How Do You Feel About RFK Jr?
Robert F Kennedy Announced His Presidential Run as a Democrat. Will You Support Him?
As somebody who has been into real research on vaccines for well over a decade, I’ve been reading Children’s Health Defense for a very long time. In 2019 I even applied for a job there as a staff writer. I didn’t get the job, but the hiring manager was very friendly and courteous. I certainly didn’t hold a grudge and continue to read RFK Jr’s CHD on a regular basis.
I think the Powers that Be are running a reverse strategy to discredit the former President’s nephew. They know that he appeals to conspiracy theorists, who are inherently distrusting of most things mainstream. So suddenly he is getting slammed for a comment in which he supposedly said that climate change skeptics should be locked in jail. Twitter was trending #ClimateScam (don’t worry folks! Those algos are definitely not manipulated!) and the top result always seemed to be a video of him, except to me it sounds like he is talking about the Koch brothers not climate change deniers in general. I’m sure this is just an opening salvo.
I’d love Kennedy to explain the context . He has been fighting industrial polluters for decades. Does he specifically feel that man made global warming due primarily to rising CO2 levels is the correct answer and other proposals are incorrect?
I find presidential debates to be mostly unwatchable trash. Both parties have been so pro war and pro vaccine for so many decades that it really just becomes a matter of degree. For this reason I’m excited about the idea that the discourse might at least move to a healthy level of debate.
I mostly agreed with this email from Allen Stevo:
A reader writes:
--
Robert Kennedy is a Trojan Horse. He is to replace Uncle Joe and then give us more of the same. Do not be fooled
-A Reader
--
I very much value readers who politely tell me to be careful of things that I might be missing.
I learn so much in those situations.
So I’m not going to dismiss this idea out of hand.
But I am going to have to ask, “So what?”
Let us entertain the idea of RFK as a Trojan horse.
What difference does it make if the man’s last three years of views ended up as the views of a Trojan horse nominee?
It would be a huge win from where I stand.
Those views remain almost entirely censored in the mainstream.
And his views on vaccines going back almost two decades…
And his views on CIA-planned assassinations of American politicians going back much longer…
He knows his dad’s assassination was part of a CIA plot and he knows Covaids 2020 and the stolen elections were part of a color revolution.
I want RFK to be the Democrat nominee.
He is going to spend some time loosening up the media for fights that I want to have — masks, CDC, FDA, Fauci, shots, parents rights, CIA, extrajudicial killings, Church committee 2.0.
No Democrat in 15 years, has gone around as a presidential candidate talking about even half of that stuff.
In 2015 and 2016, I observed something: had Trump never won, he might have still been the most impactful presidential candidate of my lifetime.
He opened up conversation again.
He loosened the stultifying stranglehold of political correctness on this country.
That is one of the most important powers of a president: opening up debate and conversation again in a land of Orwellian lies, alongside media and Big Tech silence campaigns.
The bully pulpit of the US President may be one of his most powerful assets.
I have two options.
RFK as Trojan horse is the better of the two options.
If I am going to pay money to get my views aired in the media by a Democrat candidate, or if I am going to sit home and get Sleepy Joe, Willie Brown’s Girlfriend Kamala, and Aunt Nanshy’s nephew Gavin, well, I’d sure prefer to have RFK.
It’s not even the same game.
I don’t watch television but I did see part of Tucker Carlson’s first monologue following his departure from Fox News. I tended to agree with his sentiment here:
"Our current orthodoxies won't last. They're brain-dead. Nobody actually believes them. Hardly anyone's life is improved by them. This moment is too inherently ridiculous to continue, and so it won't.
The people in charge know this, that's why they're hysterical and aggressive. They're afraid. They've given up persuasion - they're resorting to force. But it won't work. When honest people say what's true, calmly and without embarrassment, they become powerful. At the same time, the liars who've been trying to silence them shrink - and they become weaker. That's the iron-law of the universe; true things prevail."
RFK Jr. obviously has an epic side storyline, being of course the nephew of murdered president John F Kennedy and the son of murdered presidential candidate Robert Kennedy. I’ve long paid little attention to presidential politics, in part because I agree completely with George Carlin: I think if you step too far out of line the murderous powers behind the scenes will kill you. You know somebody else who probably knows that already? RFK Jr.
I’m willing to entertain the other side. According to Brian Shilhavy, RFK Jr. has ties to Jeffrey Epstein. Most of the top secret stuff regarding him being a philanderer was not terribly surprising to me. I would hope that he has matured on that count, but it does not impact my support of him. A man keeping score of women he’s slept with sounds almost cutely bygone days cad in an era of Caligula-esque perversion. I don’t get the sense that RFK Jr is at this level anyways:
Or is he? I don’t know if RFK Jr is being placed in front of us by the powers that shouldn’t be, but I doubt it. I don’t think a great deal will change unless we each as individuals change it ourselves:
I’m not into hero ball, but I generally support RFK Jr. in his presidential run. But what do you all think?
I posted this to Sage’s stack a while ago, but I think it contains much of my sentiments.
-
RFK Jr. comes from political pedigree, so I think it’s part of his lens, his programming, if you will. Not in a nefarious sense, but must be acknowledged as a fundamental aspect of how he sees the world. He is, no doubt, cognizant of the failings and limitations of the system (having observed the fates of his father and uncle), but there’s a deep seat of hope in him. A hope that believes that change is possible.
I am much more pessimistic. Not about humanity, so much as the potential to redirect a deeply deeply compromised apparatus. And that’s what it is—an apparatus. Eventually, hopefully soonish, people will realize that this scaffold is fundamentally broken. Patching and splinting it, hacking it, is not only unrealistic, but ignores the reality of the depth of the brokenness. The mechanisms of control are too deeply seated, the layers and counter layers set to disarm the motives for change have subsumed any potential for ‘reform’.
The kind of changes a significant segment of the population yearns for exists outside the apparatus. Manifesting this doesn’t require the apparatus because it comes from the human soul. People just don’t believe in it, really believe in it.
The greatest trick politics plays is making one believe that possibilities only exist within the apparatus. That’s the frame. That’s the lens they want everyone to see the world through—because that’s where they control all the levers.
All of that said, RFK Jr is important because he manifests a courage that feeds the imagination. And until such time that the public is ready to let go of the apparatus, it will continue to frame (and limit) our imagination.
In the end, I think it will not matter if he chooses a blue, red, or other colored coat to wear. As ever, the apparatus will not let such an individual step up to the levers of power. Looking forward, his contribution may end up being that of a beacon—to ignite conversation, dialogue, and spark courage and imagination. But likely a beacon only, an unrealized dream.
All that said, in light of what appears to be an emptying hourglass, I fear time is not with us, and political change is much too slow to grapple with the rapacious beasts that are already culling.
Not wanting to be overly doom-oriented and in the interest of optimism:
Perhaps, just maybe, a beacon could serve to awaken belief in the necessity of imagining a different path, particularly for those who still cling to the apparatus like a psychic life preserver. Perhaps it could be the thing which draws just enough to achieve a true tipping point.
It’s not a terrible thing to hold out hope.
It is challenging to look at elections as any kind of meaningful action given what we know. Simultaneously, it is meaningful for many, and that makes the symbolism likely more important than the outcome.
That’s a pickle for critical thinkers and people who have delved and devoted serious thought into the workings of the machine.
One thing this whole journey has taught, I think, is how important belief truly is for everyone. There’s a deep yearning for finding good in our actions and choices. I think this has played, and continues to play, a significant part in the early embrace of the shots and propaganda.
Elections are very similar in many respects. There is the hero seeking aspect, no doubt. But there is also something else—it’s a yearning for hope, the potential for something better.
The challenge will be realizing that the hope doesn’t lie in the mechanisms of the apparatus, but within our collective selves.
he rubs elbows with All the ‘Elites’… venturing a guess he’s more ‘them’ than ‘us’… the whole system is rigged to the max… we don’t vote, we pretend to vote.