26 Comments
User's avatar
jacquelyn sauriol's avatar

We (the ones who see the carnage) need to act like a flock of birds who all turn at the same time-what i mean if the docs/post mortem tests could be done suddenly on a big scale, so that no one doc gets punished, they would have to punish say 10,000 docs....or say with taxes, if millions of people do not pay (you can put the $$ in a secure account (!) because of gov mismanagement) and let them find and come after millions of people all at once....we need FLOODS OF NON COMPLIANCE/FLOODS OF TRUTH to beat this beast.

Expand full comment
Yet Another Tommy's avatar

Yes precisely.

Non-violent resistance.

In unison.

That's what they most fear, because they know its most effective.

Expand full comment
Vigilant Amalek Snow Leopard's avatar

Amy, are people good?

By nature?

Expand full comment
Amy Sukwan's avatar

By nature yes. But there is a dark side that has forever been dueling against it. Issues of ego are not a new phenomena. I think those in power have just become much more sophisticated at harnessing the darker aspects of human nature.

Expand full comment
Vigilant Amalek Snow Leopard's avatar

You ever watch Nature is metal videos?

Animals are incredibly cruel.

Are we animals? Yes.

But with a Spiritual side that supersedes instincts? Discuss. (If you want. 😅)

Expand full comment
Amy Sukwan's avatar

I'll have to ponder it. My thought though is does the action of the animal change depending on our viewing and interpretation of it? Is there like a divine light that shines within and reflects through or do we see darkness and death? Does the animal's behavior change based on our behavior?

Expand full comment
William Hunter Duncan's avatar

Humans have lifted cruelty to a similar degree as Tech. But there are many other ways animals show great tenderness and care, and yes, we are human animals and spiritual beings, and we have a choice.

Expand full comment
Shelle's avatar

Animals act on instinct; we have the capability for rational thought, to weigh the meaning of our emotions and choose.

Expand full comment
Vigilant Amalek Snow Leopard's avatar

Seems like we weigh our emotions and choose nukes and herd culling drugs.

Expand full comment
Shelle's avatar

It's what's so chilling about it - that we don't have to and it's what people choose anyway.

Expand full comment
jacquelyn sauriol's avatar

Seems some see nature as a thing to be feared/controlled (sub the word women as well), while others see nature as the source of all life and unassailable....a bunch of 'fraidy cats' in charge, source of fear not important, fear is fear. Immaturity?

Expand full comment
Amy Sukwan's avatar

Obviously immature...

Expand full comment
Yet Another Tommy's avatar

When they have enough to eat, and they're not abused or under attack, they are good. Amazingly good.

Expand full comment
William Hunter Duncan's avatar

If I may, I think on balance yes, we are children of the earth and we are born to cooperate at least as much or more as to compete. But we are far from nature in the way we live and sometimes the good seems far away like that too. .

Expand full comment
William Hunter Duncan's avatar

I wonder if this is something of what Shelden Wolin called inverted totalitarianism? Everything that is right and good and true does seem weighed down upon by a very heavy civilization gone mad.

There is a point, like when they unanimously vote themselves total immunity while "recommending" untested bivalent jabs for babies and kids, when maybe keeping your job as a condition of remaining silent is not the most important thing.

Expand full comment
SL's avatar

There is too much money to be made and most do not want to rock the boat because their careers will be destroyed. The truth is very few people speak truth to power. This whole righteous warrior rebel thing you see in Hollywood is a load of crap. The reality is that Superman would not look into suspicious deaths for evidence of vax poisoning because it could ruin his Pharma stock portfolio, plus he will no longer be invited to the fashionable superhero parties and Wonder Woman will not speak to him anymore. His book deals and autograph signing perks will go right out the window. So, Superman is going to fly right by the vax deaths and even his x-ray vision will not be good enough for him to see anything suspicious when his young fans start dropping dead. He may be super, but definitely not a hero like most of the humans on planet Earth.

Expand full comment
Amy Sukwan's avatar

Absolutely true sadly. The entire apparatus has been captured by an incentive structure that rewards all of the wrong things. The love of money is the root of all evil indeed.

Expand full comment
SL's avatar

This fits in to what we are talking about. Lying to people is apparently fine if it promotes vaccination, which is always good and all claims to the contrary can be completely ignored (we are medical professionals and are always correct and ethical).

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/stanford-tells-doctors-to-give-false?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=548354&post_id=79924184&isFreemail=false&utm_medium=email

Expand full comment
Philip Inman's avatar

ICYMI Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi reviewing from Arne Burkhardt explains that presence of specific antibodies also prove covid or <axx. I think the antibodies are easier to detect than the spikes themselves. easy to find on rumble. title is "Dr Sucharit Bhakdi: Organs Of Dead Vaccinated Proves Auto Immune Attack" w/o quotes.

Expand full comment
Amy Sukwan's avatar

Thanks for that one!

Expand full comment
jacquelyn sauriol's avatar

Woke up thinking, gosh, if the life expectancy is dropping, when does that concept get applied to the retirement? I would retire right now at 58 instead of 62. Funny how the 'speed'of science is so slow to catch up wrt age of retirement.

Expand full comment
Amy Sukwan's avatar

The big picture calculus of average mortality and such is pretty much blowing my mind right now. See the thing is in my whole life looking at these stats they've always been big picture calming. Sure a war here or an economic disaster there or even a disease in this time frame did something for a short time in some area of the world and then viola that stuff rebounds like magic even stronger than before. It's like a huge grid that is invulnerable to total collapse. Meanwhile this stuff is just stretching on and on over time over nations over the world. How many people will be left?

Expand full comment
jacquelyn sauriol's avatar

of course, retirement puts us at the gov's mercy, nonexistant.....so lump sum payouts only, with no penalty....i can dream can't i....!! It is OUR money anyway, we trusted them with so foolishly...

Expand full comment
jacquelyn sauriol's avatar

Oh Amy, I hear you, you have a deeper understanding of these stats as well....I now consider speaking to a lawyer about bringing a suit against the US Fed Gov, to sue for lowering the retirement age and quick! ....how does retirement at 40 sound? (sound of a slide whistle descending...) Whoa....

Expand full comment
Yet Another Tommy's avatar

Resisting Medical Tyranny

by Francis Boyle

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/61247968-resisting-medical-tyranny

Expand full comment
SomeDude's avatar

It's part of the good ol "can't find what you're (intentionally) not looking for" routine.

Just like how the "regulatory" agencies aren't seeing any safely signals, there's no inflation/recession, etc

Expand full comment