35 Comments
User's avatar
Vigilant Amalek Snow Leopard's avatar

The first step to stop digging the hole is to admit that there is a hole.

When the word *vaccine is used, that word means to the Religious Vaccine Cult: stops infection or transmission, OR goalpost moved, reduces infection and transmission, OR goalpost moved, reduces hospitalization or death.

It does none of these things.

I've seen some disputes about how solid Callendar's data is from Kirsch and Matthew Crawford, and on the other side, that 2nd smartest guy in the world guy, but I really think if we can at least coalesce around ADE or "negative efficacy", and stop, STOP using just the word vaccine to describe exp. drugs?

The effect will be pronounced. (If I'm not mistaken Dr. Jessica no longer uses the word, V.)

As it is, we have many on the side of "truth" who just cannot break out of this habit and do not realize how it is hypnotizing to the person that you wish to persuade.

To stop using the word "vaccine" to refer to exp. drugs which do not

Expand full comment
Brian's avatar

... which do not benefit anyone (at least in terms of health).

They told us quackcines would end the pandemic. Trudeau says we are still in a pandemic, but the quackcines are the way out. He and his WEF mentors are quite fixated on the idea of quackcines saving the day.

How big does the hole have to get? Evidently it is not even close to big enough as he extended the travel protocols until the end of June. Another goalpost moved.

Expand full comment
Vigilant Amalek Snow Leopard's avatar

You are in Kanada, and it is Fascist WEF controlled.

Expand full comment
LoveOneAnother's avatar

Do we have to wait until tomorrow to read part two of this reply? 😁😉✌✌

Expand full comment
Vigilant Amalek Snow Leopard's avatar

Yes. You have to donate $10 to Amy's Cash App and I will complete that last sentence.

Expand full comment
Amy Sukwan's avatar

LOL! I had never heard of this Todd Calender fellow before I saw this on Twitter earlier. I decided to do a Google search some jackals at WaPo already did a hit piece on him (he claims jabs cause AIDS! That's not possible!). I presume in this he is talking about DoD personnel which should be a young healthy cohort but I'd love to see the raw data. I think the simple big picture thing is this: the human body is complicated and interconnected. Harm from the jabs therefore could manifest in all types of ways. That needs to be a starting point for a holistic, integrative healing. But we can't get there until they admit there is a problem..

Expand full comment
Vigilant Amalek Snow Leopard's avatar

I wrote a post on him. For lack of a better word, he's fun.

He's fun to watch.

I feel like he is a bit like Ardis, both of them make little alarm bells start going off in my mind.

Like I'm being pulled down a rabbit hole.

https://sagehana.substack.com/p/atty-todd-callender-delivers-bonkers?s=w

He's got a recent Rumble video here where he and Lee Merritt just keep going into all kinds of ...you just have to watch.

https://rumble.com/v11wp66-dr.-lee-merritt-and-todd-callender.html

Expand full comment
Brian's avatar

In regards to can we stop the jabs yet, we don't know their goal. Without knowing what they are aiming for, it is hard to know how long they will keep this going. Most if not all first world nations are already in negative population growth as regards birth rate but immigration makes up for it.

Do they want negative population growth overall? We have a long way to go on that, but if they are aiming for reducing lifespan and reduced fertility they have made some progress.

Do they want to condition people to accept regular quackcination? This is failing.

Do they want to make participation in the economy dependent on quackcination? Again, this is not going well, as quackcine hesitancy is on the rise, it will not be practical and would create economic chaos and would either drive people back to cash and/or digital currency and/or barter.

Expand full comment
Vigilant Amalek Snow Leopard's avatar

OH don't worry.

This was probably just Round One.

Now they pull back...and release the next one. Hence the whole WHO Sovereignty deal.

Then you get your next round of Injections! Ain't it grand?

Expand full comment
Brian's avatar

I have heard a lot of people say that bodily sovereignty is the hill they will die on. If you lose control of your body what are you? It will depend on how many people choose to continue to depend on the state for their health. If this is a spiritual war, then perhaps the only ones left standing will be the ones who take on the responsibility for their own well being.

Expand full comment
Vigilant Amalek Snow Leopard's avatar

This is pretty profound and made me pause.

The way the world is set up now: the State is global.

And there is no private...the State is killing the private, plucky little small businesses to incl. doctors.

They've got us. They've got you and me...right now. Tagged, recorded, in the cloud. Stored in a server in Utah.

Expand full comment
Brian's avatar

They may be trying to kill it, but there is private. The harder they push the more people will withdraw. It is not easy, but is possible. I am sure you have seen the term parallel system - of money, education, health care, food, etc.

Expand full comment
Amy Sukwan's avatar

I agree. I think they pushed too hard and there is growing backlash. Building parallel systems has never been more important and I see clear signs of it. But many people are paralyzed and still in the denial stage. They are blatantly pushing through anyways. That's why I think they need to be stopped. Will people simply opt out or will they get is acclimated to semi permanent rolling states of intrusions on our freedom before a better system is found?

Expand full comment
Brian's avatar

The Great Reset may not be the one that Klaus was aiming for as people turn back to community rather than look to the state. If there was no state, would there be billions spent on weapons and wars? Who would fund that? Perhaps humanity is reaching a tipping point and the more ridiculous it gets, the more will decide they have had enough.

Expand full comment
nom de guerre's avatar

Shadow government. Never been a better time for it.

Expand full comment
Brian's avatar

If they have a digital "me" in the cloud what do they really have if I live off grid and our community supplies our needs? Globalism becomes a useless concept. We could, and some already have moved in that direction.

Expand full comment
Vigilant Amalek Snow Leopard's avatar

Will you write a post on this, maybe?

Living off the grid. How long until roving bands of Mad Max gangs come for your garden?

How will you have a doctor and a dentist and will you still drive cars and have stores and your own currency.

Not being snarky, I'm curious.

Expand full comment
Brian's avatar

I cannot write from direct experience, as I still rely on many things provided by the system. I am seeing signs that alternatives are becoming available and I think development of such options is/will accelerate as the push continues.

The Mad Max scenario is a concern, it depends on how things go in terms of energy and food. If there is a surplus the Mad Max factor will be negligible.

Expand full comment
Amy Sukwan's avatar

I'm writing a post about cooking banana flowers right now. The community of like minded expats on the ground in Thailand is still very scattered though...

Expand full comment
Brian's avatar

Reinfection or repeated poisoning? The PCR test does not test for the whole genome of the virus, only a few sequences. What if these sequences are created by the body in times of stress, toxicity, a result of deficiency or in the period of healing/regeneration?

The quackcines are gene therapy. That is scary enough to me. The results are evidence that letting people play with genetics is a bad idea.

Expand full comment
nymusicdaily's avatar

"I’m starting to consider the idea that people who continue to get these boosters in the face of their declining health are actually subconsciously committing a type of suicide." boom. thank you. hamster wheel is just as psychological as it is political.

elephant in the room is where folks like callender are going to sell off the risk they've taken on. at some point there won't be anyone but shortsellers. reinsurance industry is in shaky position and would have completely tanked if the tokyo olympics had been cancelled. we're staring down a crisis that will make 08 look like a walk in the park

Expand full comment
LoveOneAnother's avatar

"If I want to affirm my immortality by engaging in risky behavior, I’ll take up skydiving. It sounds like a lot quicker of a death if something goes wrong than the nightmare of illness and hospital visits." And just like the jabs, one can be injured skydiving. My older brother in his 20's was a frequent skydiver. He finally convinced his good friend to go. On the first jump, his friend's primary chute did not deploy completely but his friend decided to keep the primary and not use the secondary. So he landed very hard and broke his leg. Of course, my brother was surprised, but shortly after that injury, he quit skydiving.

From 2015, the skydiving stats are: one injury per 1,806 jumps and one fatality per 167,000 jumps.

Expand full comment
Amy Sukwan's avatar

It sounds safer than the jabs then. I'll run with a 1 in 1000 mortality rate on those which would mean that not everybody dies from them, but it is a genocide in the big picture. It gets tricky the further out from the time to extrapolate..

Expand full comment
Vigilant Amalek Snow Leopard's avatar

You have to look at years coming off the life from slow killers, too. Which is prob. impossible to track.

Expand full comment
Vigilant Amalek Snow Leopard's avatar

I skydived once. Thank God I had the deal that pulls the cord for you.

Expand full comment
Amy Sukwan's avatar

I dived off a 30 foot cliff at Lake Mead drunk because a bunch of strapping 20 year old military guys were too pussy to do it. I hit the water with some force! Never been skydiving though

Expand full comment
Vigilant Amalek Snow Leopard's avatar

I'm having a panic attack thinking about this. Heights.

Expand full comment
jacquelyn sauriol's avatar

Whackscene. Can anyone tell me just how hospitals are currently being successfully insured? Because even if insurace companies quintuple their rates they will still not stay in business. So right now, basically, nothing about the medical industry is insurable, or any other industry for that matter. How long can that float? I would love to see my local hospital replaced by anything else, an organic farm, many smaller clinics, a medical malpractice Musuem of Injected Injury?

Expand full comment