The Science of Genocide

One Death is a Tragedy, One Million Deaths a Statistic

Look at the following video:

AG 🔥 @Yolo304741

What’s happening 👀

What do you think is going on there? Let’s take a poll:

Since Katy Perry dressed up as a Covid vaccine last Halloween, I would have to assume that she’s jabbed. This is an interesting case because it brought out all the “antivaxxers” and normies alike to weigh in on it. I am no medical expert but I think the most likely culprit here is actually eyelash glue sticking together. I only wear makeup maybe once a year on average, so I am no makeup artist there either. But the rest of her face does not droop and when I’ve had something get in the corner of my eye my response is to touch the side of my temple and pull as she does.

Some people suggested that this is a robotics version of Katy Perry, who thus had a malfunction in circuitry. I will admit Ms. Perry looks darned good here for being live in concert. Like wax model prototype of the stars at their height fake good? Maybe. I haven’t watched her music videos in some years and she’s always dolled herself up to Lady Gaga extremes.

This brings me into a broader conversation about the fact that no, not everything is because of the Covid jabs. Some people will have health emergencies, and car crashes, and sudden deaths that do not relate to the jab. So one side attributes everything to the jab, and the other side attributes everything to sheer coincidental factors. There will be individuals on both sides there. For years in Ohio prior to Covid, “dying suddenly” was known to be a euphemism for a drug overdose. It happened back then, and the official obituary usually covered up the cause of death, though if you went to the funeral and/or knew the family well personally, they would often tell you in hushed tones that the person had OD’d. I’m sure there’s still some of those deaths buried in the numbers that are now assumed to be Covid “vaccine” related.

From an educated level, how do you tell the difference? Both a tops down (macro) or a bottoms up (micro analysis are very useful. My education in sociology was focused on tops down analysis of statistics: My specialty was Marriage and Family Demographics. So I was looking at big picture charts of birth rates, death rates, and marriage rates across an aggregate population. There’s rising deaths and lowering birthrates in country after country, which in many cases did not start with Covid but rather came later after the jabs came on the scene.

At an aggregate level this is extremely alarming and there is no end in sight to it. It does not however indicate that everybody dies within a few years of getting the Covid shots or that everybody who got the jabs will be rendered permanently infertile. It paints a picture of a clear crime against humanity and a population lowering tool. In a sane world the focus would turn to prosecuting those that aided and abetted this crime and helping the jabbed heal from adverse effects now and in the future. Of course to do that we’d have to stop the shots.

Looking at group dynamics doesn’t tell me why an individual died or didn’t have a baby, say. It’s big level macrostatistics. For the other side you need the medical field. Enter the forensic pathologist.

“Sudden” and “Unexplained” Are Not Causes of Death

As explained by Troy Ross:

The National Association of Medical Examiners’ Forensic Autopsy Performance Standards indicate that a forensic autopsy will be performed when:

• The death is known or suspected to have been caused by apparent criminal violence.

• The death is unexpected and unexplained in an infant or child.

• The death is associated with police action.

• The death is apparently non-natural and in custody of a local, state, or federal institution.

• The death is due to acute workplace injury.

• The death is caused by apparent electrocution.

• The death is by apparent intoxication by alcohol, drugs, or poison, unless a significant interval has passed (while hospitalized), and the medical findings and absence of trauma are well-documented.

• The death is caused by unwitnessed or suspected drowning.

• The body is unidentified and the autopsy may aid in identification.

• The body is skeletonized.

• The body is charred.

• The forensic pathologist deems a forensic autopsy is necessary to determine cause and/or manner of death, or document injuries/disease, or collect evidence.

• The deceased is involved in a motor vehicle incident and an autopsy is necessary to document injuries and/or determine the cause of death.

Here is the bottom line: All-cause mortality is going up at an unprecedented rate. There are no good explanations as to why. We are slipping into a new Dark Ages with claims of not understanding the basic mechanisms of life and death – that is only because of willful ignorance. We can do better. Autopsy is a proven and underutilized tool that needs to be properly applied to keep us from drowning in our superstition and ignorance.

That list of reasons for an autopsy is quite long and does include suspected drug overdoses. It also includes suspected drownings and car accidents. There have been a lot of sudden deaths of expert swimmers in good health who mysteriously drowned. Did they die from something that stopped their heart prior to slipping under water? Did something incapacitate them which they could have been saved from if help had been available, but this then caused them to slip under fatally? Or was it just a freak accident, maybe egged on by poor swimming skills, alcohol and drug use, getting tangled in seaweed or hitting some object on a bad dive? I’m not a forensic pathologist but my guess is that they can tell the difference among those causes provided the body is not too degraded. That’s just one example. I’d say the same reasoning could be applied to car accidents and other causes.

And then there is this:

There is Test to Check if a Death Was Related to a Covid Jab

The reason many people against the Covid jabs think they are a big problem is not because of “anecdotes.” Young people did die of congenital heart defects and freak accidents before 2021. The magnitude of the crime is hidden in the raw numbers. One death is a tragedy, one million deaths is just a statistic.

This looks the opposite of science, unless the science is genocide:

Anti-Science NHS Scotland and NHS England Go Full-On Vaccine Risk Knowledge AVERSION

Public Health Scotland investigated why more babies than normal were being stillborn or dying within days of birth. They dismissed the Covid “vaccines” as a causal factor by not studying them.

They quoted PHS as follows:

Public Health Scotland (PHS) said its consultants had given “careful consideration” to the “potential benefits and harms” of carrying out such as analysis as part of its probe into the tragic deaths of 39 infants, but concluded against doing so because “it was not possible to identify a scenario that would have resulted in a change to public health policy or practice” given that vaccination policy was already “appropriately informed by good-quality population-level evidence and safety data”. 

“potential benefits and harms” of carrying out such as analysis” ??????????????

Now SCIENCE and KNOWLEDGE are a risk to public health???

…In a statement, PHS added that there was also a risk that “identifying the vaccination status of the mothers, even at aggregate level, would result in harm to those individuals and others close to them, through actual or perceived judgement of the effects of their personal vaccination decision”.

This is not real, is it?

I mean, we know the vaccine does not reduce transmission. PHS is saying that pregnant mothers must risk the life of their child to protect other people. PHS has gone completely off the rails and is anti-science.

...Furthermore “the outcomes of such analysis, whilst being uninformative for public health decision making, had the potential to be used to harm vaccine confidence at this critical time”. 

Vaccine confidence at ALL COSTS, even the loss of beloved newborn infants?

And how do they know it would be uninformative to public health decision-making?

The balance of risk analysis here only makes sense if

(1) One pretends the vaccine provides protection to others,

(2) One denies the reports of vaccine-related injuries and deaths.

…The decision came to light after the Herald on Sunday obtained internal emails and reports under freedom of information tracking the PHS response, with one email dated November 24 2021 stating: “We do not have any plans to examine maternal vaccination status, as there is no public health reason to do so”. 

Previously PHS had said would not be disclosing the information to protect patient confidentiality.

One can only conclude that vaccine risk and death denialism, which is at the very core of public health policy in western countries is the ultimate anti-science exercise.

So we don’t want to study if there is a link between a medical intervention and poor outcomes later, because that might damage confidence in the medical intervention? Obviously they are not going to stop…

Buy me a ko-fi