Do You Think There Are Cures For Cancer?
One of the nicest things about being away from television so long is that when you come back to it, you see what a junk diet of narrative and propaganda it is. At least that’s how it was for me.
Some days ago I was walking somewhere with my husband. I’d noticed a build up of pressure behind my right ear since I had woke up that morning. It was far more of a slight annoyance than anything to really worry about, topping out at perhps a 1 on a 0-10 pain scale. I used some Q-tips and saw that I had a buildup of dark ear wax. I went about my day and by the next morning the problem had gone away on its own.
I have no idea what “caused” the problem. Perhaps I had a slight bug, i.e. a minor infection (with no other symptoms), or perhaps a bug (I mean an insect) had literally crawled in my ear. Perhaps I slept on the bed wrong. It could possibly be the earliest sign of a glioblastoma or thyroid malignancy, but my attitude towards my health and preventative screening is largely that if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.
If you have watched a lot of television programming over the years, especially those fictional doctors shows, that’s not the way we are taught to think about cancer at all. The narrative on those shows is that cancer is a progressive disease that will eventually lead to death if not treated aggressively with conventional therapies of slash, burn and poison. Early detection is key, so get those mammograms and PSA tests. False positives or the psychological stress of being told about abnormal results is completely discredited as a problem. Instead the person is usually shoved onto the very lucrative conveyer belt of conventional treatment, which is win-win for the doctors. If the cancer patient dies, the oncologists fought a good fight, doing everything that they possibly could to end this scourge. The patient was brave and did everything right. If the patient lives, of course, whether that is in spite of or because of their chemotherapy, radiation and and surgery, then everybody can celebrate as heroes. Donations flow in for the fear mongering and the uplifting stories alike.
The entire storyline always seems to be the same. Death is stalking you without lifesaving and very profitable (for them) early medical intervention.
I thought Unbekoming gave an excellent overview of the various treatments that have been suppressed:
I’ve been looking for a high-level overview, and I came across it in 180 Degrees (I cannot recommend the book highly enough). You could buy the book for that section alone.
Here are some highlights[1] of that portion of the book’s text:
Executive Summary:
It scrutinizes the suppression of various alternative therapies, such as GcMAF, Laetrile (B17), and intravenous Vitamin C, which have shown promise in treating cancer but are often dismissed or criminalized by the medical establishment. The text also raises ethical questions about the role of law and the pharmaceutical industry in shaping public health policy, suggesting that the current system may be more focused on profit than on effective patient care.
Key Takeaways:
1. GcMAF, derived from a naturally occurring human protein, has shown promise in treating cancer but is criminalized in some jurisdictions.
2. Laetrile (B17), found in almonds and apricot kernels, has been used to treat cancer but is banned by the FDA in the United States.
3. Intravenous Vitamin C has been effective in treating various diseases, including cancer, but is largely ignored by the medical community.
4. The text cites 79 peer-reviewed papers supporting the effectiveness of GcMAF in the US National Library of Medicine.
5. David Noakes, who developed GcMAF, was convicted and imprisoned for selling an unlicensed medicine.
6. The author suggests that alternative cancer treatments are more readily available in Mexico.
7. The text raises concerns about the recommended daily allowance of Vitamin C for humans, comparing it to the much higher levels naturally produced by goats.
Excerpts:
1. "The scientific evidence clearly shows that GcMAF is potentially the most effective cancer treatment ever discovered."
2. "How and why GcMAF is being withheld from the public, despite an abundance of supporting scientific evidence, reveals a system of corrupt corporate control designed to profit from our sickness and death."
3. "There seems to be much more in play here than meets the eye. Vitamin C is a cheap and non-patentable option."
Statistics:
1. "We treated 11,500 people with superb results on 9,000. We saved the lives of 800 with terminal stage 4 cancer." – David Noakes
2. "In the US National Library of Medicine there are now 79 GcMAF peer-reviewed papers."
3. "A healthy goat normally produces around 185 mg/kg/day of Vit C = 13,000 milligrams per day. When a goat becomes stressed or ill, it can produce up to 1400 mg/kg/day= 100,000 milligrams per day."
From 180 Degrees I found this documentary Cancer: The Forbidden Cures
Also found here on Rumble (for when the CIA removes it from YouTube)
Here are my thoughts after watching the (excellent) documentary:
The history of suppressing effective cancer treatments is very long. Well over 100 years.
The history of shaming, cancelling, bankrupting, jailing doctors who innovate effective, safe and cheap solutions is very long.
Do we know how to treat cancer? Yes.
Would they love to blame it on genetics? Yes.
Are there many different ways to treat cancer? Yes.
Are surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation likely the best ways of treating cancer. No.
Is the whole official industrial cancer complex corrupt? Yes.
Would I trust a mainstream oncologist as far as I could throw him? No.
Would I donate to “cancer research”? No.
If I, or my family came down with cancer, would I consider going to Mexico? Yes.
Does this sound like Covid at all?
My response to Unbekoming’s post was as such:
Some years ago my oldest daughter asked me what I would do if I was diagnosed with cancer. I told her it would depend on a lot of factors, like whether I had gone to where I was informed of the abnormal test results for some completely unrelated reason. In short was a weird mass or abnormal result detected during a routine exam such as a PAP smear or ultrasound or radiography? Or do I actually have symptoms which are consistent with some sort of concerning illness? At a bare minimum if it was just some result detected during something else, I would want a second opinion by somebody who doesn't even know about the first result. If I truely have no symptoms I'd probably wait on even that, as whatever it is might well clear on its own. Now if I did have concerning symptoms, whether they be coughing up blood or persistent migraine headaches or near constant low grade fevers, I would likely consult for a treatment plan, somewhere far far far away from the original point of diagnosis like say Mexico. I'd figure even in those cases if cancer is an outgrowth of something I'm eating, drinking, breathing, thinking or doing then the change of scenery should benefit me regardless!
If I were diagnosed with cancer and I had symptoms consistent with a concerning illness, presuming that I was not incapacitated, I would almost certainly throw the kitchen sink at it with alternative treatments. Anything that seemed to alleviate my symptoms would be kept in the repertoire. I even know of an IV vitamin C cancer clinic on Tijuana Beach.
Why would a few antiparasite drugs work on cancer? I’ve read the unconventional theory that cancer may be the result of parasite infections. In my experience with dogs and cats this is entirely possible. Usually out here my pets, despite not using any treatment, have very few fleas or ticks. There are a few here and there but nothing to be concerned about. This changes when they become ill or stressed, when opportunistic parasite populations grow out of control. When not my dog Jungo was extremely sick, she had flies, mosquitoes, fleas and ticks on her body in droves. She also smelled terrible. Opportunistic infections take advantage of less than well bodies and may create a negative feedback loop. In those situations it may make sense to try to reset with a tried and true long tested off patent pharmaceutical, preferably one with a good safety profile.
This is my backstory on treating Jungo the dog, for animal lovers out there:
What I sometimes wonder is why is there not an immediate interest in saving lives? With cancer one would assume the interest would be in finding things that work to alleviate pain and suffering and allow the patient to live for the longest time possible. If something doesn’t seem to be working, but causes no harm, then they should have a right to try it. Does prayer work? It probably depends on who the patient is. Should it be outlawed in favor of pharma endorsed medicine? Only if you believe corrupt studies.
In reading through the Second Smartest Guy’s cancer posts I noted the extreme side effects and suffering and discontinued treatments endured by many of the patients on traditional cancer therapy. Here is the first example:
Case 1
A 63-year-old Caucasian male presented with flank pain, rapid weight loss, and transient fever. Abdominal Computed Topography (CT) revealed a 3 cm left lower-pole solid renal mass. He underwent open partial nephrectomy with pathology showing pT1a highgrade clear cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC). Several months later, he developed persistent left flank pain with finding of a 5.2 cm left kidney mass. Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) biopsy redemonstrated clear cell RCC, and pazopanib 800 mg was initiated. Follow-up CT revealed a new 1.4 cm pancreatic head/body lesion, persistent left renal mass, and signs of sigmoid colitis. Given the concerns for disease progression and intolerable side effects, pazopanib was discontinued and cabozantinib was initiated. Interval Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) showed stable size of recurrent left renal mass, mild decrease in 2.9 cm pancreatic head lesion, stable 1.2 cm distal pancreatic body lesion, and new 1.1 cm right posterior iliac bone lesion. Cabozantinib was ultimately discontinued due to persistent intolerable side effects. One month after discontinuation, repeat MRI showed increase in size of recurrent left renal mass, mild decrease in 2.3 cm pancreatic head lesion, stable 1.4 cm distal pancreatic body lesion, and unchanged 1.1 cm right posterior iliac bone lesion. Third-line treatment with nivolumab was initiated, and he only received three total treatments (240 mg × 3) over the course of a month due to developing severe rash and colitis. He was treated with steroids with resolution of colitis. During this time, he also started alternative therapy with FBZ 1 gm three times per week at the suggestion of one of his friends with head/neck cancer. Interval MRI imaging found near complete resolution of the previously noted left renal mass as well as decrease in pancreatic head/body and right posterior iliac spine lesions (Figure 1). Serial imaging for the past 10 months have not shown any evidence of recurrence or metastatic disease. He has continued taking FBZ without any reported side effects.
Managing to extend life by a few months in possibly corrupted studies at the expense of any quality of life whatsoever does not sound at all like beating cancer to me. Karen Hunt addressed this:
A question I’ve had is why do people endure all of this agony and still not face the fact, logically, that this treatment plan is not working? I’ve known of three people, still alive today, who swore that some conventional cancer therapy saved their lives (two prostrate, one breast cancer). The power of belief is extremely strong in personal healing and medicine, so I left them be. But for those with stage IV, low survival odds, months to live types of cancers, why don’t they try something different?
As Karen Hunt writes:
Prenuvo is cool because powerful influencers like Kim Kardashian promote it. The way to capture people now, especially young people, is not through TV ads but through the social media influencers they watch and listen to.
It doesn’t matter that the American College of Radiology released a statement saying that there was “no documented evidence that total body screening is cost-efficient or effective in prolonging life,” and expressing concern that scans could lead to “nonspecific findings” that require extensive, expensive follow-up.
The fact is our bodies aren’t meant to last forever. The longer we live, the more likely we are to die of something like cancer, because, well, we have to die of something.
Perhaps in accepting the inevitability of death, we bring more meaning and purpose to life. Perhaps we need to move away from quackery and start looking for the shortest ways between point A to point B (illness to recovery), with an openess to exploring new avenues of inquiry. Perhaps scientists and doctors should get paid for saving lives, not just incentivized to provide the most lucrative product for Big Pharma.
Jennifer Depew’s research on vibrational frequency in healing reminded me of the Royal Rife machine in cancer cures. I would have no problem in trying sound therapy…my ear seems all better on it’s own.
I never have cancer screening. Most of the time, finding something early doesn't help extend life. It just means living with the stress of being a cancer patient when you could have carried on as normal for longer.
A couple of years ago I found something suspicious. I was genuinely more terrified of the prospect of undergoing official treatment than I was of dying of cancer. It turned out to be benign, thankfully.
It's hard though. When you have kids there is a huge pressure to submit to the officially sanctioned treatment.
Watched the medical industry damage my Mom with cancer 'treatments' and she eventually got fed up and used Cantron and achieved some better health years after. She always got her flu shots, so I suspect that was the cancer cause. I would say that if I ever suspect I have 'cancer' I would use only plants to heal it, and nothing that I had to buy if I could avoid it. I also make sure I get enough sleep, I priortize that above all else. Also, to mention, this is NOT MEDICAL ADVICE, making tobacco tincture is ez -about .5 oz tobacco with a quart of vodka- use American Spirit if you can get it, its organic. A few drops (go easy) keeps any illness from accessing your nicotine receptors, which is what the badjabs are targeting. A quart of tincture will last a looong time, you can share it.