“15 “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. 16 You will know them by their fruits.”
Matthew 7:15-16
I think most of my readers are aware of the outlines of the war against humanity that we seem to be in right now. Ultimately a war against farmers is for control of the food supply. Like all other resources they need all of it under their direction and kept artificially scarce. This requires you to use their monetary system to buy the resources you need. The incentive structure is then set up in a manner so that those most willing to enforce regulations that further centralizes control are handsomely rewarded.
What possible reason would they have for shutting off water to 500,000 acres of farms in Idaho right after the farmers had planted their crops at a cost to them of between $400 to $4000 per acre? Idaho is not quite as dry as Las Vegas but I’ve been there and like most western states the crops are heavily dependent on irrigation. This is especially true when they are immature before they’ve established deeper roots. One or two weeks without water will be enough to destroy the entire crop. So was the plan to bankrupt the farmers, or to force them to buy into water rights from this district? Or was the entire plan just to cause famine and food shortages?
The people in charge always have their ostensible reasons for enacting these regulations, whether it’s about concerns over resevoir drainage or limiting nitrogen emissions or carbon emissions or climate change. Some people get paid a lot of money to go to some think tank conferences and write papers with ostensible reasons why this has to be done. The press fear mongers and politicians enact policies. More and more people are waking up to the lies.
It always comes down to following the money. As much as I hope that they don’t roll out the bird flu thing there’s too much money invested in vaccines. Mass testing and then culling the stocks also keeps prices high for consumers and gives them the shortages they so desire.
Obviously the government is paying these farmers when they kill off their entire flocks over bird flu. Here’s the livestock owners compensation for eligible animals slaughtered. There is seperate compensation for contractors. What if this all adds up to more than you can sell your livestock for at the market?
I noticed this mentioned at the beginning of the farm bill:
The 2018 Farm Bill amended certain provisions related to LIP effective in 2019. Those amendments included: • livestock death losses due to extreme cold are considered eligible losses without regard to vaccination protocol, or lack of vaccination; and • providing for compensation for livestock death losses due to diseases that are caused or transmitted by a vector and are not controlled by vaccination or an acceptable management practice. These diseases were previously covered under ELAP.
I’m guessing that these livestock have to be conforming to the established vaccination protocol to be considered eligible losses (unless they die from extreme cold). This seems like it might be aimed as punishment at smaller farmers and ranchers who might balk at the mass jabbing of animals. How much has the vaccination schedule for our meat expanded over the years?
These were the amounts received from the US government between January 1, 2020 and May 5, 2023. My guess is they’re making more money creating scarcity and chaos:
Why does the big money only seem to be directed at killing, maiming and making people sick and desperate?
The Great Taking is going to have to be fought off on every little plot of land one by one…
The war against is world wide, or at least western worldwide. How's such affecting the Orient?
They need to prepare the scene for the The North American Water and Power Alliance (NAWPA or NAWAPA, also referred to as NAWAPTA from proposed governing body the North American Water and Power Treaty Authority) was a proposed continental water management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Water_and_Power_Alliance
I first knew of this when BC was big on building dams in the 1960's and surprisingly the dams and proposed dams were exactly where they were needed for this wacko project. The idea struck me as dumb and unacceptable then -after the intervening years it is now dumber and less acceptable