spectacularly it fails, the more obvious it becomes it is not an effective path for humanity to follow. The recognition that we can do better in the external environment now has to shift to the internal environment, i.e. the terrain model of health and disease.
"The problem was may many people in positions of power lied continuously about it"
And what do these "Elite Leaders" always do after being caught in a lie?
They DOUBLE DOWN! Lie some more, and order 10 doses for everybody! I think they are just following orders, they know the Alpha-Omega strain is coming and the shot/boosters will be mandated again. They are already planning on forcibly injecting everyone, except possibly in the US where most of us are well armed, and they will fix that with "food coupons" for guns during the looming FAMINE.
Seriously, they know large areas of the US will have to be "cleaned up" after the Hammer and Sickle starts flying over the White House, which will probably be painted in rainbow colors by then.
We will probably find out Obama was our first 'trans' president and he will be installed as premier for life.
As far as the DE-POP agenda goes, practically none of these "ELITES" have a clue about that, that is the big secret of the worldwide Intel Agency Conspiracy working for somebody, the NWO, Worldwide Communist Revolution, ALIENS, Tran-Dimensional Demons, World Banking Conspiracy, ILLUMINATI, Galactic Federation, JOOS, Masons, and/or -insert your favorite- here.
“No sides, no Sunnis, Shiites, Republicans, Democrats, just haves and have nots.”
-6-term Senator Charles F. Meachum
Guess who the "have-nots" are.
Sorry, but I'm pissed off this morning, especially since we already have confirmation that the "Alpha-Omega Strain" does exist, and in deployable form!
Thank God I bought that extra bottle of Ivermectin!
[Notice to FBI, it isn't here and I actually don't know where it is]
I don't trust ivermectin, it is a pHARMaceutical product. There are other options to maintain health and I still question whether or not there is a virus. The mortality data strongly suggests there is not.
It is a pharmaceutical product, but let us not take this too far!
How about gasoline, you trust it, a Big Oil product.
Or electricity, lithium ion bats, CB Radios, ball point pens, charcoal for grilling, the NFL (well of course not), Vegas (more than the government), court, the Police (not the band), or even your local BBQ establishment?
You know, at some point in the past, even Big Pharma had to put out effective products to get some traction, although certainly not required today.
As far as there are no viruses, you will get nowhere with that with me.
If there weren't, these madmen would invent them, as a matter of fact, they may already have! I maintain they wouldn't have such a cluster of viral research if they didn't exist, it would be more cut and dried, like sarin gas, or nuclear fusion.
Brian, you're going down a rabbit hole that is counter to nearly all evidence. You are correct that SARS-COV-2 is a bioweapon and that it's not particularly dangerous. There's a mountain of evidence that ivermectin, whose origin and nature is very well documented, is highly effective at preventing and treating the not-very-dangerous disease caused by SARS-COV-2, COVID-19. There's a mountain of evidence that elites suppressed true information, and pushed discrediting disinformation, about Ivermectin. Had they not done this then the injection-the-world operation would never have got out the starting gate. Ivermectin had to be discredited for the jabs to be approved and for them to get traction. It's pretty simple. That said, I 100% agree with your posts. Not disagreeing with anything.
Ivermectin is doing something, but what? If it is suppressing symptoms, like most other meds do, that is only of temporary value, if any. Is it a parasite issue rather than viral? Is it bacterial? This points to terrain issues.
I don't see much evidence that COVID-19 is a new and distinct disease. There are so many parallels with HIV and AIDS that one has to question very critically what is going on. Looking further, viruses have been blamed for many other so called outbreaks.
Had there not been so called cases of COVID determined by a faulty and fraudulent PCR test, there would be no need for IVM in the first place. It is important to be extremely critical and question all assumptions.
Brian, we know of THREE (possibly four) mechanisms of action for Ivermectin against SARS-COV-2. Each of them reliably shuts down disease replication. While I could detail them meticulously it would take a while, so I'd rather you to others who have already done so. Please toss out everything you know about Ivermectin and parasites, that's a completely different unrelated mechanism of action.
There clearly WAS a respiratory illness that affected lots of people. It seems like it was largely DONE by the summer of 2020. In other words, I agree with you that there was no real need for Ivermectin, in the same way there was no need for the mRNA injections. The respiratory illness only killed a few million people, mostly in 2020 and the winter of 2021. It was just a bioengineered excuse for the primary bioweapon, the injections. The disease had already mostly run its course by the time either 'solution' was available.
FYI: Invermectin seems to be a broad-spectrum antiviral. It can't be monetized, however, so pharma hates it. It's destined to be largely forgotten except by those who practice non-allopathic (i.e. EFFECTIVE) medicine.
LOL I take all of the above. I'm presuming that they hope to control the chaos that they unleashed but it does lead down some uncomfortable roads. Greed doesn't all cover it nor does pride...
Greed is the argument I use because the facts are easy to resolve with normies, much like Al Capone was tried for tax evasion because there was little defence, but the actual crime is something far, far worse, almost certainly related to eugenics if only to bring down the life expectancy and kill off pensioners( which they don't have the money to pay for) and possibly something related to graphene/transhumanism/5G
"If they KNEW that the “vaccines” were going to kill and disable a substantial amount of people, why did they use those instead of a more benign substance?"
It seems pretty clear that there's something in the jabs that hasn't been activated yet at scale. The other shoe has yet to drop. Why else would e.g. WEF have a target injection rate around 65% ? Why else would they care at all? We don't know just WHAT this activation will look like. Here's what we do know:
* There seems to be a witches' brew of Graphene Oxide (G-O) and/or Graphene Hydroxide (G-HO) in all the real mRNA injections. AZ, J&J, and Pfizer all seem to have this component. I'm not aware of any independent tests conducted on Moderna's variant, but it presumably has G-O and/or G-HO, too.
* G-O and G-HO are both a base material for nanotech structures
* G-O seems to be the base component of a hybrid form of advanced self-assembling nanotechnology. G-O, once floating about inside a warm body and exposed to electro-chemical stimulation from that body's Central Nervous System (CNS). Best evidence suggests that the G-O self-assembles around the CNS as activated Neural Lace. It also seems to include RF-sensitive components optimized for two way spread spectrum (e.g. wifi) communication. Graphene sheets provide the 'smarts' of the system via an established secret DARPA nanotechnology developed in the mid 1990s.
* G-HO seems to be the base component of an RF-activated 'kill switch'. At room temperature G-HO is a clear liquid. Inside a living body G-HO condenses into tiny 10 nm x 50 nm razor blades that are sensitive to RF radiation. Presumably the correct RF signal, either from outside or relayed from the G-O derived nanosystem, can turn on the kill switch. In the correct RF environment the tiny razor blades will spin in a circle, blade toward the movement, resulting in death by a thousand cuts.
In other words, the jabs seem to have within them two additional effects that have not yet been publicly used. If my agenda were to establish a global totalitarian dictatorship I might find both effects quite useful.
#1 First obvious use is to enhance propaganda mind control. Slightly tweak thoughts and senses to make it harder for individuals to resist propaganda mind control. Encourage 'good thoughts' and discourage 'bad thoughts'. This effect can be nearly undetectable. I guess this effect is already in play and partly explains the unprecedented effectiveness of the mind control system on the jabbed. Quote: "Most of the jabbed don’t seem too interested in knowing about it either." That's a 'bad thought' that is to be discouraged.
#2 Second use is more out in the open. At a certain point existence of effect #1 will become too obvious to ignore. The controllers will stop trying to conceal it. "It's a feature not a bug!" At this point the mind control effect can be turned WAY up. E.g. Directly stimulate the pleasure-pain sense to demand obedience in response to an internal voice.
#3 The 'kill switch' is essential for a 'clean' genocide. Two of the biggest logistical problems with committing genocide are A) Getting killers to keep killing enough victims and B) Disposing of the bodies. G-HO kill switches can be activated in the population in a precisely timed & controlled way, with each victim specifically targeted by MAC address and with zero accidental deaths. No need for Einsatzgruppen! Living victims pushed by effect #2 will act as "sonderkommandos" and dispose of the bodies.
It seems very likely that nanotech control and kill mechanisms are embedded in the jabs. This capability has not yet been publicly revealed and will be concealed for as long as possible, until the moment when it is needed.
Note that all three effects require the active spread spectrum RF! An informed and motivated populace can stop these effects by shutting off the electric grid and turning off all RF. That leaves only satellite-broadcast RF, such as the Starlink system, to do the control and killing. Starlink can probably only influence or kill thousands at a time, not millions. Starlink can be easily defeated by an state actor with both nuclear weapons and a space program.
Summary: The most probable explanation for why the actual deadly jabs were pushed, and not a harmless saline solution, was to install nanotech control-and-kill mechanisms in most of the human population. These can be leveraged, at critical moments, to achieve otherwise impossible effectiveness in both mass mind control obedience and mass killing. The technologies in question are well within known DARPA/BARDA technical capabilities.
I've been reading about humic acid as a potential graphene detox. Yes I think RF/wifi/ electromagnetic spectrum comes into play but it was a vast experiment within an experiment so the results are not uniform i.e. this lot number plus kill switch equals everyone drops dead in this area. It's absurd morally that such things were even contemplated by anyone
P.s. I've been delving into technical aspects of spread spectrum radio as it might apply this situation. I'm a physicist and biophysicist, a ham radio buff, a software engineer, and a computer security specialist. I'd like to figure out and disseminate practical logistical capabilities of the system. I.e. range & intensity of effects, does it expire over time?, graphene detox, jamming mechanisms, etc. I've failed to get much traction on the problem. It's been too difficult for me, so far. One can only keep trying.
Anyone who wants to learn about the basics of nanotech self-assembly should start by researching Wolfram's NKS, aka "New Kind of Science. Combine that with concepts in mathematical & theoretical biology pioneered by Stuart Kauffman. Those provide the scientific underpinnings of one way to generate, evolve, and manipulate nanotech.
I was writing hypothetically. I don't know this to be the case. Obviously. I DO have inside information about DARPA nanotechnology but of an earlier and different version. The version I know about (with certainty and in considerable technical detail!) was developed in the mid-1990s. I don't know whether or how it might apply to whatever nanotech is in the injections, except that it likes graphene (which was discovered in 2005!) and might act as the command-and-control system for the self-assembly process. More than happy to share anything I know in as much technical detail as the question can handle. Again, I have zero inside information about DARPA projects conducted since ~2010 or so, and I know nothing about nanotech that might hypothetically be in the jabs, but I do have detailed technical insider information about one particular form of advanced nanotech developed by DARPA. Oddly, I signed no NDA to get this info, which leaves me free to discuss it with anyone who is interested. I've been dealing with shadowbans and censorship for 10+ years ...
My 2 cents is that eugenics has been around over a century and the population is still increasing. Either their methods aren't very effective or they have not had the capability to enact on the scale they would like to. If there is a kill switch, what do you suppose they are waiting for, or has their plan been derailed due to quackcination uptake not reaching the aimed for threshold?
Eugenics started really gaining traction in the 19th century elite enclaves. They've been doing trial runs ever since but on a large scale level they might have caused the very thing they were trying to stop i.e. human population growth. This is what strikes me as the real fight of good versus evil. Wars for instance are an incredibly bad way to control the population growth the most war torn regions in the world have the highest number of births. Poverty likewise can lead to a survival level subsistence farming that demands more hands to work the fields. This is because when a woman does not know howany if any of her children will survive to adulthood she has a lot more of them. Death ironically begets life. The elites have had better results by ironically giving every creature comfort and maintaining the illusion that all will live forever. I wonder how many dead will be buried before this game grows tiring
The transhumanists believe the world is overpopulated, and a combination of limited resources and ecological catastrophe would mean mass death anyway, so since they think they are at the lead of evolution and are the most intelligent people on the planet, and scientific materialist mechanistic atheist besides, they think they should manage a controlled population decline with the elimination of the "useless eaters."
Except I think the most useless eaters on the planet are the people who constelate around the WEF, Brussels, the UN, DC, Beijing and Moscow, and the world would be fine without them.
LOL I've considered that! The syncopaths and bag holders, order followers, busybodies and press liars ate actually the most expendable for the betterment of mankind!
William, I am very much NOT a transhumanist, yet I agree 100% with with them on population and resource issue. Those are demonstrably true. My internal ethical structure renders me unable/unwilling to engage in the required mass killing. The basic chain of reasoning was summarized in year 2000 here by my longtime associate, Jay Hanson: https://web.archive.org/web/20020124114157/http://dieoff.org/page185.htm
I know, for a fact, that wealthy elite participated in and observed the associated discussion groups. Here's the crucial summary bit from the above link, published in the year 2000:
Constrained by the laws of thermodynamics, the availability of life-supporting resources will go into a permanent, steep decline.
In less than 20 years, the self-regulating market system will have "run out of gas" and vanished. With the market system gone, the ruling elites will fall back on the good old-fashioned means of control: a police state. In the US alone, 200 million guns in private ownership guarantee that this police state will quickly devolve into rebellion and anarchy.
If the anarchy scenario were to reach its natural conclusion, the global elites would be eliminated by the angry masses. Those who managed to escape would die more miserably than the poor since they are unsuited for day-to-day survival because they lived their lives like queen bees.
But when the above scenario seems inevitable, the elites will simply depopulate most of the planet with a bioweapon. [[39]] When the time comes, it will be the only logical solution to their problem. It's a first-strike tactic that leaves the built-infrastructure and other species in place and allows the elites to perpetuate their own genes into the foreseeable future: "War is a male reproductive strategy. All that is needed for the strategy to evolve, is that aggressors fight and win more often than they lose". [[40]]
The global genocide will be rationalized as a second chance for humanity -- a new Garden of Eden -- a new Genesis. The temptation will prove irresistible:
"Strangelove said, 'Offhand, I should say that in addition to the factors of youth, health, sexual fertility, intelligence, and a cross section of necessary skills, it would be absolutely vital that our top government and military men be included, to foster and impart the required principles of leadership and tradition.'
"The arrow had not missed its mark, and around the table there was an outbreak of sober, nodding heads. Attention was concentrated more than ever on Doctor Strangelove.
"Strangelove went on. 'Naturally they would breed prodigiously, eh? There would be much time and little to do. With the proper breeding techniques, and starting with a ratio of, say, ten women to each man, I should estimate the progeny of the original group of two hundred thousand would emerge a hundred years later as well over a hundred million…'"
When I said the world would be fine without the elite, I did not mean to deny thermodynamics nor resource constraints, nor the will of the elite to kill off 7bil. I simply meant we could avoid the elite controlled depopulation, scale down intentionally and probably improve circumstances for all living things, if we wanted to.
We could have done so but we did not. Some would argue that doing so violate human nature. While individual members of our species can practice restraint, the Maximum Power Principle pretty well guarantees that our species, as a whole, can not. Only in an environment of coercive authority is species-wide restraint possible. I don't like this conclusion but neither can I find fault with it. It would seem the elite WEF crowd agrees.
All that said, I feel exactly the same about the elite as does William. I got an elite education and studied alongside many members of the wealthy elite, so I know them well. I was invited to be in the social class of 'elite servants' but declined.
It couldn't get more maximum power principle than 7billion overthrowing the overlords, but yeah, unlikely. Nothing human nature either about genocide, unless you are willing to extend that the other way 'round. Glad your not being an elite servant is working out for you.
Sodom ad Gomorrah, no question. Evil personified, and multiplied by the millions of gusty minions who helped it to happen. One wsonder how many moral people are left in the world, given there are apparently so many who are depraved?
Some is the amplification of the most morally depraved to positions of power. The rest I think is buy in of the masses with things that compromise their integrity...
There could be a eugenics angle here, but what about the opioid crisis? That is a clear case of greed and disregard for the consequences of their products. The quackcines bring it to another level. I see it as the same as the illicit drug trade. They don't care about the consequences, they just want to do business with the advantage that the govt buys and mandates their products.
Are they eugenicists or just ruthless business people caught in an allopathic delusion? Or both? The population continues to increase, so by that measure they have yet to succeed. There is a big difference between slowing population growth and world depopulation.
The hope is that if such a time comes at least in the USA that some well armed former military grade snipers can get those health authorities to think twice about it...
I agree with Zool that forced injections from a worldwide health org with total(itarian) authority is coming in a few years. They will focus on the developed world. Here's an animated graphic novel about this hypothetical near-future dystopian world: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bjaef-6dLfk [YouTube, episode 1 of Unjabbed]
I think pride because these eugenic globalists think they are the only ones worth while to live in comfort or at all. Remember that it was Pride that brought about the fall of Lucifer!
It could also be about stressing something to the breaking point. Allopathic medicine has clearly overpromised and underdelivered in terms of treating chronic health issues. The more spectacularly it fails, the more obvious it becomes it is not an effective path for humanity to follow. The recognition that we can do better in the external environment now has to shift to the internal environment, i.e. the terrain model of health and disease.
"The problem was may many people in positions of power lied continuously about it"
And what do these "Elite Leaders" always do after being caught in a lie?
They DOUBLE DOWN! Lie some more, and order 10 doses for everybody! I think they are just following orders, they know the Alpha-Omega strain is coming and the shot/boosters will be mandated again. They are already planning on forcibly injecting everyone, except possibly in the US where most of us are well armed, and they will fix that with "food coupons" for guns during the looming FAMINE.
Seriously, they know large areas of the US will have to be "cleaned up" after the Hammer and Sickle starts flying over the White House, which will probably be painted in rainbow colors by then.
We will probably find out Obama was our first 'trans' president and he will be installed as premier for life.
As far as the DE-POP agenda goes, practically none of these "ELITES" have a clue about that, that is the big secret of the worldwide Intel Agency Conspiracy working for somebody, the NWO, Worldwide Communist Revolution, ALIENS, Tran-Dimensional Demons, World Banking Conspiracy, ILLUMINATI, Galactic Federation, JOOS, Masons, and/or -insert your favorite- here.
“No sides, no Sunnis, Shiites, Republicans, Democrats, just haves and have nots.”
-6-term Senator Charles F. Meachum
Guess who the "have-nots" are.
Sorry, but I'm pissed off this morning, especially since we already have confirmation that the "Alpha-Omega Strain" does exist, and in deployable form!
Thank God I bought that extra bottle of Ivermectin!
[Notice to FBI, it isn't here and I actually don't know where it is]
I don't trust ivermectin, it is a pHARMaceutical product. There are other options to maintain health and I still question whether or not there is a virus. The mortality data strongly suggests there is not.
It is a pharmaceutical product, but let us not take this too far!
How about gasoline, you trust it, a Big Oil product.
Or electricity, lithium ion bats, CB Radios, ball point pens, charcoal for grilling, the NFL (well of course not), Vegas (more than the government), court, the Police (not the band), or even your local BBQ establishment?
You know, at some point in the past, even Big Pharma had to put out effective products to get some traction, although certainly not required today.
As far as there are no viruses, you will get nowhere with that with me.
If there weren't, these madmen would invent them, as a matter of fact, they may already have! I maintain they wouldn't have such a cluster of viral research if they didn't exist, it would be more cut and dried, like sarin gas, or nuclear fusion.
Ivermectin is for treating parasites. Maybe covid is not what they are telling us it is.
The death numbers show that there was no pandemic, there was a casedemic. "The behaviour of the USA all-cause mortality by time (week, year), by age group, by sex, and by state is contrary to pandemic behaviour caused by a new respiratory disease virus for which there is no prior natural immunity in the population. Its seasonal structure (summer maxima), age-group distribution (young residents), and large state-wise heterogeneity are unprecedented and are opposite to viral respiratory disease behaviour, pandemic or not." https://denisrancourt.ca/entries.php?id=107&name=2021_10_25_nature_of_the_covid_era_public_health_disaster_in_the_usa_from_all_cause_mortality_and_socio_geo_economic_and_climatic_data
Brian, you're going down a rabbit hole that is counter to nearly all evidence. You are correct that SARS-COV-2 is a bioweapon and that it's not particularly dangerous. There's a mountain of evidence that ivermectin, whose origin and nature is very well documented, is highly effective at preventing and treating the not-very-dangerous disease caused by SARS-COV-2, COVID-19. There's a mountain of evidence that elites suppressed true information, and pushed discrediting disinformation, about Ivermectin. Had they not done this then the injection-the-world operation would never have got out the starting gate. Ivermectin had to be discredited for the jabs to be approved and for them to get traction. It's pretty simple. That said, I 100% agree with your posts. Not disagreeing with anything.
Ivermectin is doing something, but what? If it is suppressing symptoms, like most other meds do, that is only of temporary value, if any. Is it a parasite issue rather than viral? Is it bacterial? This points to terrain issues.
I don't see much evidence that COVID-19 is a new and distinct disease. There are so many parallels with HIV and AIDS that one has to question very critically what is going on. Looking further, viruses have been blamed for many other so called outbreaks.
Had there not been so called cases of COVID determined by a faulty and fraudulent PCR test, there would be no need for IVM in the first place. It is important to be extremely critical and question all assumptions.
Brian, we know of THREE (possibly four) mechanisms of action for Ivermectin against SARS-COV-2. Each of them reliably shuts down disease replication. While I could detail them meticulously it would take a while, so I'd rather you to others who have already done so. Please toss out everything you know about Ivermectin and parasites, that's a completely different unrelated mechanism of action.
There clearly WAS a respiratory illness that affected lots of people. It seems like it was largely DONE by the summer of 2020. In other words, I agree with you that there was no real need for Ivermectin, in the same way there was no need for the mRNA injections. The respiratory illness only killed a few million people, mostly in 2020 and the winter of 2021. It was just a bioengineered excuse for the primary bioweapon, the injections. The disease had already mostly run its course by the time either 'solution' was available.
FYI: Invermectin seems to be a broad-spectrum antiviral. It can't be monetized, however, so pharma hates it. It's destined to be largely forgotten except by those who practice non-allopathic (i.e. EFFECTIVE) medicine.
It's about power over and control of the people, with a dose of Eugenics. I'll take none of the above!
LOL I take all of the above. I'm presuming that they hope to control the chaos that they unleashed but it does lead down some uncomfortable roads. Greed doesn't all cover it nor does pride...
Greed is the argument I use because the facts are easy to resolve with normies, much like Al Capone was tried for tax evasion because there was little defence, but the actual crime is something far, far worse, almost certainly related to eugenics if only to bring down the life expectancy and kill off pensioners( which they don't have the money to pay for) and possibly something related to graphene/transhumanism/5G
"If they KNEW that the “vaccines” were going to kill and disable a substantial amount of people, why did they use those instead of a more benign substance?"
It seems pretty clear that there's something in the jabs that hasn't been activated yet at scale. The other shoe has yet to drop. Why else would e.g. WEF have a target injection rate around 65% ? Why else would they care at all? We don't know just WHAT this activation will look like. Here's what we do know:
* There seems to be a witches' brew of Graphene Oxide (G-O) and/or Graphene Hydroxide (G-HO) in all the real mRNA injections. AZ, J&J, and Pfizer all seem to have this component. I'm not aware of any independent tests conducted on Moderna's variant, but it presumably has G-O and/or G-HO, too.
* G-O and G-HO are both a base material for nanotech structures
* G-O seems to be the base component of a hybrid form of advanced self-assembling nanotechnology. G-O, once floating about inside a warm body and exposed to electro-chemical stimulation from that body's Central Nervous System (CNS). Best evidence suggests that the G-O self-assembles around the CNS as activated Neural Lace. It also seems to include RF-sensitive components optimized for two way spread spectrum (e.g. wifi) communication. Graphene sheets provide the 'smarts' of the system via an established secret DARPA nanotechnology developed in the mid 1990s.
* G-HO seems to be the base component of an RF-activated 'kill switch'. At room temperature G-HO is a clear liquid. Inside a living body G-HO condenses into tiny 10 nm x 50 nm razor blades that are sensitive to RF radiation. Presumably the correct RF signal, either from outside or relayed from the G-O derived nanosystem, can turn on the kill switch. In the correct RF environment the tiny razor blades will spin in a circle, blade toward the movement, resulting in death by a thousand cuts.
In other words, the jabs seem to have within them two additional effects that have not yet been publicly used. If my agenda were to establish a global totalitarian dictatorship I might find both effects quite useful.
Part 2:
#1 First obvious use is to enhance propaganda mind control. Slightly tweak thoughts and senses to make it harder for individuals to resist propaganda mind control. Encourage 'good thoughts' and discourage 'bad thoughts'. This effect can be nearly undetectable. I guess this effect is already in play and partly explains the unprecedented effectiveness of the mind control system on the jabbed. Quote: "Most of the jabbed don’t seem too interested in knowing about it either." That's a 'bad thought' that is to be discouraged.
#2 Second use is more out in the open. At a certain point existence of effect #1 will become too obvious to ignore. The controllers will stop trying to conceal it. "It's a feature not a bug!" At this point the mind control effect can be turned WAY up. E.g. Directly stimulate the pleasure-pain sense to demand obedience in response to an internal voice.
#3 The 'kill switch' is essential for a 'clean' genocide. Two of the biggest logistical problems with committing genocide are A) Getting killers to keep killing enough victims and B) Disposing of the bodies. G-HO kill switches can be activated in the population in a precisely timed & controlled way, with each victim specifically targeted by MAC address and with zero accidental deaths. No need for Einsatzgruppen! Living victims pushed by effect #2 will act as "sonderkommandos" and dispose of the bodies.
It seems very likely that nanotech control and kill mechanisms are embedded in the jabs. This capability has not yet been publicly revealed and will be concealed for as long as possible, until the moment when it is needed.
Note that all three effects require the active spread spectrum RF! An informed and motivated populace can stop these effects by shutting off the electric grid and turning off all RF. That leaves only satellite-broadcast RF, such as the Starlink system, to do the control and killing. Starlink can probably only influence or kill thousands at a time, not millions. Starlink can be easily defeated by an state actor with both nuclear weapons and a space program.
Summary: The most probable explanation for why the actual deadly jabs were pushed, and not a harmless saline solution, was to install nanotech control-and-kill mechanisms in most of the human population. These can be leveraged, at critical moments, to achieve otherwise impossible effectiveness in both mass mind control obedience and mass killing. The technologies in question are well within known DARPA/BARDA technical capabilities.
That's my 2 cents.
I've been reading about humic acid as a potential graphene detox. Yes I think RF/wifi/ electromagnetic spectrum comes into play but it was a vast experiment within an experiment so the results are not uniform i.e. this lot number plus kill switch equals everyone drops dead in this area. It's absurd morally that such things were even contemplated by anyone
P.s. I've been delving into technical aspects of spread spectrum radio as it might apply this situation. I'm a physicist and biophysicist, a ham radio buff, a software engineer, and a computer security specialist. I'd like to figure out and disseminate practical logistical capabilities of the system. I.e. range & intensity of effects, does it expire over time?, graphene detox, jamming mechanisms, etc. I've failed to get much traction on the problem. It's been too difficult for me, so far. One can only keep trying.
Anyone who wants to learn about the basics of nanotech self-assembly should start by researching Wolfram's NKS, aka "New Kind of Science. Combine that with concepts in mathematical & theoretical biology pioneered by Stuart Kauffman. Those provide the scientific underpinnings of one way to generate, evolve, and manipulate nanotech.
I was writing hypothetically. I don't know this to be the case. Obviously. I DO have inside information about DARPA nanotechnology but of an earlier and different version. The version I know about (with certainty and in considerable technical detail!) was developed in the mid-1990s. I don't know whether or how it might apply to whatever nanotech is in the injections, except that it likes graphene (which was discovered in 2005!) and might act as the command-and-control system for the self-assembly process. More than happy to share anything I know in as much technical detail as the question can handle. Again, I have zero inside information about DARPA projects conducted since ~2010 or so, and I know nothing about nanotech that might hypothetically be in the jabs, but I do have detailed technical insider information about one particular form of advanced nanotech developed by DARPA. Oddly, I signed no NDA to get this info, which leaves me free to discuss it with anyone who is interested. I've been dealing with shadowbans and censorship for 10+ years ...
My 2 cents is that eugenics has been around over a century and the population is still increasing. Either their methods aren't very effective or they have not had the capability to enact on the scale they would like to. If there is a kill switch, what do you suppose they are waiting for, or has their plan been derailed due to quackcination uptake not reaching the aimed for threshold?
Eugenics started really gaining traction in the 19th century elite enclaves. They've been doing trial runs ever since but on a large scale level they might have caused the very thing they were trying to stop i.e. human population growth. This is what strikes me as the real fight of good versus evil. Wars for instance are an incredibly bad way to control the population growth the most war torn regions in the world have the highest number of births. Poverty likewise can lead to a survival level subsistence farming that demands more hands to work the fields. This is because when a woman does not know howany if any of her children will survive to adulthood she has a lot more of them. Death ironically begets life. The elites have had better results by ironically giving every creature comfort and maintaining the illusion that all will live forever. I wonder how many dead will be buried before this game grows tiring
The transhumanists believe the world is overpopulated, and a combination of limited resources and ecological catastrophe would mean mass death anyway, so since they think they are at the lead of evolution and are the most intelligent people on the planet, and scientific materialist mechanistic atheist besides, they think they should manage a controlled population decline with the elimination of the "useless eaters."
Except I think the most useless eaters on the planet are the people who constelate around the WEF, Brussels, the UN, DC, Beijing and Moscow, and the world would be fine without them.
LOL I've considered that! The syncopaths and bag holders, order followers, busybodies and press liars ate actually the most expendable for the betterment of mankind!
BTW I picked sloth just because we outnumber them like 100,000 to 1.
William, I am very much NOT a transhumanist, yet I agree 100% with with them on population and resource issue. Those are demonstrably true. My internal ethical structure renders me unable/unwilling to engage in the required mass killing. The basic chain of reasoning was summarized in year 2000 here by my longtime associate, Jay Hanson: https://web.archive.org/web/20020124114157/http://dieoff.org/page185.htm
I know, for a fact, that wealthy elite participated in and observed the associated discussion groups. Here's the crucial summary bit from the above link, published in the year 2000:
*****************************************
Constrained by the laws of thermodynamics, the availability of life-supporting resources will go into a permanent, steep decline.
In less than 20 years, the self-regulating market system will have "run out of gas" and vanished. With the market system gone, the ruling elites will fall back on the good old-fashioned means of control: a police state. In the US alone, 200 million guns in private ownership guarantee that this police state will quickly devolve into rebellion and anarchy.
If the anarchy scenario were to reach its natural conclusion, the global elites would be eliminated by the angry masses. Those who managed to escape would die more miserably than the poor since they are unsuited for day-to-day survival because they lived their lives like queen bees.
But when the above scenario seems inevitable, the elites will simply depopulate most of the planet with a bioweapon. [[39]] When the time comes, it will be the only logical solution to their problem. It's a first-strike tactic that leaves the built-infrastructure and other species in place and allows the elites to perpetuate their own genes into the foreseeable future: "War is a male reproductive strategy. All that is needed for the strategy to evolve, is that aggressors fight and win more often than they lose". [[40]]
The global genocide will be rationalized as a second chance for humanity -- a new Garden of Eden -- a new Genesis. The temptation will prove irresistible:
"Strangelove said, 'Offhand, I should say that in addition to the factors of youth, health, sexual fertility, intelligence, and a cross section of necessary skills, it would be absolutely vital that our top government and military men be included, to foster and impart the required principles of leadership and tradition.'
"The arrow had not missed its mark, and around the table there was an outbreak of sober, nodding heads. Attention was concentrated more than ever on Doctor Strangelove.
"Strangelove went on. 'Naturally they would breed prodigiously, eh? There would be much time and little to do. With the proper breeding techniques, and starting with a ratio of, say, ten women to each man, I should estimate the progeny of the original group of two hundred thousand would emerge a hundred years later as well over a hundred million…'"
How could it be otherwise?
When I said the world would be fine without the elite, I did not mean to deny thermodynamics nor resource constraints, nor the will of the elite to kill off 7bil. I simply meant we could avoid the elite controlled depopulation, scale down intentionally and probably improve circumstances for all living things, if we wanted to.
We could have done so but we did not. Some would argue that doing so violate human nature. While individual members of our species can practice restraint, the Maximum Power Principle pretty well guarantees that our species, as a whole, can not. Only in an environment of coercive authority is species-wide restraint possible. I don't like this conclusion but neither can I find fault with it. It would seem the elite WEF crowd agrees.
All that said, I feel exactly the same about the elite as does William. I got an elite education and studied alongside many members of the wealthy elite, so I know them well. I was invited to be in the social class of 'elite servants' but declined.
That's why I agree with William.
It couldn't get more maximum power principle than 7billion overthrowing the overlords, but yeah, unlikely. Nothing human nature either about genocide, unless you are willing to extend that the other way 'round. Glad your not being an elite servant is working out for you.
Sodom ad Gomorrah, no question. Evil personified, and multiplied by the millions of gusty minions who helped it to happen. One wsonder how many moral people are left in the world, given there are apparently so many who are depraved?
Some is the amplification of the most morally depraved to positions of power. The rest I think is buy in of the masses with things that compromise their integrity...
There could be a eugenics angle here, but what about the opioid crisis? That is a clear case of greed and disregard for the consequences of their products. The quackcines bring it to another level. I see it as the same as the illicit drug trade. They don't care about the consequences, they just want to do business with the advantage that the govt buys and mandates their products.
Are they eugenicists or just ruthless business people caught in an allopathic delusion? Or both? The population continues to increase, so by that measure they have yet to succeed. There is a big difference between slowing population growth and world depopulation.
The hope is that if such a time comes at least in the USA that some well armed former military grade snipers can get those health authorities to think twice about it...
I agree with Zool that forced injections from a worldwide health org with total(itarian) authority is coming in a few years. They will focus on the developed world. Here's an animated graphic novel about this hypothetical near-future dystopian world: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bjaef-6dLfk [YouTube, episode 1 of Unjabbed]