18 Comments
User's avatar
Jim in Alaska's avatar

The war against is world wide, or at least western worldwide. How's such affecting the Orient?

Expand full comment
Amy Sukwan's avatar

They have it going on here too though it sometimes has a different look. We lost land we were living on in Phuket when the military wanted to use the area. They did some nasty things to get everyone out including blocking access to the roads and building a dam which blocked the reservoir which our farmer neighbors were using to water their crops in the dry season. The language changes but the strategy is similar all over the world...

Expand full comment
Coffee, Other News and More's avatar

They need to prepare the scene for the The North American Water and Power Alliance (NAWPA or NAWAPA, also referred to as NAWAPTA from proposed governing body the North American Water and Power Treaty Authority) was a proposed continental water management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Water_and_Power_Alliance

I first knew of this when BC was big on building dams in the 1960's and surprisingly the dams and proposed dams were exactly where they were needed for this wacko project. The idea struck me as dumb and unacceptable then -after the intervening years it is now dumber and less acceptable

Expand full comment
Amy Sukwan's avatar

They can shut down water to a lot of people very quickly which would be catastrophic...

Expand full comment
Debatable!'s avatar

They should just pretend they never heard of such an order, go Amish on them!!! At this point everyone just needs to start ignoring the bullshit and carrying on as usual

Expand full comment
Amy Sukwan's avatar

If it is as simple as turning on a water main somewhere to their farm I'd tell them to do that too. It's better to apologize than ask permission...

Expand full comment
SomeDude's avatar

it's not that simple though. the order is about prioritizing a 1900 water district claim on surface water over well usage.

the water mains will remain active under the order. it's folks who aren't on the water grid who are being restricted.

Expand full comment
JamesDuff's avatar

Idaho is not a blue state. Oregon is beginning to hassle small farmers on water and emissions. Hoping a regime change will change these wars on farmers which becomes us down the food chain.

Expand full comment
Kyle Young's avatar

As a farmer who has been farming in 3 different western states since 1975 I can say that the Western water laws are complex and convoluted. But first and foremost, those with the oldest grandfather rights get first access to water when drought conditions come into play. That's been written into the laws since day one. Because well pumping technology is relatively new, that means those who have surface water rights (diversions from rivers - an ancient irrigation technique) take precedence over the newer farmers who pump water from wells.

All of the farmers affected in Idaho have built a very shaky farming career based on the flimsy idea that they will always be able to pump as much water as they want from the ground to irrigate their crops. There was a lot of controversy some decades back when, state by state, it was decided to allow farmers to pump vast amounts of water from the ground to irrigate crops. The energy consumption alone to do that is mind boggling. I have a friend who farms just a few acres using water thrifty drip irrigation and 90% of his electric bill is for running his pump. I know someone else who irrigates 70 acres who had to sell their farm because they could no longer afford to pay the electricity to pump water.

In Cochise County Arizona farmers are abandoning farms because the water table has dropped so low that they can no longer afford to put in deeper wells. The deeper the well the more energy it takes to pump the water up. Sink holes are developing all over Arizona because of ground water pumping to irrigate crops.

Now the drought chickens have come home to roost in Idaho. If they don't curtail ground water pumping then the river dries up, the fish all die, the riparian habitat that depends on water running in the rivers dies off and all of the wildlife that depends on that habitat dies off. In other words, were talking about an ecological disaster. Would we rather have a small handful of farmers get compensated for their losses due to having water rights curtailed because of drought or... an ecological disaster

In my research I've found that a healthy riparian river system can provide more native food with 0 energy input than many commercial farms that depend on pumping ground water. And many of those commercial farms are producing commodity crops that serve the globalist agenda.

At some point we have to admit that farming is as messed up as medical care.

Expand full comment
Amy Sukwan's avatar

Thanks for your input on this. Many years ago my uncle and this investor friend wanted to create a housing community in Mesquite, Nevada. What stopped them was the cost and complexity of digging a well which supposedly had to go down to 10,000 feet to support the community with water.

I agree that there are more sustainable methods of watering crops than the current ones. But I have questions relating to the ability to use this water rights issue as a wedge for deeper agendas. It also seems to me like 2024 has been a wetter year in Western states...

Expand full comment
Kyle Young's avatar

It's definitely a wedge issue for developers. In some areas water rights can be bought and sold like gold or silver. In some places they can even be transferred from one place to another. It's a crazy mess for water resources, but it works great for developers.

Yes, the way water is used for ag is definitely outdated and inefficient. But it's built on the back of the Chicago Board of commodity trading, which is the Wall street of Big Ag. They call the shots on world ag markets. The whole system is baked in. Like the medical industrial complex, it all needs to be torn down.

Expand full comment
Joy Lucette Garner's avatar

Imperative subject to remain mindful of as they head into the "involuntary" portion of this extermination agenda via infliction of starvation on humanity.

Expand full comment
SomeDude's avatar

the statement was pretty much "join our Greenwashing Coalition and supply an approved compliance plan or we'll make your well usage illegal"

text data, for those like me who don't get their Nooz from video (I searched the article from the first paragraph of audio on the yootube link)

https://idahocapitalsun.com/2024/05/30/idaho-department-of-water-resources-director-issues-water-curtailment-order/

Expand full comment
Amy Sukwan's avatar

Thanks for this. I'm new to the area so I appreciate it...

Expand full comment
Andreas's avatar

"The Great Taking is going to have to be fought off on every little plot of land one by one…"

Indeed Amy.

The enemy won't ever stop.

Imagine yourself dealing with a psychopath or narcissist, someone who is unable to hear 'No' let alone respect it.

Organisations behave like psychopaths. Those organisations, those Organs, answer to Evil psychopaths.

Each time they are thwarted they will think up some new way to get what they want.

Collateral damage be damned.

They want us dead or enslaved. No other formulation of the facts add up in my mind. But with that hypothesis everything lines up.

The fight will be local. Ironic given the global scale of this assault on our species. But how else could it have been? The Monster has no army of its own (yet), and this is not HollyWeird. It needs to co-opt law enforcement and militaries, spy agencies and other unsavoury Organs long since allied with its designs. Sometimes there is even the need for an appearance of process, law, etc. Sometimes, though decreasingly so.

And while there have been far too many traitors selling us all out over the decades, paving the way to this democide with legal shaping operations, at some point The Monster's Organs need to interface with us to exert its will.

In a perfect scenario that interface would be with friends on both sides of this vast gulf, each downing tools and weapons and embracing as brothers and sisters. Rather than clawing away at each other, mild entertainment for utterly Evil puppetmasters.

But we have been so atomised, for so long, uprooted and cast into soulless cities where connections are challenged if not impossible.

Will the hapless pawns in the Organs realise in time? Realise they also took the same bioweapon that has been slaughtering our brothers and sisters? Realise that The Monster wants them dead, too?

When things go kinetic, people are more likely to hunker down and less likely to reconsider their position. As if the majority are receptive even now, their brains turned to hostile mush by the cornucopia of toxins they've been bathed in.

No, there will be a fight. Many fights.

Preemptive self-defense by sacking the DC Sewer may just be the least bloody option.

For the world.

Peace.

Expand full comment
BlueSphinx's avatar

Bird Flu is the next fake scare-tactic/money-grab.

This both tongue-in-cheek but very factual substack-article - published today - by dr Ah Kahn Syed on his Arkmedic blog does a very good job in explaining the hoax ("Hey, we successfully pulled it off once, why not try again?").

The trigger being half a million chickens to be culled in ... Australia!

> One Flew over the Chickens' Nest <

Bird Flu in Geelong can only mean one thing - Antarctic Chickens are coming home to roost. You must be crazy to believe any other explanation.

LINK > https://www.arkmedic.info/p/one-flew-over-the-chickens-nest

Expand full comment
Amy Sukwan's avatar

LOL I already read that one. Yes now they claim the natural origins birds came from Antarctica. It is funny.

I don't know what they're tinkering with in labs but what I'm wondering is why nobody is checking the 5G connection. Birds of all types are known to be affected by those antennas with mass die offs sometimes in concentrated areas...

Expand full comment
Mckeekitty's avatar

It is obvious "they" want us dead.

But first torture us so that we die agonizing deaths.

Expand full comment