"We Are Expecting a 5000% Increase in Excess Mortality for This Year"
Can We Stop the Jab Program Yet?
I’m hoping this video embeds but if not I am pulling some quotes from disabled rights attorney Todd Callender.
“You would see a natural, actually an abnormal increase in all cause, cancer, heart issues, inflammation issues, blood clotting…. When you see all of them arising to hundreds of percentiles, in a class of people who are physically fit, 18 to 45, all military, and there is only one cause of that. And that is the destruction of their immune system. That is vaccine induced autoimmune deficiency syndrome.”
Even more chilling, he ends with
“We are expecting a 5000% increase in excess mortality for this year.”
As long as we saved one elderly life from Covid it’s all worth it, right? Safety first. I’m thinking we are at, collectively, the deer in the headlights stage of this. I think we all see the collapse but nobody really knows what to do about it. It’s like we’re dealing with alcoholics who do not want to admit that they have a problem.
The first step needs to be to stop digging the hole. Anybody at this point who uses any type of weasel words implying that these “vaccines” are in any way, shape, or form “safe” or “effective” needs to be called out for it. It’s like enabling an abusive alcoholic because they’ll get angry if you don’t buy them another bottle. The damage is all around us and plain to see. It’s artfully hidden by statistical fraud and boldfaced, blatant lies.
I’m starting to consider the idea that people who continue to get these boosters in the face of their declining health are actually subconsciously committing a type of suicide. Anybody who drinks themselves to death or overdoses is in a state of psychological despair that usually long preceded the final act. Those who have completely fallen into the mass formation psychosis of the entire Covidcon charade are people whose lives lacked meaning or purpose before it. Some of them must stay in this delusional state. Perhaps it’s an adrenaline surge to live through the successive boosters, as though this proves the “anti-vaxxers” are wrong. If I want to affirm my immortality by engaging in risky behavior, I’ll take up skydiving. It sounds like a lot quicker of a death if something goes wrong than the nightmare of illness and hospital visits.
Really though, can they stop hating themselves? There are countless mechanisms of harm in these vaccines, which can thus manifest in a dizzying array of symptoms and problems. It is clear that they do not stop Covid and reinfections in the jabbed are now driving cases. I believe that the short window of protection offered by the jabs was actually just an illusion from manipulated data and fraud. We are well past that point.
Step one is admitting that you have a problem. Only then can real healing start to take hold.
CashApp $AmySukwan
The first step to stop digging the hole is to admit that there is a hole.
When the word *vaccine is used, that word means to the Religious Vaccine Cult: stops infection or transmission, OR goalpost moved, reduces infection and transmission, OR goalpost moved, reduces hospitalization or death.
It does none of these things.
I've seen some disputes about how solid Callendar's data is from Kirsch and Matthew Crawford, and on the other side, that 2nd smartest guy in the world guy, but I really think if we can at least coalesce around ADE or "negative efficacy", and stop, STOP using just the word vaccine to describe exp. drugs?
The effect will be pronounced. (If I'm not mistaken Dr. Jessica no longer uses the word, V.)
As it is, we have many on the side of "truth" who just cannot break out of this habit and do not realize how it is hypnotizing to the person that you wish to persuade.
To stop using the word "vaccine" to refer to exp. drugs which do not
In regards to can we stop the jabs yet, we don't know their goal. Without knowing what they are aiming for, it is hard to know how long they will keep this going. Most if not all first world nations are already in negative population growth as regards birth rate but immigration makes up for it.
Do they want negative population growth overall? We have a long way to go on that, but if they are aiming for reducing lifespan and reduced fertility they have made some progress.
Do they want to condition people to accept regular quackcination? This is failing.
Do they want to make participation in the economy dependent on quackcination? Again, this is not going well, as quackcine hesitancy is on the rise, it will not be practical and would create economic chaos and would either drive people back to cash and/or digital currency and/or barter.